• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far do the sources show that militant tactics hindered rather than helped the cause of votes for women?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Siobhan Hughes How far do the sources show that militant tactics hindered rather than helped the cause of votes for women? There is no doubt that the militant tactics used by the WSPU played a big part in the cause of votes for women, however whether it was a help rather than a hindrance is a topic of much debate The sources show that militant tactics used by the suffragettes hindered rather than helped the cause of votes for women to quite a large extent. However, we can be critical of the sources as to whether they are reliable sources by looking at who they were written by and the time that they were written. We can also look at the way the source is written and how it could be interpreted in different ways. Militant tactics hindered the cause of votes for women because some politicians believed that women should not be rewarded for such violence as it set a bad example. I think that even the suffragettes themselves believed that militant tactics were hindering the cause because, as shown in source A, Emmeline Pankhurst tries to justify her militant actions and denies that they hindered the cause. ...read more.

Middle

We can rely on this source because he has access to a lot of different evidence and he backs up his points. He is also not emotionally involved to the issue and so he can look at both sides of the story. Newspapers are very effective at expressing public opinion. As shown in sources D and E show that militant tactics hindered the cause. Source D shows how the WSPU are playing into the hands of the antis and the cartoon in source E displays a similar view. It shows how militant tactics are destroying the likelihood of women being given the vote by portraying votes for women as an owl and the militant tactics as the hammer that has killed the owl. As we know, there were numerous groups of people opposed to the cause of votes for women. The National League for opposing Women's Suffrage published posters in 1912, when opposition for votes for women was at its peak. One of the posters, shown in source F, illustrates that by giving women the vote would cause them to neglect their duties as women. ...read more.

Conclusion

We can also be critical of source B because it is clear that the writer of this source does not like the Pankhurst's and so this could make him biased towards the argument. 'The Pankhursts possessed a talent for self-publicity which they exercised for years after the campaign had ended.' He saw the Pankhursts as attention seekers. This means that we cannot take everything in this source to be politically correct. Clearly, militant tactics raised awareness; we can see this by looking at sources D, E and F. the issue is being discussed in the newspapers, which means that it is a major topic of discussion. We can also, to an extent, be critical of source C because although someone in favour of votes for women wrote it, Millicent Fawcett was the leader of another (non-militant) organisation and so she would not be in favour of the militant tactics. So, in conclusion, the sources show that militant tactics hindered the cause of votes for women at first glance, but by taking as closer look at the background of the sources and who they were written by, we can be critical of both the reliability of the sources and the different ways that they can be interpreted. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. Haig in sources

    hidden from the British public so they didn't lack faith and assurance that Douglas Haig and his generals and officers were not incapable and incompetent. 6. Study Sources J and K To what extent do these sources prove that the Battle of the Somme was a failure for the British and the French (7)

  2. I will look at whether or not the actions of the suffragettes harmed rather ...

    The whole article is an attack on the militant suffragette movement using this as a way to denounce the votes for women campaign, "Reckless fanaticism is not regarded by them as a qualification for the franchise." This article also leaves out the words, "They say that," before the word Persons,

  1. How important were Haig's tactics in bringing an end to WW1?

    The German government initiated armistice talks (October) with the Allies, but they failed when President Wilson insisted on negotiating only with democratic governments. The British advance meanwhile made rapid progress in northern France and along the Belgian coast, and on November 10, US and French troops reached Sedan.

  2. How far do these sources suggest that the militant campaigns of the suffragettes obstructed ...

    These limitation of the source do in some ways obstruct their own cause for the franchise because the only reason these women are in jail is because they has cause criminal damage or have caused some disturbance, and that the government has to force feed them so they don't die

  1. What can you learn from source A about the reasons given by the Suffragettes ...

    Source G is showing how in most industries in Britain between the years 1914 - 1918, women in employment had increased by an immense amount. These statistics show that the propaganda must have worked and encouraged women to join the work force.

  2. How far do the sources show the suffragette militant campaign to be an effective ...

    Source B is another propaganda poster probably published after 1913 when the government passed an act branded 'cat and mouse act' by the suffragettes. It was passed to ease the situation in prisons where women were outraged at being forced fed.

  1. What can you learn from Source A about the reasons given by the Suffragettes ...

    Written in 1907) "'Votes for women' is the shrill cry of a number of discounted ladies. But the truth is that women were and are destined to make voters rather than to be votes themselves. It cannot be denied that women suffer great injustice at the hands of men.

  2. The Militant Suffragettes

    on October 13th Christabel Pankhurst and a fellow WSPU member (Annie Kenney) went to a meeting in which Sir Edward Grey (a British government minister) was delivering a speech. They then proceeded to heckle him during his speech, which resulted in the two women being arrested.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work