• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How useful are Sources A, B and C to an historian studying the attitudes of British soldiers to their commanders during the First World War? Use Sources A to C and knowledge form your studies in your answer

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

1. Evaluation of sources for their utility How useful are Sources A, B and C to an historian studying the attitudes of British soldiers to their commanders during the First World War? Use Sources A to C and knowledge form your studies in your answer. Source A is a cartoon from the British magazine Punch. Punch was known for its attention to detail, therefore at the very least the source is reliable, and therefore can be useful. Although I have not managed to find any information on the picture on the internet, its style and design suggest that it was done during the time of the war, or just after. The fact that it is ridiculing generals suggests the latter; however Punch is a controversial magazine, so this is not definite. Either way, the author had a good opportunity to have accurate information, straight from the soldiers who had been on the front and in the rehearsals, but weren't currently serving. Indeed, the source would most probably have these soldiers' opinions as its origin. ...read more.

Middle

However, to be fully useful, other sources would have to be used to verify these assumptions. Source B is a quote from a comedy television series. More exactly, it is from the 6th episode of Blackadder goes forth, and was first broadcast on the 2nd November 1989, and presumably written not long before. This means that the scriptwriter (Ben Elton) most probably would have not consulted actual soldiers, nor had been there himself. Indeed, Ben Elton was born in 1959, making it impossible for him to have been a soldier, and anyone he would interview would have to be at least 88, and I doubt that the scriptwriter would go to such lengths. However, what it does do is base itself on common opinions. Since, as I have previously mentioned, the common view was that of the soldier of his family, it would have been based on soldiers' views. If this was taken alone, it would make the source very useful. Also, the scriptwriter would have unconscious bias against the generals, simply from the society. ...read more.

Conclusion

He would therefore not only have conscious bias due to his feeling of loyalty to his family, but would also have unconscious bias due to his father's bringing up. Earl Haig mentions what the old soldiers thought. However, he would not have actually talked to them, but would have just heard his father saying this. In turn, Field Marshall Haig would not have had very accurate reports on his soldiers' attitudes to his plans, for the simple reason that they would have been afraid to say anything bad about them. This stops the source from being reliable for soldiers' opinions. An unreliable source is rarely useful by itself. Furthermore, Earl Haig's purpose in saying this would be to somewhat rescue his father's reputation; therefore he may have been inclined to bend the truth somewhat. In conclusion, Earl Haig's quote is an attempt to rescue his father's reputation based on unreliable information given to him by his father. It is unreliable, and since a historian can't tell whether what he says is true or not, it is in no way useful in finding out what soldiers thought about generals, especially Haig. Leszek Swirski Question 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. World war 1

    Lloyd George view have differed because in 1916, Haig plan managed to divert the Germans from Verdun and the Germans lines were getting overrun, however Haig's awful strategy did not mange to a breakthrough. The major difference between the two sources it that they are written at different times and this makes them differ.

  2. Haig in sources

    After the first day of the Somme, nearly 20,000 British soldiers were killed, most of them in their twenties. Pal Battalions were wiped out, villages and towns all over the empire lost a whole generation of young men. The Germans had a large, well trained and well equipped army.

  1. How useful are sources A, B and C to an historian studying the attitudes ...

    It is very hard to tell whether this source is biased or not because we do not know where the producers of the show got their information or whether they were trying to provide a biased view. However the writers were well educated and it is very probable they did lots of research.

  2. Styal Mill - Study sources A, B, C and D. Which of these sources ...

    We know this because it says "Mr. Greg pays doctor Holland for all the medicine and for coming out." Which may suggest why they had little sickness as they could be treated. The final limitation of the source is that the extract is only based upon styal mill, where as the question asks about all mills in

  1. Did the First World War liberate British women?

    evidence towards any argument, it just basically describes what the suffragists and suffragettes were. Source B6 talks about a women suffragette who threw herself under the Kings horse at the Espom races. She went by the name of Emily Davison she was fatally injured and died.

  2. Sources A,B and C portray a particular view of the attitudes of British Soldiers ...

    The source has been taken as an extract from the television programme Blackadder, it says 'General "Insanity" Melchit invites you to a mass slaughter' this means the source holds a negative view point that staff officers who were often not in battle were not liked or respected amongst soldiers who fought in the War.

  1. You have been commissioned to undertake research into attitudes toward the Good Friday Agreement ...

    With each of these questions I will consider how the respondents voted on the 1998 referendum and also how they would vote if another referendum were to take place. This will illustrate how people's attitude towards the agreement has changed and developed over the years, since 1998 to 2001.

  2. How useful are sources A, B, and C to a historian studying the attitudes ...

    It was written in the 1990's so the writer would have access to much information about the feelings of men on the front. However, it is a comedy program and is meant to be funny, not teach a lesson about the views of soldiers about their commanders and as such

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work