Reconstruction is defined as the period following the Civil War.

Authors Avatar

Ramy Abdel-Nabi

Reconstruction Essay Re-write

        Reconstruction is defined as the period following the Civil War in which the Republican-dominated Federal government sought to reunite the Union; the measure included drastically remodeling Southern society in order to secure equality and independence for blacks through granting them various freedoms. Many historians believe that in order to fully understand the modern United States, one must understand Reconstruction. Studying it, therefore, has been a top priority amongst historians. Over the years, three main schools of thought have developed concerning Reconstruction. The Dunning School viewed the Northern Republicans as tyrannical leaders who pushed aside the governments in the South set up by Johnson, and viewed the emancipated slaves as incompetent children incapable of handling their newly accumulated freedoms. The Revisionist School, which followed the Dunning School, argued that the Republicans were the liberating heroes, leaving the Southern white supremacists as the villains. The most recent of the three, the Post-Revisionist School, argued that the Radical Republicans were not all that radical. Their policies were too conservative and weak to make any drastic or lasting changes. Through studying these three schools, it can be seen that, regarding any positive short-term effects, Reconstruction can only be see as a failure; however, during Reconstruction, the roots of a black community were planted that would later flourish into the Civil Rights movements of the 1960’s and the modern black community. The following paragraphs will discuss it ultimate failure but long-term effects through the arguments of James Burns of the Post-Revisionist school and Eric Foner of the Revisionist school.

Join now!

        One of the main goals in gaining complete black autonomy was land ownership and economic independence for blacks. Following the Civil War, many blacks argued that their hard work as slaves entitled them to a portion of their former masters’ land. Southern whites, however, denied the blacks of this arguable right. It was left up to the state governments to take action and issue land distribution plans. The strong opposition from whites and even some Republicans to black land ownership, based on racism and fears of economic instability, stifled any government action. Left in poverty, many blacks, Burns argues, were ...

This is a preview of the whole essay