• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Source A and Source B struggle to agree on the causes of prohibition. I can, however see one similarity. This similarity is emphasised far more in Source B than A. It is that alcohol is evil and saloons were a bad influence on the men of America.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

a) Source A and Source B struggle to agree on the causes of prohibition. I can, however see one similarity. This similarity is emphasised far more in Source B than A. It is that alcohol is evil and saloons were a bad influence on the men of America. This is the only explanation given by Source B. Whereas Source A gives us many. Both sources seem to agree that Prohibition should have been introduced. However, they do have two different points of view on alcohol. Source A, taken from an American History book, published in 1973, sends out the impression that alcohol was a bad thing, however it was not as bad as everyone is making it out to be. The main feeling in Source A is that it was not patriotic to drink alcohol. There was still a very strong feeling against the Germans in America at this time. Apart from this and the bad influence of saloons, Source A struggles to supply any other logical reasons why the law should have been passed. Source A is very quick to point out the complete failures of prohibition. Source B, also taken from a book abut American history, published in 1979, does not give any real reasons why Prohibition was passed as a law. ...read more.

Middle

In 1920 there were absolutely no drunk drivers. By 1923 there were 645 drunk drivers and by 1925 that figure had risen to 820. In 1925 there were 37,048 more, people arrested for being drunk, than in 1920. The only figure that has dropped was people arrested for drunk and disorderly conduct, which, however did rise between 1920 and 1923, but dropped by a couple of thousand in 1925. Overall, both Source G and Source H show the complete failure of prohibition. The authorities may have become more strict, however all the figures were supposed to fall, they have, however, on the whole, all risen. e) Source I goes along way to proving that Source J is telling the truth. Both Sources have the same messages. The whole system of Prohibition was corrupt. Source I is a picture of the leading authorities in Prohibition. It sums up how corrupt the whole system was. The people who were supposed to be insuring that the law was kept were actually making money out of it. Rather than arrest those who were breaking the law, they were taking bribes from them not to arrest them. This backs up what is said in Source J, by a policeman who is given money when he fails to enforce Prohibition. ...read more.

Conclusion

It is obvious that alcohol was being sold as people were arrested for being drunk. This was probably due to the large numbers of speakeasies, mentioned earlier. Sources I and J both say that Prohibition was a conspiracy. It was used for some of the country's authorities to make money. They were offered and took money not to arrest people for selling alcohol. Source I shows authorities, such as magistrates, politicians and prohibition officers with their hands held out behind their backs. I read this to be that they are holding out their hands for money, bribes. Source J is an account from a Chicago police officer, in 1920, who said that his senior officers were engaged in the massive conspiracy. When he raided a saloon, he said that if he had shut it down, then he would have been transferred to an area where there was little or no work. He also talks of how he was given $75, as a reward. This was said in 1920, which is right at the beginning of Prohibition. If this is happening at the start then how is going to be by the end? Overall, I feel that the Sources all contain some reasons why Prohibition was bound to fail. I feel that the main reason it was not going to work, was that the authorities were more interested in making money and accepting bribes rather than do their job. James FAIRBOURN History Coursework Page 1 of 7 Prohibition ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE USA 1919-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE USA 1919-1941 essays

  1. Source D shows a report from the Jarrow Public Health Committee, published in 1933. ...

    Jarrow's Infant Mortality rate is 114, while the National Average is 57. We can see that babies from Jarrow are more likely to die because they have very high infant mortality rates. It has decreased since 1931 which could be due to an increase in healthcare.

  2. Why was prohibition introduced

    The Government desperately needed money, and taxing alcohol would bring money in to fund the "New Deal". The New Deal was the Government's scheme to take the country out of the Depression, for example, the ABC companies, which helped companies and farmers.

  1. Prohibition - How far does Source I prove the policeman in Source J is ...

    This then led onto massacres and gang violence, such as the Valentines Day Massacre. This Source suggests that Prohibition had been around for a long time for corruption to sink in, as it was produced in the mid-20s, between 1920-1925.

  2. Prohibition was a disaster waiting to happen How far do you agree? I ...

    America was turning in terms of social reasons changing. Immigration was first starting and Americans wanted to protect their nationality against other countries in some kind of way and this was a reason for prohibition because with it legal alcohol sale would stand to a still and people knew most brewers originated from Germany so they felt some kind

  1. The USA: Was prohibition bound to fail?

    Source E is an extremely reliable source, and in its contents it says that prohibition was not "widely supported by public opinion", "drinking has generally increased", "citizens have openly ignored prohibition" and finally "crime has increased to a level never seen before" - these all show that prohibition was clearly unsuccessful.

  2. Study sources I and J, How far does source I prove that the policeman ...

    He is implying that the law was so corrupt he might as well have been drinking as everyone was doing it.

  1. Does the evidence of source C support the evidence of sources A and B ...

    took it, it may not show Jarrow's true living and working conditions. It may be used as propaganda and show people to be ''happy'', whereas they are actually suffering. Overall source C supports source A because it shows that most people in the town were unemployed.

  2. Was Prohibition bound to Fail

    source I the people in the workforce who are meant to try and enforce prohibition are all showing a gesture for a bribe to turn a blind eye to the gangsters. They were corrupt because it says in the Steven Waugh history book that, "nearly 10% of the agents were sacked for taking bribes."

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work