• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"Overall, Haig must be judged a successful commander" - Discuss.

Extracts from this document...


"Overall, Haig must be judged a successful commander". Field Marshal Douglas Haig was one of the most controversial people of the Great War. While he brought eventual victory, he is accused of being responsible for the deaths of tens of thousands of young men during 1916 and beyond. I will begin by looking at source C and the opinions of the fighting man on Haig. Fred Pearson was an infantryman that fought under Haig, and so might not have ever met him. His thoughts on Haig are in an angry, annoyed tone, saying that he's "very bitter, always have been and always will be" and talks about Haig being "50 kilometres behind the line and that's about as near as he ever got." This source is reliable as far as facts go - Haig was that far away. The rest of the source is personal opinion, but one that seems to be shared by other men of the time. ...read more.


A similar situation occurred two years later at Passchendaele, in which he continued to throw troops forward long after his target was no longer tactically viable. Source D tries to see reasons behind Haig's tactics, and is made up of opinions on the man. From looking at Haig's own journal and other sources, this source seems reliable. It talks about that perhaps "his greatest failing was his constant, misplaced optimism." From Haig's journal, he commented that "the men are in splendid spirits...full of confidence" the day before, saying also that "the wire has never been so well cut", which is simply untrue. The wire had not been cut, and hundreds of men were slaughtered on it. On the first day of the battle, in which almost 20,000 people died (the biggest casualties on one day that the British army has ever seen), he said that it all "went like clockwork" and that the troops are in "wonderful spirits and full of confidence" In fact, that day has been said by modern historians to have "left a scar on the British people forever". ...read more.


However, Source E's final point says that "although some people criticise the cost of his methods, they do not offer other methods." This is very debatable. There are several things Haig could have done to reduce the mass loss of life. Firstly, and most obviously, he could have removed the bombardment. It made the wire worse, churned up no-man's land making it impossible to walk through, and warned the Germans of the attack. This point was proven in 1918 at Amiens: this attack was not began by bombardment, and so was astoundingly successful (to begin with). Some have also suggested that he should have simply stopped the attack; the Germans advance had already been halted. He could have also used similar tactics that the Germans used at Verdun - instead of masses of men going over the top, small amounts of well armed, well trained men would pick open weak points in the line. So, in conclusion, it is possible to support the opening statement from the sources - although it is also quite possible to judge the opposite. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. General Haig - Butcher or Hero?

    This seems indeed that they won against overwhelming odds. In attempts to break the stalemate of the western front, enormous casualties were entailed. There were many major conflicts lost before the final victory. When the British attacked on the River Somme, there were over 500,000 casualties.

  2. How important were Haig's tactics in bringing an end to WW1?

    I do not think that it played hardly any role in the war at all. Therefore, in conclusion on new technology, apart from heavy artillery and the machine gun the role it played was insignificant. The gas did nothing except kill 3000 British troops in the whole war and a 1500 Germans.

  1. Was General Haig a donkey or a great commander?

    Nevertheless it is true that Haig was caught in a gap between two periods of development, as warfare had developed more quickly than the art of communication. Not long before the First World War battles were led by the generals from the front, and mostly consisted of cavalry charges.

  2. Dunkirk - Defeat, Deliverance or Victory?

    The source should be unbiased since AJP Taylor is a very well known historian. It is written for a well-informed textbook and the use of primary statistics is used to back up his ideas. However he fails to mention the number of casualties at the Dunkirk beaches and fails to

  1. The Battle of Passchendaele

    Haig was very ambitious and had lots of self-belief. He didn't change his tactics when things were going wrong. He also believed in older methods of communication and the runners taking the messages could be shot at and it was very slow. After the Battle Haig was severely criticised for continuing with the attacks long after the operation had lost any real strategic value.

  2. How Successful Was Daniel Kleinman in meeting the brief of the Charity?

    The ventriloquist act is very appropriate for several reasons- Firstly; it is a great allegory of how the man completely rules her life- so much that she has stopped being a real human being and is just controlled by him.

  1. Field Marshal Haig.

    At first Joffe intended to use mainly French soldiers but the German attack on Verdum in February 1916 turned the Somme offensive into a large scale British diversionary attack . General Haig now took over responsibility for the operation .

  2. Haig: Butcher or Serious Commander?

    Sources D and E both describe the events of 1 July 1916. Source D was printed on 3 July 1916 in the Daily Express, and is a very favourable account of the first day. It leaves the reader little choice but to notice the successes of the BEF, and even less choice to hear of the failures and losses.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work