• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How useful are Sources A, B and C to an historian studying the attitudes of British soldiers to their commanders during the First World War? Use Sources A to C and knowledge form your studies in your answer

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

1. Evaluation of sources for their utility How useful are Sources A, B and C to an historian studying the attitudes of British soldiers to their commanders during the First World War? Use Sources A to C and knowledge form your studies in your answer. Source A is a cartoon from the British magazine Punch. Punch was known for its attention to detail, therefore at the very least the source is reliable, and therefore can be useful. Although I have not managed to find any information on the picture on the internet, its style and design suggest that it was done during the time of the war, or just after. The fact that it is ridiculing generals suggests the latter; however Punch is a controversial magazine, so this is not definite. Either way, the author had a good opportunity to have accurate information, straight from the soldiers who had been on the front and in the rehearsals, but weren't currently serving. Indeed, the source would most probably have these soldiers' opinions as its origin. ...read more.

Middle

However, to be fully useful, other sources would have to be used to verify these assumptions. Source B is a quote from a comedy television series. More exactly, it is from the 6th episode of Blackadder goes forth, and was first broadcast on the 2nd November 1989, and presumably written not long before. This means that the scriptwriter (Ben Elton) most probably would have not consulted actual soldiers, nor had been there himself. Indeed, Ben Elton was born in 1959, making it impossible for him to have been a soldier, and anyone he would interview would have to be at least 88, and I doubt that the scriptwriter would go to such lengths. However, what it does do is base itself on common opinions. Since, as I have previously mentioned, the common view was that of the soldier of his family, it would have been based on soldiers' views. If this was taken alone, it would make the source very useful. Also, the scriptwriter would have unconscious bias against the generals, simply from the society. ...read more.

Conclusion

He would therefore not only have conscious bias due to his feeling of loyalty to his family, but would also have unconscious bias due to his father's bringing up. Earl Haig mentions what the old soldiers thought. However, he would not have actually talked to them, but would have just heard his father saying this. In turn, Field Marshall Haig would not have had very accurate reports on his soldiers' attitudes to his plans, for the simple reason that they would have been afraid to say anything bad about them. This stops the source from being reliable for soldiers' opinions. An unreliable source is rarely useful by itself. Furthermore, Earl Haig's purpose in saying this would be to somewhat rescue his father's reputation; therefore he may have been inclined to bend the truth somewhat. In conclusion, Earl Haig's quote is an attempt to rescue his father's reputation based on unreliable information given to him by his father. It is unreliable, and since a historian can't tell whether what he says is true or not, it is in no way useful in finding out what soldiers thought about generals, especially Haig. Leszek Swirski Question 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. World war 1

    This source supports the idea that, 'Haig was an uncaring general who sacrificed the lives of his soldiers fro no good reason', because commanders are meant to try and win wars by losing as less men as possible, not the other way round.

  2. 'Lions Led by Donkeys'. Using the information in the sources and your own knowledge, ...

    This source is very reliable as it is a genuine list of dead soldiers but it is only a small amount of soldiers who did die, so from this source we do not have the total amount of soldiers dead.

  1. Britain And The Western Front of World War One - Sources Questions

    This source shows Haig was out of touch with the way his army lived. Question 14: How does the evidence in source M support the view that the battle of the Somme was badly planned? It is shown to have been badly planned because the men had to carry over

  2. Field Marshal Haig.

    Haig was not disheartened by these heavy losses , he wrote . Very successful attack this morning . All went like clockwork , the battle is going very well for us and already the Germans are surrendering freely . The enemy is so short of men that he is collecting them from all parts of the line .

  1. How useful are sources A, B and C to an historian studying the attitudes ...

    The series is set in a trench in Flanders so it is quite possible that the battle had other objectives). This source differs from Source A in the way that it was the sergeant major that was being negative about generals rather than a low level solider.

  2. Styal Mill - Study sources A, B, C and D. Which of these sources ...

    We know this because it says "Mr. Greg pays doctor Holland for all the medicine and for coming out." Which may suggest why they had little sickness as they could be treated. The final limitation of the source is that the extract is only based upon styal mill, where as the question asks about all mills in

  1. How useful are sources A, B and C to a historian studying the attitudes ...

    I know that some of this source is true because I know from my studies that only the people after the war began to criticize the generals. This is probably the most useful source that gives us an idea of what the soldiers thought of the generals.

  2. Sources A,B and C portray a particular view of the attitudes of British Soldiers ...

    However the television series Blackadder is known as a comedy and so any points made during the programme could have been written with the intention of humour. If this is the case then the source could be slightly un reliable because the statements will have been twisted and exagerated to make them as funny as possible.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work