• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"John Keegan, a modern military historian, suggests that Haig was an 'efficient and highly skilled soldier who did much to lead Britain to victory in the First World War'.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"John Keegan, a modern military historian, suggests that Haig was an 'efficient and highly skilled soldier who did much to lead Britain to victory in the First World War'. Is there sufficient evidence in Sources A to H to support this interpretation?" Source A supports this claim as it is a positive piece of writing about general Haig, then again it was written by him, therefore is full of lies and deceit. E.g.: "A considerable proportion of the German soldiers are now practically beaten men" His head of intelligence, John Charters, fabricated this information; nether the less this is still a positive piece of writing. Source B, greatly disagrees with John Keegan's view of Haig as it is a very negative poster aimed at Haig's uselessness and how the people at home didn't want him anymore, the text: "Your country needs me... like a hole in the head" Proves this and then written underneath: "Which is what most of you are going to get." ...read more.

Middle

Charters: "The barbed wire has never been cut so well" "(iii)", written on the day of the battle is full of lies, as the first day of the battle is well known to have been a disaster and there fore stating that "Al went like clockwork" does not represent Haig in a positive way. But at the time no one was the wiser so this would have shown Haig in good light. Source D, I believe is against Haig as it shows him to be somewhat insane: "his belief that he had been chosen by God to serve his country." And also shows him to be somewhat idiotic and too proud of himself: "It was probably this inability to recognise defeat that led to his continuing attacks on the Somme" But then again this is written by a modern historian in 1989 therefore is not a current account and less accurate. Source E, is also against Haig and comments on how he was too proud to accept defeat along with the rest of his army: "the ...read more.

Conclusion

for the disaster of the battle of the Somme: "if he had ever been replaced, would there have been anyone better for the job?" This is written some time after the battle so reflects upon it, therefore is less accurate. Source H (Haig: BBC TV 'Timewatch'.), was again very negative towards Haig, and showed soldiers accounts of their personal opinions of Haig and their personal tragedies of the war. One man even stated that Haig was the 'biggest donkey of them all'. As the people seemed very old the stories could have changed and accounts could have become twisted, this makes it less accurate. When I weigh out the positive and negative opinions of Haig they match each other, this may be why there is some debate over whether he was a genius or a fool, but I believe that as the majority of positive opinions are that of his own, I must agree with the man on the video when I say Haig was the biggest donkey of then all. Nic. Locock - 1 - ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. Dunkirk - Defeat, Deliverance or Victory?

    Some men had been on the beach for the duration of the evacuation so it was not surprising that men were frustrated tired and wanted no further part to play in the war. Soldiers felt frustrated because there was nothing they could do, because the army had very little equipment.

  2. Evacuation in Britain during World War II

    I do not know exactly who created the source. I think the aim of the source was just simply to give information on where the reception area were in the war for evacuees. This source will help me to answer questions like, "where evacuees went", What types of places did they go" ect.

  1. Explain how well Haigs background and military experience had prepared him for command of ...

    How far do you agree with this judgement of his record? General Haig will always be looked at with disdain, and many people who know little about him think of him being an evil person, butchering people. He did not directly kill anyone, but his tactics of war lead to

  2. How important were Haig's tactics in bringing an end to WW1?

    Wilson said that America was neutral he had already made them financially involved with the Allies. Although it was not just the money that drew America into the war onto the side of the Allies. America's ships in the Atlantic Ocean were being attacked and sunk by the German U-boats.

  1. Dunkirk - Defeat, Deliverance or Victory?

    This source would be slightly biased in that the evacuation was probably a lot more orderly once the retreat was further underway. Also, this memory is recollected a significant time after the event, and his memory might be blurred, but I don't think this would have a notable effect on his interpretation.

  2. Was General Haig a donkey or a great commander?

    Eventually the main target would be reached, or at least that was the plan, and the offensive would be complete. Many people believe that breakthrough was impractical due to the ineffectiveness of the cavalry in breaching a line. One of these was James Edmond, an Official British Historian, who also

  1. Defeat, Deliverance or Victory? Which of these best describes Dunkirk?

    fishing boats, barges and pleasure craft needed to ferry troops from the gently shelving Dunkirk beaches to the larger boats. Other sources showing Dunkirk as calm well ordered and well improvised are 1,2,5(i),5(ii),6,7,8,9,11,14,15,16,19and 21. Deliverance was also a very important aspect of Dunkirk as this large number of coincidences helped the British to achieve this Victory.

  2. John Keegan, a modern military historian, suggests that Haig was a "highly skilled, effective ...

    Both sources are written as studies of Haig, but this is where the similarity ends. Source K also talks about the rest of Haig's campaign, and although it does not put forward attrition as a good tactic, it does nevertheless acknowledge that in a stationary war, there is little else which can be done.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work