• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Source 1 suggest life in the trenches were great, however source 2 and 3 tell a different story. Source 2 and 3 gives the impression of life being horrendous in the trenches. Source 1 is a postcard which promotes Golden Dawn cigarettes.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Hemali 9a 2/12/09 Yr 9 History Assessment on The Great War. 1) The life of a soldier isolated from the normal world is complicated. Source 1 suggest life in the trenches were great, however source 2 and 3 tell a different story. Source 2 and 3 gives the impression of life being horrendous in the trenches. Source 1 is a postcard which promotes Golden Dawn cigarettes. It shows soldiers with happy faces, but in the real war this is not true. This postcard only shows one weapon, 'the rifle', in fact there were many more weapons such as using gas or even tanks. These to sources both agree on the sight and smell of the bodies. Source 2 mentions that hundreds and thousands of bodies were found and they did not only consist of the allies. Source 2 was similar to source 3, but source 3 says that there were animals decaying as well. This helps us to compare the sources and to find out which would be of more value to history of the war. ...read more.

Middle

However this source is an auto biography and people are more likely to say good things about them. In source 2 we know instantly that it was a British soldier who wrote the auto biography because it says 'not merely ours but the Germans as well.' This proves that it wasn't a German soldier and thought the extract it mention digging through the Frenchmen bodies. Source 3 also gives evidence that the quotation might have been a French guy because it mentions 'At Verdun', and the French fought at Verdun. This source may not have been from one guy because it has many different quotes which could have been taken from another person. Source 2 is a secondary source but it contains contemporary elements. The historian is not involved so that would make him not biased and he has time to look at different points of view; but he was not a witness so that makes his information less useful. Source 3 could have been tampered with, the historian could have changed some parts of it. ...read more.

Conclusion

It only shows one weapon and not any other like Gas and tanks. This source may be biased, so it is not trust worthy. I think the historian should study different sources and then come to a conclusion combining the sources together. 4) Although source 3 is not reliable to an historian it still is useful. It contains some information about soldiers and the trenches. The postcard shows the soldiers quite deep in the trenches, this tells us that the trenches were quite deep and wide. Also it gives a rough outline of a soldier's uniform, and on the picture you can just about see the soldier is carrying a bag, which is strapped around him; and in the bag there is a water bottle and some other stuff. It helps us know that soldiers were sending letters home because the soldier standing up is holding a letter in hid hand. It still shows one weapon the rifle. Lastly we can see the floor is rocky and pebbly; so it must have been hard to dig in through tough ground. ?? ?? ?? ?? Hemali 9a :) ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. World War 1-Life in the Trenches

    Source A doesn't talk about barbed wire, whereas a lot of the text in Source C is about barbed wire. Though source C does say that it was very wet in some parts of the trenches. There is only one idea regular in all the sources- that there was a lot of water at some point.

  2. World war 1

    This design was also used to stop enemy soldiers getting into the trench and killing everyone; if the trench was a straight line, an enemy soldier could get in there and kill everyone; however they were a zigzag shape which meant that if they did enter the trench they couldn't kill the people around the corner.

  1. "Evacuation was a great success" Do you agree? Source based work.

    However one must take into account the fact that the source is a photograph hence it could have been staged. Source B contradicts this and suggests that evacuation was a nerve-racking experience for the children involved as they were "too afraid to talk".

  2. Jarrow: questions 3, 4 and 5 (sources)

    It is just Ellen Wilkinson's point of view. Also Ellen Wilkinson named the book "the town that got murdered" from the title we can tell that Ellen Wilkinson has her own strong views on Jarrow and the government and it is not balanced information and the source is limited.

  1. The Somme - source related study.

    "They dig better than our men and consequently, their losses are probably less." This was true and therefore on 1st July, 1916, after the British bombardment lifted on to the German reserve lines, the Germans were still there, "live and kicking" to fight the British back.

  2. Votes For Women - Source related study.

    In September 1907 the Women's Freedom League was established - it worked alongside the WSPU but did not use the same amount of violence. While both groups still campaigned as avidly as before, the small split did not help their cause.

  1. Evacuation was a great success - do you agree or disagree.

    There were reports of children 'fouling' gardens, hair crawling with lice, and bed wetting.' Even in today's working and poorer classes, no such atrocities occur; they are dealt with immediately by the school or General Practitioner. It is therefore quite understandable that the country folk were indeed shocked.

  2. What was life like for fighting men on the Western Front?

    As a weapon, they were not very effective but their key role was that they terrified the French and British soldiers. Grenades. The grenades used in World War I were very effective. The specialist regiment that threw the grenades were called The Grenadiers.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work