How far do the sources A-D suggest that the distinction between the Suffragettes and Suffragists has been over drawn?

Authors Avatar

Kellie Atkins

Votes for Women

Practice Coursework

How far do the sources A-D suggest that the distinction between the Suffragettes and Suffragists has been overdrawn?

This essay is about discovering how different the NUWSS (Suffragists) and the WSPU (suffragettes) actually were, using six sources.

        During the suffrage campaign a lot of methods were used to receive the vote from parliament. One major method was propaganda. Up until 1908, the WSPU and the NUWSS had the same sort of propaganda methods which were in relation to the violent methods of 1913 were very passive. Source A is a leaflet explaining why women deserve the vote according to the WSPU, it was to persuade people that women did deserve the right to vote.  It was written by the WSPU in 1907, when the two main suffrage groups had a stable relationship. This is just one piece of propaganda which was supplied by the WSPU, to make their cause aware to all. This source has a very forceful manner “BECAUSE women are taxed without being represented, and taxation without representation is tyranny.”

Join now!

        Source C2 is a leaflet showing “14 reasons for supporting Women’s suffrage.” Written by the NUWSS. This shows that the WSPU and the NUWSS did use same methods. Source C2 was also used to persuade people to let women have the vote. Even though this source does not have a date, it was most probably written around the same time which the WSPU’s version was written, the reason for the because it is not criticising the WSPU, which the NUWSS later did in propaganda projects. This source is written in a similar way in which the WSPU produced theirs, “Because ...

This is a preview of the whole essay