• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far did attitudes towards conscientious objectors change between WW1 and WW2?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How far did attitudes towards conscientious objectors change between WW1 and WW2? At the beginning of WW1, signing up for the army was voluntary, however, in 1916 it was made law that all men were required to join in the war effort. This was due to the lack of men volunteering and the rate of which men were being killed in the war. However, there were some people who didn't want to fight, they were called conscientious objectors. There were various reasons why men and women became conscientious objectors. Some of the reasons included: religion, such as Quakers, pacifists, socialists, emotional experience and medical reasons. Government attitudes could be seen to have changes between WW1 and WW2. Although people were given the right to be a conscientious objector in the 1916 conscription Act due to pressure from the Quaker MP's, in practise they were very unsympathetic. In WW1 people who refused to work were severely punished. ...read more.

Middle

Although men were given exemption they were expected to find other ways in which they could help with war effort such as working in a munitions factory. Men who refused to have anything to do with the war effort were called absolutists. If the Military Tribunal found no reason for you to be given exemption you would then be punished. In WW2 government attitudes were very different. Neville Chamberlain, the Prime Minister, was sympathetic and respected conscientious objectors' and saw them as 'scruples'. One reason to why he felt like this could be because it would be seen as hypocritical if he were to force people to do things they did not want to do. This was one of his primary reasons for fighting the war against Adolph Hitler. The number of conscientious objectors had increased from WW1. People saw and knew the horrors from WW1 and did not want to experience them again. ...read more.

Conclusion

People were opposed to conscientious objectors because they saw them as cowards. People were feeling patriotic so thought it an insult that people did not want to fight for their country. Mothers and wives that had their sons and husbands at war were angry that those who did not want to fight were safe. In conclusion, I believe that attitudes towards the conscientious objectors did change. However, the only dramatic change in attitudes came from the government. They were sympathetic and respectful and a lot more people were given exemption than in WW1. The fact that the Prime Minister himself said he saw them as scruples shows how much the attitude had changed. On the other hand, the attitudes towards conscientious objectors could be seen to not have changed much as the public were still very hostile towards them as they had been in WW1. So overall I do not think attitudes towards conscientious objectors had changed that far from WW1 because although the government were very sympathetic the public out numbers those in parliament and the public were still very much against conscientious objectors'. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. World war 1

    This caused a massive problem in Germany because of strikes and demonstrations, which paralysed Berlin. This also caused Lundendorff to resign; the blockade of German ports caused mayhem in Germany and played a big role in breaking the stalemate. The tanks also played their part in the war.

  2. The Different Roles of Women in WW1

    It was dangerous and unhealthy work. Working on farms was a hard, physical and dirty job. 8. Is it fair that women munition workers receive so much attention compared to other women home front workers? Munitionettes produced 80% of the weapons and shells used by the British Army and daily

  1. Evacuation in WW2

    I also think that the children could have been smiling because they would not had been with their father for a little while and would then have already been used to being near enough on their own. Nevertheless, the only photographs that were taken of evacuees had to be issued

  2. How important were Haig's tactics in bringing an end to WW1?

    He could not even make Haig change his tactics. Lloyd George was in a difficult position because he did not want Haig to have the men but had no choice, but Lloyd George had an overview of the whole war and was more accountable for people as he had to commit men elsewhere.

  1. World War 2

    The submarines had to be near the surface to fire their torpedoes so the planes could easily spot them. Britain would have no supplies from America, if the U-Boats sunk most of the convoys that came from the US. If the supplies did not come from America, the war effort

  2. World War 1

    This was so simple yet so effective. It would be given to a man who had not gone to war and he was meant to feel guilt and disgrace. This humiliated the man and he would have most likely gone to war the very next day. The single White feather as a symbol of cowardice comes from

  1. Compare two sources about work carried out by women during WW1

    Furthermore source A is limited as evidence of women workers in ww1 because it has a specific agenda, which is to encourage women to join the munitions work and over exaggerated. Source B is limited as evidence of the work carried out by women during the First World War because

  2. Key Worldwide Conflicts in WW1

    It was not known until much later that they had been sunk by mines. * On 18th April, 1915, armies attempted to land on the Gallipoli peninsula by attacking various bays. The Turks were expecting an attack, and thousands of the Allied troops were killed before reaching the shore.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work