• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How useful are Sources A, B and C to an historian studying the attitudes of British soldiers to their commanders during the First World War? Use Sources A to C and knowledge form your studies in your answer

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

1. Evaluation of sources for their utility How useful are Sources A, B and C to an historian studying the attitudes of British soldiers to their commanders during the First World War? Use Sources A to C and knowledge form your studies in your answer. Source A is a cartoon from the British magazine Punch. Punch was known for its attention to detail, therefore at the very least the source is reliable, and therefore can be useful. Although I have not managed to find any information on the picture on the internet, its style and design suggest that it was done during the time of the war, or just after. The fact that it is ridiculing generals suggests the latter; however Punch is a controversial magazine, so this is not definite. Either way, the author had a good opportunity to have accurate information, straight from the soldiers who had been on the front and in the rehearsals, but weren't currently serving. Indeed, the source would most probably have these soldiers' opinions as its origin. ...read more.

Middle

However, to be fully useful, other sources would have to be used to verify these assumptions. Source B is a quote from a comedy television series. More exactly, it is from the 6th episode of Blackadder goes forth, and was first broadcast on the 2nd November 1989, and presumably written not long before. This means that the scriptwriter (Ben Elton) most probably would have not consulted actual soldiers, nor had been there himself. Indeed, Ben Elton was born in 1959, making it impossible for him to have been a soldier, and anyone he would interview would have to be at least 88, and I doubt that the scriptwriter would go to such lengths. However, what it does do is base itself on common opinions. Since, as I have previously mentioned, the common view was that of the soldier of his family, it would have been based on soldiers' views. If this was taken alone, it would make the source very useful. Also, the scriptwriter would have unconscious bias against the generals, simply from the society. ...read more.

Conclusion

He would therefore not only have conscious bias due to his feeling of loyalty to his family, but would also have unconscious bias due to his father's bringing up. Earl Haig mentions what the old soldiers thought. However, he would not have actually talked to them, but would have just heard his father saying this. In turn, Field Marshall Haig would not have had very accurate reports on his soldiers' attitudes to his plans, for the simple reason that they would have been afraid to say anything bad about them. This stops the source from being reliable for soldiers' opinions. An unreliable source is rarely useful by itself. Furthermore, Earl Haig's purpose in saying this would be to somewhat rescue his father's reputation; therefore he may have been inclined to bend the truth somewhat. In conclusion, Earl Haig's quote is an attempt to rescue his father's reputation based on unreliable information given to him by his father. It is unreliable, and since a historian can't tell whether what he says is true or not, it is in no way useful in finding out what soldiers thought about generals, especially Haig. Leszek Swirski Question 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. World war 1

    In this source Haig is uncaring because he doesn't care about his men and shows he is an unintelligent commander because he wants to win the war by, 'sacrifice of men's lives'. On the other hand we could say that Haig is saying this to warn the nation.

  2. Describe the conditions that soldiers experienced on the western front in the years 1915-1917.

    This shows how important it was for the Allied forces, that the attack was to be made. Haig was confident of victory. He knew that if the Germans were to be defeated there would be a chance that they would surrender.

  1. 'Lions Led by Donkeys'. Using the information in the sources and your own knowledge, ...

    He also described men running into uncut wire and many men being mowed down by machine gun fire. He describes how enemy spy planes knew what they were doing so it was impossible to advance more than 4,000 yards. He finally described the soldiers carrying 5lbs of packs which would have made it very hard to advance.

  2. Did The First World War Liberate British Women?

    Source B1 states "Their coachmen, their gardeners, the very labourers on the estate have votes, while the mistress who employs and pays them is not considered competent to give this simple vote." I think this is a key statement in the argument for women's suffrage, it shows not only the attitude of people, but the attitude of parliament as well.

  1. How useful are sources A, B and C to an historian studying the attitudes ...

    The series is set in a trench in Flanders so it is quite possible that the battle had other objectives). This source differs from Source A in the way that it was the sergeant major that was being negative about generals rather than a low level solider.

  2. Britain And The Western Front of World War One - Sources Questions

    This source shows Haig was out of touch with the way his army lived. Question 14: How does the evidence in source M support the view that the battle of the Somme was badly planned? It is shown to have been badly planned because the men had to carry over

  1. Haig in sources

    down before they were any where near the trenches because an oncoming horse is a bit obvious. A cavalry charge deployed in the western front was useless, because war had changed since he had active combat in Sudan and the Boer War and Field Marshal Haig never visited the western front or the Somme.

  2. How useful are the sources A, B and C in understanding what the battle ...

    Sources B and C are useful to show what the people of Britain were lead to believe, showing that censorship and propaganda affected everything that the people knew, but source A is useful to show what the soldiers were really like when the navy finally arrived to help them.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work