• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far do these sources prove that Haig did not care about the lives of his men?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

General Haig: Butcher or war winner? Question 1 How far do these sources prove that Haig did not care about the lives of his men? From 1914 to 1918 World War one took place it was known as the great war. One of the most famous battles was the battle of the Somme this took place on 1st July 1916 and is one of the most remember able battles ever thousands of people British, German and French lost their lives. The man that was in charge of the planning of the battle of the Somme was Field Marshall Sir Douglas Haig, he had served in Sudan and South Africa previously before as a Cavalryman. Most soldiers that often win battles for their country are very famous, But in Haig's case this isn't so. Although he won a great victory for his country he is not remembered by many people as a national hero. ...read more.

Middle

"heavy casualties" He is saying that he knows that a lot of people are going to die but he still doesn't say anything about stopping it. But on the other hand he is trying to get the public to face the fact that yes many men are going to die but at least they will be giving up their lives for their country. He is simply stating the obvious because he knows that this is going to be a full scale war from his experience and that their was going to be massive consequences and that it would be really bloody. My opinion is that this source doesn't suggest any thing about the question he is just following orders from people who are higher ranked than him. Source 3 is another extract written by Haig from his report of the first day of the attack. "The men are in splendid spirits" This infers that he knows about how the soldiers are doing but in reality he doesn't really he just saying what the public want to hear. ...read more.

Conclusion

I think that this source does prove that he didn't care about his soldiers but not completely it shows that he wasn't even really bothered about them as he was just wining and dinning while his men where out fighting for his country. Source 6 and 7 are just Mickey taking out of Haig From source 6 "Clearly Field Marshall Haig is about...six inches closer to Berlin" This infers that the soldiers know that they are going to fight but they know that it isn't going to get them anywhere. Source 7 is a cartoon taken from a punch magazine and it Shows in a funny way how they know that Haig even though he is their leader and tells them what to do he is never actually their to help them fight along side with them. Overall all of these sources together I don't think that their is enough evidence to say that Haig didn't care about his men, I think that yes he may have done a few things wrong but not so much as to inherit a name like Butcher. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. General Haig - Butcher or Hero?

    Carrying on my previous point that the authors of sources 9 and 10 being able to twist information emanating reservations about the reliability of the sources. Also, both poems have been written post-1917; after such disastrous battles such as Arras, the Somme & Verdun.

  2. Study source A. Does it prove that Haig did not care about the lives ...

    the part of the officers and men, no superiority of arms and ammunition, however great, will enable victories to be won without the sacrifices of men's lives". Which means that no trainging, no abilities of commanders, no ammunition no matter how good, will allow victory to be gained without soldiers dying?

  1. Jarrow: questions 3, 4 and 5 (sources)

    Jarrow needed the governments help to save the town so they went on the crusade to get help because "protests were made, but nothing effective could be done unless the government was prepared to act" Ellen Wilkinson wanted the shipyard to be reopened so therefore they went on the Jarrow crusade to show they want something done with the problem.

  2. How Far does Source A prove that Haig did not care about the lives ...

    his own eyes so the people giving him this information may not have been completely honest. The generals working underneath Haig were under huge amounts of pressure to produce good news due to all the resources and time and money that had been put into this campaign.

  1. How far does Source A prove that Haig did not care about the lives ...

    He had good tactical idea but Haig choose not to use them. "no training, however good, on the part of the officers and men". Rawlinson suggested small attacks to give the British troops experience. "no superiority of arms and ammunition, however great will enable victories to be won.

  2. Haig was an uncaring general who sacrificed the lives of his soldiers for no ...

    "Who told them", which implies that Haig was misinformed, but overall Coppard is agreeing with the statement. Source D is a still from TV series 'Blackadder Goes Forth", and again this source mainly agrees with the statement. The source uses sarcasm as a way to criticise Haig, by saying, "Are we all going to get killed?

  1. "Haig was an uncaring generalwho sacrificed the lives of his soldiers for no good ...

    "Very Successful attack this morning. All went like clockwork. The battle is going very well for us and already the Germans are surrendering freely. The enemy is so short of men that he is collecting them from all parts of the line.

  2. 'Haig was an uncaring general who sacrificed the lives of his soldiers for no ...

    like the british nickname was the Tommies. George in this speech bubble is being sarcastic as he is saying a British style thrashing, but if you remember the British weren't doing very well in the war as they lost 57,000 men on the first day and that shows that they couldn't give a good thrashing.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work