• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far do these sources prove that Haig did not care about the lives of his men?

Extracts from this document...


General Haig: Butcher or war winner? Question 1 How far do these sources prove that Haig did not care about the lives of his men? From 1914 to 1918 World War one took place it was known as the great war. One of the most famous battles was the battle of the Somme this took place on 1st July 1916 and is one of the most remember able battles ever thousands of people British, German and French lost their lives. The man that was in charge of the planning of the battle of the Somme was Field Marshall Sir Douglas Haig, he had served in Sudan and South Africa previously before as a Cavalryman. Most soldiers that often win battles for their country are very famous, But in Haig's case this isn't so. Although he won a great victory for his country he is not remembered by many people as a national hero. ...read more.


"heavy casualties" He is saying that he knows that a lot of people are going to die but he still doesn't say anything about stopping it. But on the other hand he is trying to get the public to face the fact that yes many men are going to die but at least they will be giving up their lives for their country. He is simply stating the obvious because he knows that this is going to be a full scale war from his experience and that their was going to be massive consequences and that it would be really bloody. My opinion is that this source doesn't suggest any thing about the question he is just following orders from people who are higher ranked than him. Source 3 is another extract written by Haig from his report of the first day of the attack. "The men are in splendid spirits" This infers that he knows about how the soldiers are doing but in reality he doesn't really he just saying what the public want to hear. ...read more.


I think that this source does prove that he didn't care about his soldiers but not completely it shows that he wasn't even really bothered about them as he was just wining and dinning while his men where out fighting for his country. Source 6 and 7 are just Mickey taking out of Haig From source 6 "Clearly Field Marshall Haig is about...six inches closer to Berlin" This infers that the soldiers know that they are going to fight but they know that it isn't going to get them anywhere. Source 7 is a cartoon taken from a punch magazine and it Shows in a funny way how they know that Haig even though he is their leader and tells them what to do he is never actually their to help them fight along side with them. Overall all of these sources together I don't think that their is enough evidence to say that Haig didn't care about his men, I think that yes he may have done a few things wrong but not so much as to inherit a name like Butcher. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. General Haig - Butcher or Hero?

    Carrying on my previous point that the authors of sources 9 and 10 being able to twist information emanating reservations about the reliability of the sources. Also, both poems have been written post-1917; after such disastrous battles such as Arras, the Somme & Verdun.

  2. Jarrow: questions 3, 4 and 5 (sources)

    valuable that you can sell and that you really need the money. The money the government given was very little and often doesn't really help the people at all. Source f is not an reliable source so therefore we can not believe everything the source tells us as it is biased.

  1. Study source A. Does it prove that Haig did not care about the lives ...

    Haig is trying to inform the public about the consequences of the war as well as about his understanding that he will be responsible for all those possible deaths. He tells the public that "No amount of skills on the part of the higher commanders, no training, however good, on

  2. Haig was an uncaring general who sacrificed the lives of his soldiers for no ...

    The source is positive about the battle in one way, as the officers say they want to give a "darn good British style thrashing". The source was used for entertainment purposes so we cannot fully trust it as parts of what happened could be exaggerated to make it funny or more interesting than the actual events that took place.

  1. "Haig was an uncaring generalwho sacrificed the lives of his soldiers for no good ...

    Our troops are in wonderful spirits and full of confidence." This proves that Haig was informed that they had a successful start to the battle and that his men were confident of victory. As we already know, this wasn't the case.

  2. 'Haig was an uncaring general who sacrificed the lives of his soldiers for no ...

    You also know that he is being sarcastic as Blackadder replies with, "you mean 'are we all going to get killed?' Yes. Clearly Field Marshal Haig is about yet another giant effort to move his drinks cabinet six inches closer to Berlin."

  1. Study sources A and B. how far does source A prove that Haig does ...

    We know from other sources and information that this is true, thus showing he knows what he is talking about. From my own knowledge I know that Haig's statement in source A is false, as men at the front were far from happy, as it explains in source C.

  2. How far does Source A prove that Haig did not care about the lives ...

    been told this and not actually gone to No-Man's Land to check its condition. This is where Coppard has the upper hand. He would have seen "hundreds of dead...strung out on the barbed wire like wreckage washed up on a high water mark."

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work