• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far do you agree with the judgement that Tsarist rule and Communist rule were more similar than different

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Heleina Aston 'Tsarist Rule in the years 1856-1917 and Communist Rule from the death of Lenin to the death of Stalin both depended on high degrees of central power and control by the state. The similarities between the two forms of government were therefore much greater than their were differences.' How far do you agree with this judgement? Both Tsarist and Soviet rule under Stalin depended on high degrees of central power and control by the state. However it can be argued that the differences between the governments were greater than there were similarities thus disagreeing with part of the judgement. Firstly by examining the nature of rule in the two governments we can learn that they both relied on control by the state. The Romanov Dynasty had ruled Russia since 1613; this imposed an autocratic rule where there was no parliament, the Tsar had total power which was exercised through the army, police and the bureaucracy, this resulted in a high degree of central power. Communist rule operated under the Marxist theory that wanted power belonged to the working class. Communist rule developed into centralisation like Tsarist Russia, initially "Lenin's organisational principle was democratic centralism"1 this quickly vanished as he crushed the first constitutional assembly in 1918. ...read more.

Middle

A similar change came for the Soviet Union in the 1930's where it became a totalitarian state where a single party had power. Anyone that posed a threat to Stalin were imprisoned or killed by the newly reorganised secret police the NKVD. Stalin's terror was much more severe than that of the Tsar, purges began after the assassination of Kirov the party secretary in 1934, the death penalty was introduced for all terrorist acts. The main targets were part members "of the 1996 delegates who attended the 1934 congress, 1108 were executed in the next three years"6. Centralism was maintained largely by terror in 1936 the purges spread to Communist party leaders in a series of show trials evidence against the accused was often ridiculous, but it was a way that Stalin could keep total control over the state. This suggests that the Tsarist regime and Soviet rule did depend on high degrees of central power and control by the state but the ways that they went to achieve this were very different. The 1905 revolution is an important date for the change of centralisation in the Tsarist government. The events of Bloody Sunday on 22 January had triggered the 1905 revolution. ...read more.

Conclusion

Propaganda here was a means to get more control over a wider range of people, in conjunction with his terror it played an important role in control by the state. In conclusion both Tsarist and Soviet rule under Stalin depended on high degrees of central power and control by the state. However it can be said that the differences between the governments were greater than there were similarities thus disagreeing with part of the judgement. This is because the nature of the two rules were completely different, and also by looking at the extent to central power and control by the state changed within the two governments, it is clear to see that Stalin achieved a much higher degree of central power and control by the state to that of the Tsar. This suggests that they both aimed for centralisation and complete power but used different methods to achieve it thus resulting in different outcomes. 1 Modern history review. P6 2 Modern history review p7 3 Ibid 4 Reaction and revolutions Russia 1881-1924 p7 5 Endurance and Endeavour, J.N. Westwood p113 6 Russia and the USSR, Radway Richard, 1996. p15 7 Ibid 8 Russia and the USSR, p60 9 Stalin and Krushchev the USSR 1924-64 p33 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. 'The Five Year Plans brought glory to Stalin and misery to his people.' How ...

    a fixed low price and would only receive their wages for the work. Stalin intended all 100 million peasants to join collective farms. However, he realised that many of them would oppose his plans, so he began by dealing with the richest peasants first.

  2. Why did the Tsarist regime fall in 1917?

    Both the sources show food shortages and discontent. As they both show the same things, they are equally reliable. Source E is unreliable because it is a painting and is therefore susceptible to artistic exaggeration. If adding snow on the ground, and a sign saying "No bread today" will make

  1. 'Given time Stolypin's work might have saved Tsarism'. How far do you agree?

    Furthermore a resettlement programme was organised to move peasants out of the overcrowded areas of central Russia. During the period 1906 to 1913, three million peasants moved to Siberia and central Asia settling on lands which the government had made available.

  2. Using these four passages and your own knowledge, explain how and why historians disagree ...

    The proponents of this idea underlines that Lenin was physically absent during the time before the November Revolution in 1917 that overthrew the Provisional government. The historians also state the idea that there were many leaders that exercised great influence in the communist revolution.

  1. "Stalin was personally responsible for the Purges in Russia in the 1930s". Agree or ...

    An advantage of the murder was it sparked the escalating series of purges; therefore it is questionable whether his assassination was used as an excuse by Stalin to begin the Purges. Evidence to back up this statement is Stalin immediately under emergency "security" legislation was entitled to arrest people thought to be trying 'terrorist acts' against the regime.

  2. What triggered the Tsars fall?

    and dismissed able ministers and replaced them with friends of Rasputin. The Tsar and Tsarina soon lost even more respect, the country was appalled that Rasputin, a peasant, should be allowed such and influence on the running of the country.

  1. To what extent do the sources agree that Russian government policy on agriculture consistently ...

    We can infer from the source's province that Churchill had to be very careful what he said as to keep the Soviet Union an ally to Britain during the war. This explains the source's obvious distortion of the truth. Though we can see more advancement of agriculture under Stalin in

  2. Stalin was able to obtain total power in the USSR by the end of ...

    But Trotsky had to bear some responsibility for the fact that Stalin survived Lenin?s Testament successfully, for even as Stalin?s ambitious character was more and more obvious, Trotsky still didn?t regard him as a threat, which we can see from the fact that Trotsky did nothing when Stalin was trying to befriend Kamenev and Zinoviev.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work