• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far did attitudes towards conscientious objectors change between WW1 and WW2?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How far did attitudes towards conscientious objectors change between WW1 and WW2? At the beginning of WW1, signing up for the army was voluntary, however, in 1916 it was made law that all men were required to join in the war effort. This was due to the lack of men volunteering and the rate of which men were being killed in the war. However, there were some people who didn't want to fight, they were called conscientious objectors. There were various reasons why men and women became conscientious objectors. Some of the reasons included: religion, such as Quakers, pacifists, socialists, emotional experience and medical reasons. Government attitudes could be seen to have changes between WW1 and WW2. Although people were given the right to be a conscientious objector in the 1916 conscription Act due to pressure from the Quaker MP's, in practise they were very unsympathetic. In WW1 people who refused to work were severely punished. ...read more.

Middle

Although men were given exemption they were expected to find other ways in which they could help with war effort such as working in a munitions factory. Men who refused to have anything to do with the war effort were called absolutists. If the Military Tribunal found no reason for you to be given exemption you would then be punished. In WW2 government attitudes were very different. Neville Chamberlain, the Prime Minister, was sympathetic and respected conscientious objectors' and saw them as 'scruples'. One reason to why he felt like this could be because it would be seen as hypocritical if he were to force people to do things they did not want to do. This was one of his primary reasons for fighting the war against Adolph Hitler. The number of conscientious objectors had increased from WW1. People saw and knew the horrors from WW1 and did not want to experience them again. ...read more.

Conclusion

People were opposed to conscientious objectors because they saw them as cowards. People were feeling patriotic so thought it an insult that people did not want to fight for their country. Mothers and wives that had their sons and husbands at war were angry that those who did not want to fight were safe. In conclusion, I believe that attitudes towards the conscientious objectors did change. However, the only dramatic change in attitudes came from the government. They were sympathetic and respectful and a lot more people were given exemption than in WW1. The fact that the Prime Minister himself said he saw them as scruples shows how much the attitude had changed. On the other hand, the attitudes towards conscientious objectors could be seen to not have changed much as the public were still very hostile towards them as they had been in WW1. So overall I do not think attitudes towards conscientious objectors had changed that far from WW1 because although the government were very sympathetic the public out numbers those in parliament and the public were still very much against conscientious objectors'. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. World war 1

    It put the decline of our fighting power beyond all doubt... The war must be ended." He informed Germany's political chiefs that peace negotiations should be opened before the situation became worse. Other new weapons used during the war were heavy artillery which could fire shells, which exploded into metal splinters called shrapnel over a distance of 13 km.

  2. How important were Haig's tactics in bringing an end to WW1?

    Haig's men were fighting in the position of a salient. This meant that they could be attacked on three sides. Haig was not discouraged by the casualties at the Somme. He believed that the Somme was as a good attack had occurred in the wrong place.

  1. To what ways and to what extent did the lives of the British people ...

    In May 1943 6 311 000 were working in industry or the armed services and in December 1943 1.5 million women workers were in the engineering industry, 30% of the total workforce" showing that women working did grow more popular as time passed.

  2. The Different Roles of Women in WW1

    It was dangerous and unhealthy work. Working on farms was a hard, physical and dirty job. 8. Is it fair that women munition workers receive so much attention compared to other women home front workers? Munitionettes produced 80% of the weapons and shells used by the British Army and daily

  1. How far did World War 1 change the role and status of women?

    so they would simply stop the militancy this was all happening around 1911. In 1914 Great Britain entered World War 1 the government promptly released over 1,000 suffragettes from prison. As soon as the war started the WSPU announced an end to the violence, for the duration of the war so they could focus there help on the war effort.

  2. Evacuation in WW2

    by the Government, to try and influence other parents to send their children away. This could prove the photo gave a misleading interpretation to the British public, which would mean that the photo was taken of people forcibly smiling and laughing and waving.

  1. History Assignment 2

    It suggests that women were regarded as important during in the war but won't be of any use afterwards. However, since this source is probably staged to show this sign, it becomes not 100% reliable.

  2. Compare two sources about work carried out by women during WW1

    Furthermore source A is limited as evidence of women workers in ww1 because it has a specific agenda, which is to encourage women to join the munitions work and over exaggerated. Source B is limited as evidence of the work carried out by women during the First World War because

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work