• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far do you agree with the judgement that Tsarist rule and Communist rule were more similar than different

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Heleina Aston 'Tsarist Rule in the years 1856-1917 and Communist Rule from the death of Lenin to the death of Stalin both depended on high degrees of central power and control by the state. The similarities between the two forms of government were therefore much greater than their were differences.' How far do you agree with this judgement? Both Tsarist and Soviet rule under Stalin depended on high degrees of central power and control by the state. However it can be argued that the differences between the governments were greater than there were similarities thus disagreeing with part of the judgement. Firstly by examining the nature of rule in the two governments we can learn that they both relied on control by the state. The Romanov Dynasty had ruled Russia since 1613; this imposed an autocratic rule where there was no parliament, the Tsar had total power which was exercised through the army, police and the bureaucracy, this resulted in a high degree of central power. Communist rule operated under the Marxist theory that wanted power belonged to the working class. Communist rule developed into centralisation like Tsarist Russia, initially "Lenin's organisational principle was democratic centralism"1 this quickly vanished as he crushed the first constitutional assembly in 1918. ...read more.

Middle

A similar change came for the Soviet Union in the 1930's where it became a totalitarian state where a single party had power. Anyone that posed a threat to Stalin were imprisoned or killed by the newly reorganised secret police the NKVD. Stalin's terror was much more severe than that of the Tsar, purges began after the assassination of Kirov the party secretary in 1934, the death penalty was introduced for all terrorist acts. The main targets were part members "of the 1996 delegates who attended the 1934 congress, 1108 were executed in the next three years"6. Centralism was maintained largely by terror in 1936 the purges spread to Communist party leaders in a series of show trials evidence against the accused was often ridiculous, but it was a way that Stalin could keep total control over the state. This suggests that the Tsarist regime and Soviet rule did depend on high degrees of central power and control by the state but the ways that they went to achieve this were very different. The 1905 revolution is an important date for the change of centralisation in the Tsarist government. The events of Bloody Sunday on 22 January had triggered the 1905 revolution. ...read more.

Conclusion

Propaganda here was a means to get more control over a wider range of people, in conjunction with his terror it played an important role in control by the state. In conclusion both Tsarist and Soviet rule under Stalin depended on high degrees of central power and control by the state. However it can be said that the differences between the governments were greater than there were similarities thus disagreeing with part of the judgement. This is because the nature of the two rules were completely different, and also by looking at the extent to central power and control by the state changed within the two governments, it is clear to see that Stalin achieved a much higher degree of central power and control by the state to that of the Tsar. This suggests that they both aimed for centralisation and complete power but used different methods to achieve it thus resulting in different outcomes. 1 Modern history review. P6 2 Modern history review p7 3 Ibid 4 Reaction and revolutions Russia 1881-1924 p7 5 Endurance and Endeavour, J.N. Westwood p113 6 Russia and the USSR, Radway Richard, 1996. p15 7 Ibid 8 Russia and the USSR, p60 9 Stalin and Krushchev the USSR 1924-64 p33 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. 'The Five Year Plans brought glory to Stalin and misery to his people.' How ...

    life as they were used to a simple life before Russia was a communist country. The living and working conditions was disastourous as the Russian people faced tremendous adversity as the 'new' Russia came up through the ranks. However the younger generation believed that working as hard as they were would benefit their children and generations to come.

  2. "The Governments of both late Tsarist Russia and early Communist Soviet Union were essentially ...

    There was more of an expectation from the Tsars that God had given them total power and therefore they were responsible for the welfare of the people, and the fostering of a patriotic spirit and distinct identity. The Communists didn't have this natural belief, and they relied on the charisma and personal authority of the leader to rule effectively.

  1. Tsarist Rule in the years 1856-1917 and Communist Rule from the death of Lenin ...

    Both the tsarist and Stalinist governments used the idea of 'mother Russia' when stressing the importance of a war effort. However in the case of the tsars, defeats in the Crimean War, Russo-Japanese War and First World War had an adverse effect on the tsarist government, in which the idea of the 'divine, autocratic monarchy' had been greatly diminished.

  2. 'THE TSARIST REGIME WAS SECURE BY 1905'

    In addition they received extremely poor wages The peasants had to pay very high taxes on grain and also on items such as alcohol and salt. The peasant farmers not working in the factories suffered two very poor harvests and it came to a point when they could barely survive.

  1. Why was the Tsarist regime able to survive the revolution of 1905?

    in the October manifest and once again the Tsar was in control of Russia. This meant that the Dumas position was very weak and he did not live up to promise, once again showing that the Tsar was not giving people what they wanted in Russia, and no constitution would happen while he was in control of the country.

  2. Using these four passages and your own knowledge, explain how and why historians disagree ...

    Using these four passages and your own knowledge, explain how and why historians disagree about the role that Lenin played in the foundation and development of communist government in Russia. The role of Lenin in the foundation and development of communist government in Russia still remains a polemic.

  1. What triggered the Tsars fall?

    It was alleged that Rasputin was fundamentally ruling the country through the Tsarina. Of course, inevitably, the majority of the country held the Tsar responsible for allowing the situation to develop. There is some evidence that Rasputin had a sexual appetite, but no evidence at all that suggests him and the Tsarina were having a love affair.

  2. Stalin was able to obtain total power in the USSR by the end of ...

    ?most capable man in the Party.? So it was pretty obvious that he would want Trotsky to lead the Party after his death. If it was the case, he should have made in absolutely clear in his testament rather than leaving such an ambiguous comment, thus giving an opportunist like Stalin a chance to escape.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work