• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How useful are sources A, B and C to an historian studying the attitudes of British soldiers to their commanders during the First World War? Use sources A to C and knowledge from your studies in your answer.

Extracts from this document...


History Coursework 1. How useful are sources A, B and C to an historian studying the attitudes of British soldiers to their commanders during the First World War? Use sources A to C and knowledge from your studies in your answer. Source A shows a cartoon, which represents a view of soldiers' attitudes towards their general. It is a cartoon from the First World War period, which means it is a primary source. It was published by the British magazine 'Punch' which was around during the First World War. After some research I found out that the 'Punch' magazine was known to be satirical and a humorous magazine which was influenced heavily by the use of cartoons. The cartoons put a strong viewpoint across of how some people felt, even though the publishers used humour to put across their ideas to the reader. I think the cartoons must have been some what useful to historians studying them, as they put across ideas of some people. The source shows a Major General addressing his men, the caption beneath the cartoon is showing in a humorous way what the soldier actually thinks about the General. I think the soldier in the cartoon thinks of the General as being cowardly as he never comes to the front line during the war. ...read more.


The battle of the Somme was one of the most bloody of the First World War; more British soldiers had been killed than in any other battle before it. It earned Haig the title 'Butcher of the Somme', after he unnecessarily sent thousands of British troops to their deaths. Source C is written by Earl Haig, the son of Field Marshal Haig it was published in a newspaper in 1998, this is a secondary source. The source is telling us what the son of Field Marshal Haig thought of him, he thinks of his father as being a 'great man' and should be given credit for the job he did and the victories he achieved during the First World War. The source is likely to be biased as he is the son and he will do anything to make his father seem honourable and a respected man and so it may be quite inaccurate and thus making it insufficient evidence. The source does however share the same view as John Keegan's interpretation. More sources need to be analysed before I can conclude that there is sufficient evidence to support John Keegan's interpretation. Source D shows a poster which is been edited to mock Haig. ...read more.


Source K is written for a GCSE textbook and is therefore not likely to be biased in any way and is likely to give solid sound interpretations. Source K believes that the blame cannot be all put on Haig as he was ultimately victorious which is the part, which agrees with the interpretation. But, this source shows the other side as well and that he did make the mistakes, which killed thousands. I believe that this is a very reliable and unbiased account. To conclude the essay, I must state that overall there was not enough sufficient evidence in the sources to agree with Keegan's interpretation. The majority of the sources which I analysed were highly critical of Haig and his character. This is understandable as he did make mistakes and the losses of life were immense. However the sources analysed were mostly opinions, thus making the sources biased towards or against Haig. I believe that the interpretation of Keegan was too inflated and that Field Marshal Haig did make many mistakes leading to many soldiers death. However it was his persistence that one the battles but as a result huge losses of life were encountered. By Harvinder Singh Daurka (11T) Mr Thompson ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    What Were the Consequences of the First World War for the British People 1914 ...

    4 star(s)

    So even before the war women's suffrage was becoming recognised by the government, even some became supporters. There are numerous takes on why the suffragettes and suffragists won them the vote. The fact that they stopped campaigning during the war period meant they would gain some respect from the public

  2. General Haig - Butcher or Hero?

    was a loss for Germany and a gain for the allies, making the odds easier for the allies. During the war, new technology was developed to the allies' favour. Although tanks had first been used during the battle of the Somme they were unreliable and often broke down.

  1. 'Lions Led by Donkeys' How Valid is this Interpretation of the Conduct of the ...

    Pearson hated the fact that someone who had never been any closer than 50 kilometres behind the trenches and had no idea what life was like down there! The soldiers were brave and were putting there lives in jeopardy whilst Haig is so far behind the Front-line ordering soldiers to there deaths.

  2. General Haig doesn't care about his soldiers.

    either what Haig was trying to achieve or the Battle of the Somme and are therefore useless to someone trying to study the Battle of the Somme of General Haig. Having said that both Sources have to have some historical relevance or they wouldn't be funny.

  1. 'Lions led by Donkeys' Use The Information In The Sources And Your Own Knowledge ...

    We know these statements are not true just by looking at sources A, C and D as most of the men that were alive were very angry with Haig and thought that he should be hung and were not in much of a splendid spirit.

  2. Was General Haig a donkey or a great commander?

    Unfortunately the Germans were not stupid, and had realised that Passchendaele was very important to their war effort, fortifying it so that it became one of their most strongly defended positions. The Germans occupied the high ground on the sickle shaped ridge, while the British were forced to stay in

  1. World war 1

    Both officers know that this is stupid, "You mean 'Are we all going to get killed?' Yes", they are frightened they are going to die. This source gives a vivid impression of the slaughter involved in going 'over the top'.

  2. Some people have the view that British generals like Haig were incompetent leaders. How ...

    Diaries are not intended for public use, therefore the writer will write his true opinions in the diary entry, however the opinion will obviously biased, and his opinion is clear in the source that leaders like Haig should be ?hung, drawn and quartered?.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work