• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"John Keegan, a modern military historian, suggests that Haig was an 'efficient and highly skilled soldier who did much to lead Britain to victory in the First World War'.

Extracts from this document...


"John Keegan, a modern military historian, suggests that Haig was an 'efficient and highly skilled soldier who did much to lead Britain to victory in the First World War'. Is there sufficient evidence in Sources A to H to support this interpretation?" Source A supports this claim as it is a positive piece of writing about general Haig, then again it was written by him, therefore is full of lies and deceit. E.g.: "A considerable proportion of the German soldiers are now practically beaten men" His head of intelligence, John Charters, fabricated this information; nether the less this is still a positive piece of writing. Source B, greatly disagrees with John Keegan's view of Haig as it is a very negative poster aimed at Haig's uselessness and how the people at home didn't want him anymore, the text: "Your country needs me... like a hole in the head" Proves this and then written underneath: "Which is what most of you are going to get." ...read more.


Charters: "The barbed wire has never been cut so well" "(iii)", written on the day of the battle is full of lies, as the first day of the battle is well known to have been a disaster and there fore stating that "Al went like clockwork" does not represent Haig in a positive way. But at the time no one was the wiser so this would have shown Haig in good light. Source D, I believe is against Haig as it shows him to be somewhat insane: "his belief that he had been chosen by God to serve his country." And also shows him to be somewhat idiotic and too proud of himself: "It was probably this inability to recognise defeat that led to his continuing attacks on the Somme" But then again this is written by a modern historian in 1989 therefore is not a current account and less accurate. Source E, is also against Haig and comments on how he was too proud to accept defeat along with the rest of his army: "the ...read more.


for the disaster of the battle of the Somme: "if he had ever been replaced, would there have been anyone better for the job?" This is written some time after the battle so reflects upon it, therefore is less accurate. Source H (Haig: BBC TV 'Timewatch'.), was again very negative towards Haig, and showed soldiers accounts of their personal opinions of Haig and their personal tragedies of the war. One man even stated that Haig was the 'biggest donkey of them all'. As the people seemed very old the stories could have changed and accounts could have become twisted, this makes it less accurate. When I weigh out the positive and negative opinions of Haig they match each other, this may be why there is some debate over whether he was a genius or a fool, but I believe that as the majority of positive opinions are that of his own, I must agree with the man on the video when I say Haig was the biggest donkey of then all. Nic. Locock - 1 - ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. Dunkirk - Defeat, Deliverance or Victory?

    source is very negative towards the Allies this would suggest that it is reasonably reliable. This source is also one-persons account of the evacuation, so this incident may be an isolated one. Morale was low in the armed forces due many soldiers dying and men not knowing when they would be evacuated.

  2. How important were Haig's tactics in bringing an end to WW1?

    Beginning with a British drive (August 8-11) into the German lines around Amiens, the Allies began the offensive that three months later resulted in German capitulation. During the last week of August and the first three days of September, British and French forces won the Second Battle of the Somme

  1. Defeat, Deliverance or Victory? Which of these best describes Dunkirk?

    But he does not mention how many troops were on the beach in the first place; therefore he leaves the number of troops that died out. Without this information the number of troops saved may look like a lot, but in reality comparing the number of troops saved with the

  2. Dunkirk - Defeat, Deliverance or Victory?

    A former soldier named W.B.A Gaze writes the second source. This source suggests panic and desperation during the evacuation. He recollected what he saw on the beaches on the night of 27 May 1940. He describes how bombers constantly bombed them every ten minutes and soldiers would simply have to crouch in minute holes they had dug.

  1. Was General Haig a donkey or a great commander?

    If these could be captured, it might have meant the end of the war. Up until then Lloyd George, the British Prime Minister had not been willing to support Haig in any of his campaigns.

  2. John Keegan, a modern military historian, suggests that Haig was an 'efficient and highly ...

    Britain would have then stood alone, a position from which they would have been very unlikely to win the war. However, this source was written by Haig's son, in defence of his father's actions in the First World War, so needs to be treated with caution as it is biased.

  1. Evacuation in Britain during World War II

    But on the other hand it is not bias because you cannot show what Britain did to Germany in the same picture. It is very possible that there is a missing paired photo. Personally I don't think there is any emotion shown in the photo because it is not like there are people in the street crying with sad faces.

  2. Is there sufficient evidence in sources C to L to support this interpretation? "Haig ...

    Source E: Before the battle begins, he admits there will be heavy losses. "The nation must be prepared to see heavy casualty lists." He also says that this is an unavoidable sacrifice that was essential for victory. This shows that he was in fact correct about how his tactic was

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work