• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Is there sufficient evidence in sources A-G to explain why the Gallipoli campaign failed?

Extracts from this document...


Is there sufficient evidence in sources A-G to explain why the Gallipoli campaign failed? The evidence given in sources A-G covers several factors which contributed to the failure of the Gallipoli campaign. Firstly, source A, David Barkers interpretation of the Anzac soldiers shows them to be tired and unkempt this idea is backed up by source B which quotes, 'The men were kept too long and too thick in the trenches; they became lethargic after 5 days.' However we are not given information about the conditions of Gallipoli which played a key role in the breakdown of the soldiers. For example, we know that the medical services couldn't cope with the vast number of casualties. On the first day alone 5000 men were either killed or injured; however the medical services only had the facilities to cope with 500 of these men. Disease spread quickly through the trenches due to flies and the corpses of dead soldiers being left to rot in the hot weather. ...read more.


'Twice it failed allegedly from lack of men and supplies.' The quote 'it failed rather from lack of room' also supports Source F, the map of the Gallipoli peninsula where we can clearly see the narrow route in which the soldiers tried to break through. However the provenance of this particular source is questionable. The source was written by a British historian in 1965, 50 years after the Gallipoli campaign; the fact that the author is British could also suggest that there is a possibility that he is bias towards Britain's role in the Gallipoli campaign. Source E was also written sometime after the war; in 2001 and points out several important factors of the failure of the Gallipoli campaign. Firstly, Winston Churchill's role in the campaign, 'His errors of judgement'. Secondly, the fact that 'the British vastly underestimated their task' and also due to 'poorly trained troops and applying poorly trained tactics. ...read more.


The provenance of this source is also doubtful as it was filmed 65 years after Gallipoli and also because it is a film; which are usually for entertainment purposes rather that factual information. In conclusion I do not think there is sufficient evidence in sources A-G to explain why the Gallipoli campaign failed. Although there is a wide range of causes discussed in the sources there is not enough information regarding certain aspects. For example, the conditions at Gallipoli; such as the lack of water and disease. The landscape of the Gallipoli peninsula - from a geographical perspective the Turks had an advantage right from the beginning due to their positioning on the cliffs. The tactics, for instance the barbed wire underneath the water which resulted in many soldiers dying as they left their boats. And also the lack of co-ordination between the naval and armed forces which resulted in widespread confusion and chaos. With such information I would be able to gain a better perspective of why the Gallipoli campaign failed. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. Do the sources provided give sufficient evidence to fully explain what happened in Belfast ...

    Though it too is commenting on the result of the 15/16 April raid its usefulness is very limited as it's very brief and does not agree with the table or report. It claims "a small number of people were killed" in contrast to the 'heavy' casualties stated in the other two and research evidence backs up the others.

  2. The Gallipoli campaign in 1914 went down as one of the worst military failures ...

    Churchill hadn't wished making life very hard for the English and French military. His plan was to send warships through the Dardanelles which seemed a satisfactory plan, but they were sunk and damaged by mines which in Churchill's defence were unforceable but was a big setback for the campaign.

  1. Who was responsible for what went wrong at Gallipoli?

    Source E gives a good insight into the theory of poor planning. It is an original source even though the soldiers in question were writing after the war. It tells us of how badly organised the troops were at various beaches and it even claims that come troops did nothing all day!

  2. Source H suggests that poor planning and Winston Churchill were responsible for what went ...

    Obviously the planning was never meticulous. It is notable that when the Allies landed, according to A.J.P Taylor, it was a total success and Stopford (the Allied commander) decide to take a "nap" instead of pressing home the advantage that they had, which was that there were almost no defenses at the time between them and Constantinople.

  1. Why was it Important that the Gallipoli Campaign should succeed?

    Therefore if they opened another front, then troops would have to be diverted from elsewhere and put more strain on the enemy's resources. Otherwise they might collapse and cause great disaster not just for Russia alone. However this campaign was not just to relieve pressure it was to free the

  2. Is there sufficient evidence in sources A to F to explain why the Gallipoli ...

    They didn't have adequate medical supplies and for many men it seemed that as soon as you became injured you didn't fight again, also many of the soldiers in the trenches had to fight after being in there for days and days.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work