• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How important was Haig's role in the successes and failures of the British Army from 1916-1918?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Haig Coursework - Unit 1 In December 1915, Douglas Haig became leader of the British Army on the Western front. How important was Haig's role in the successes and failures of this Army from 1916-1918? The battle of the Somme was a key battle during the war and the general field Marshall Haig's leadership was at the center of a controversial argument considering the amount of soldiers killed under his governing. Haig may have been responsible for killing many men but was it not the allies who won the war. Although the allies may have won the war there was no excuse for the amount of deaths that were caused by Haig. Over 60,000 men were said to have died on the first day but he still carried on for five months. All the blame may not fall solely on Haig but if he knew that his techniques weren't effective enough why did he not change his tactics which brought on attacks calling him a donkey for being so stubborn. The criticism was so high that titles of papers began to read lions led by donkeys. The idea of this was to emphasize how brave the soldiers were but they would be ineffective if led by a poor leader. Haig was mainly criticized at the battle of Somme. ...read more.

Middle

Haig had a lot of lives to carry on his shoulder as General but he should have been aware that one slip up may have cost him thousands of lives. Other sources reveal how he would just sit back and watch his men fall in their thousands just to try and weigh the enemy down and if that failed he would just try again. This is highlighted in the video 'Black Adder'. The video shows General Haig practicing with toy soldiers and just knocking them down and then sweeping them up. This shows how little sympathy he had for his men as nearly every family in the war had lost someone. If Haig was in charge of the British Army he had to rely on the information given to him by others but the information given to him by his head of intelligence John Charters worried about pleasing Haig and therefore resulted in him lying and telling him the battle was going well. Haig was dealing with a battle where he was given the wrong information about which might have caused him to change his tactics if he had known the correct circumstances. A major effect of this proved to be very vital as Haig was told that at the Battle of Somme the Germans were on the Brink Of collapse so one final push would topple the Germans. ...read more.

Conclusion

Over 300,000 British soldiers were killed in this battle and it took 3 months to take Passchendaele. What Haig had originally planned as a breakthrough was a complete disaster with the British only advancing five miles. The fact that the Germans suffered heavy causalities was the only real consolation in this battle. In conclusion to this it is impossible to determine whether the failures of the war should fall on Haig and it is unfair to say that Haig was solely to blame for the massive losses during the war. Haig though did make massive mistakes during the war but some of the losses were due to others misleading him which lead to heavy consequences and that blame should not fall on him. The argument against Haig was the fact of how little he cared about the death rate but as a leader you must put these things behind you and look forward. Even if Haig had been replaced how would you know that this new leader would have done a better job and was it not Haig's final tactic which won it for the British. So my final verdict is that Haig genially tried his best and in the end the British did win the war and Haig should take credit from that. As he had come under pressure because of his failures but should he not gain praise for his successes. ?? ?? ?? ?? Arun Vivek 10MSD, Mrs Snowdon -1 - ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. General Haig - Butcher or Hero?

    In comparison, the Influenza took comparatively little allied lives. The German army lost a lot of support during this period mainly because of the sheer amount of civilians that had died because the government were funding war and not still concentrating on public health.

  2. 'Lions Led by Donkeys' How Valid is this Interpretation of the Conduct of the ...

    All this evidence shows that the soldiers were proud of being able to help their country however they condemned Haig for his actions and leadership in the Somme. From the 4th-30th August 1914 to 30th November 1919 the Western Front had the highest deaths in battle at 684,376; all the

  1. I think Haig was a bad leader who made many critical mistakes during the ...

    holes pleaded with their friends to shoot them before they were drowned. Haig, however still being fed intelligence that suggested the Germans were on the brink of surrender, refused to pull out his troops. Over 238,000 lives were lost in the three-month battle.

  2. How far was General Douglas Haig Responsible for the Failings of the British war ...

    We can also not lay the blame on Haig for the poor ammunition that the men had to use. Most of the weapons, for example the shell, that they used, were made by women who were inexperienced and had limited training of making these weapons.

  1. The aims of the British army at the Battle of the Somme in 1916.

    The overall plan had failed as the British assumed everything was done when in fact the barbed wire hadn't been cut, although it was described as passable in places. Also the German heavy artillery hadn't been destroyed and hardly any German troops had been killed because they were all hiding

  2. How important were Haig's tactics in bringing an end to WW1?

    The land was also churned up by the bombardment. The bombardment lasted two weeks and four million shells were used. People were dying in the quagmire of a battlefield left by the bombardment. The attack of the cavalry and infantry began on the 31st July.

  1. 'Lions led by donkeys.' How valid is this interpretation of the leadership of Douglas ...

    He was appointed Major General at the age of 42 due to his service in the Sudan and South Africa. He was socially connected and his marriage to one of Queen Victoria's maids of honour. In the First World War, Haig served as commander of I Corps and First Army in France.

  2. Was General Haig a donkey or a great commander?

    communication systems, he would not have full use of them because he was such an uninspiring and inadequate oral communicator. He often left subordinates with orders that were either incomprehensible or not fully explained. Many people say that he was too distant, and never brought himself down to the level of his inferiors in rank.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work