• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How useful are Sources A, B and C to an historian studying the attitudes of British soldiers to their commanders during the First World War? Use Sources A to C and knowledge form your studies in your answer

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

1. Evaluation of sources for their utility How useful are Sources A, B and C to an historian studying the attitudes of British soldiers to their commanders during the First World War? Use Sources A to C and knowledge form your studies in your answer. Source A is a cartoon from the British magazine Punch. Punch was known for its attention to detail, therefore at the very least the source is reliable, and therefore can be useful. Although I have not managed to find any information on the picture on the internet, its style and design suggest that it was done during the time of the war, or just after. The fact that it is ridiculing generals suggests the latter; however Punch is a controversial magazine, so this is not definite. Either way, the author had a good opportunity to have accurate information, straight from the soldiers who had been on the front and in the rehearsals, but weren't currently serving. Indeed, the source would most probably have these soldiers' opinions as its origin. ...read more.

Middle

However, to be fully useful, other sources would have to be used to verify these assumptions. Source B is a quote from a comedy television series. More exactly, it is from the 6th episode of Blackadder goes forth, and was first broadcast on the 2nd November 1989, and presumably written not long before. This means that the scriptwriter (Ben Elton) most probably would have not consulted actual soldiers, nor had been there himself. Indeed, Ben Elton was born in 1959, making it impossible for him to have been a soldier, and anyone he would interview would have to be at least 88, and I doubt that the scriptwriter would go to such lengths. However, what it does do is base itself on common opinions. Since, as I have previously mentioned, the common view was that of the soldier of his family, it would have been based on soldiers' views. If this was taken alone, it would make the source very useful. Also, the scriptwriter would have unconscious bias against the generals, simply from the society. ...read more.

Conclusion

He would therefore not only have conscious bias due to his feeling of loyalty to his family, but would also have unconscious bias due to his father's bringing up. Earl Haig mentions what the old soldiers thought. However, he would not have actually talked to them, but would have just heard his father saying this. In turn, Field Marshall Haig would not have had very accurate reports on his soldiers' attitudes to his plans, for the simple reason that they would have been afraid to say anything bad about them. This stops the source from being reliable for soldiers' opinions. An unreliable source is rarely useful by itself. Furthermore, Earl Haig's purpose in saying this would be to somewhat rescue his father's reputation; therefore he may have been inclined to bend the truth somewhat. In conclusion, Earl Haig's quote is an attempt to rescue his father's reputation based on unreliable information given to him by his father. It is unreliable, and since a historian can't tell whether what he says is true or not, it is in no way useful in finding out what soldiers thought about generals, especially Haig. Leszek Swirski Question 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. World war 1

    get used to this, 'The nation must be taught to bear losses'. He also says, 'No amount of skill on the part of the high commanders, no training, however good/ will enable victories to be won without the sacrifice of men's lives', this means that they war will only be won by men dieing, not by tactic.

  2. Describe the conditions that soldiers experienced on the western front in the years 1915-1917.

    "He said [commanding officer] 'You'll find the barbed wire in front of the trenches blown away.' Blown away! Nothing of the sort! It was solid as anything. That was the whole trouble. Wrong information. Jack Cousins of the 7th Bedfordshire Regiment describing his version of events at the Somme.

  1. Did The First World War Liberate British Women?

    However men began to publish counter arguments in women's magazines. Source B1 also shows arguments presented by Frederick Ryland in "The Girls Own Paper," in 1896. It is a useful and reliable source as not only was it published in a magazine at the time, it gives us an insight into why men did not support the suffragettes.

  2. How useful are sources A, B and C to an historian studying the attitudes ...

    The series is set in a trench in Flanders so it is quite possible that the battle had other objectives). This source differs from Source A in the way that it was the sergeant major that was being negative about generals rather than a low level solider.

  1. Britain And The Western Front of World War One - Sources Questions

    This source shows Haig was out of touch with the way his army lived. Question 14: How does the evidence in source M support the view that the battle of the Somme was badly planned? It is shown to have been badly planned because the men had to carry over

  2. 'Lions Led by Donkeys'. Using the information in the sources and your own knowledge, ...

    German defenders were on high ground with a good view, their defences were there since the beginning of the war so there dugouts were strong and the barbed wire was more than 30 metres wide making it impossible to penetrate.

  1. Haig in sources

    down before they were any where near the trenches because an oncoming horse is a bit obvious. A cavalry charge deployed in the western front was useless, because war had changed since he had active combat in Sudan and the Boer War and Field Marshal Haig never visited the western front or the Somme.

  2. How useful are the sources A, B and C in understanding what the battle ...

    We could do with a German point of view in one of these sources, because they are all from British men. Of course, all the sources are useful, but they are all useful in different ways. Like source A is fairly reliable, and shows a fairly balanced point, but the other two sources are exaggerated.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work