• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far do you agree with the judgement that Tsarist rule and Communist rule were more similar than different

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Heleina Aston 'Tsarist Rule in the years 1856-1917 and Communist Rule from the death of Lenin to the death of Stalin both depended on high degrees of central power and control by the state. The similarities between the two forms of government were therefore much greater than their were differences.' How far do you agree with this judgement? Both Tsarist and Soviet rule under Stalin depended on high degrees of central power and control by the state. However it can be argued that the differences between the governments were greater than there were similarities thus disagreeing with part of the judgement. Firstly by examining the nature of rule in the two governments we can learn that they both relied on control by the state. The Romanov Dynasty had ruled Russia since 1613; this imposed an autocratic rule where there was no parliament, the Tsar had total power which was exercised through the army, police and the bureaucracy, this resulted in a high degree of central power. Communist rule operated under the Marxist theory that wanted power belonged to the working class. Communist rule developed into centralisation like Tsarist Russia, initially "Lenin's organisational principle was democratic centralism"1 this quickly vanished as he crushed the first constitutional assembly in 1918. ...read more.

Middle

A similar change came for the Soviet Union in the 1930's where it became a totalitarian state where a single party had power. Anyone that posed a threat to Stalin were imprisoned or killed by the newly reorganised secret police the NKVD. Stalin's terror was much more severe than that of the Tsar, purges began after the assassination of Kirov the party secretary in 1934, the death penalty was introduced for all terrorist acts. The main targets were part members "of the 1996 delegates who attended the 1934 congress, 1108 were executed in the next three years"6. Centralism was maintained largely by terror in 1936 the purges spread to Communist party leaders in a series of show trials evidence against the accused was often ridiculous, but it was a way that Stalin could keep total control over the state. This suggests that the Tsarist regime and Soviet rule did depend on high degrees of central power and control by the state but the ways that they went to achieve this were very different. The 1905 revolution is an important date for the change of centralisation in the Tsarist government. The events of Bloody Sunday on 22 January had triggered the 1905 revolution. ...read more.

Conclusion

Propaganda here was a means to get more control over a wider range of people, in conjunction with his terror it played an important role in control by the state. In conclusion both Tsarist and Soviet rule under Stalin depended on high degrees of central power and control by the state. However it can be said that the differences between the governments were greater than there were similarities thus disagreeing with part of the judgement. This is because the nature of the two rules were completely different, and also by looking at the extent to central power and control by the state changed within the two governments, it is clear to see that Stalin achieved a much higher degree of central power and control by the state to that of the Tsar. This suggests that they both aimed for centralisation and complete power but used different methods to achieve it thus resulting in different outcomes. 1 Modern history review. P6 2 Modern history review p7 3 Ibid 4 Reaction and revolutions Russia 1881-1924 p7 5 Endurance and Endeavour, J.N. Westwood p113 6 Russia and the USSR, Radway Richard, 1996. p15 7 Ibid 8 Russia and the USSR, p60 9 Stalin and Krushchev the USSR 1924-64 p33 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. 'The Five Year Plans brought glory to Stalin and misery to his people.' How ...

    a fixed low price and would only receive their wages for the work. Stalin intended all 100 million peasants to join collective farms. However, he realised that many of them would oppose his plans, so he began by dealing with the richest peasants first.

  2. Why did the Tsarist regime fall in 1917?

    Source G was produced in 1916, by opposition to the Tsar. The purpose of the cartoon is to stir up discontent amongst ordinary Russians. The cartoon tries to suggest that the Tsar and Tsarina were heavily influenced by Rasputin. The cartoon shows this by depicting the Tsar and Tsarina in

  1. 'The Five Year Plans brought glory to Stalin and misery to his people' - ...

    could be bought by the government to feed the increasing number of industrial workers in the cities. Besides, the government needed money to finance new industries, the transport system - railways, power stations and mines. Peasants were the best targets to pay for the development areas as there were the majority of the population.

  2. 'THE TSARIST REGIME WAS SECURE BY 1905'

    of Russia contained 4/5 peasants and it would therefore not be a very good idea in upsetting them as they could go on strike and cause either a civil war or a national uproar. Middle class shared the view that there needed to be a change but unlike the other

  1. The blance sheet for russia.

    As if there was any alternative under conditions of war and famine. The real responsibility for this situation lies at the door of imperialism which inflicted unspeakable horrors on the Russian people in its armed intervention against the Revolution. There is no more disgusting distortion than the attempt to smear

  2. "Stalin was personally responsible for the Purges in Russia in the 1930s". Agree or ...

    of the total membership were purged from the party. However, it can be argued that Stalin was merely ridding the Party of members who were not committed to the Communist rule. The question of loyalty of members can be evidence, because the benefits, such as, high wages and better quality

  1. Using these four passages and your own knowledge, explain how and why historians disagree ...

    In addition, the physical absence of Lenin during the period before his arrival in Petrograd in April 1917 substantiates the idea that, in reality, Lenin only had an indirect influence over his own parties. Lenin's influence was limited to what "he could achieve by his journalism and his correspondence."

  2. Why was the Tsarist regime able to survive the revolution of 1905?

    to be able to concentrate on his domestic problems back in his own country. Witte was appointed to do this and he managed to ensure that Russia had to pay no reparations to Japan and they lost the minimum amount of land possible, they thought this would also please the

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work