• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Source A is a piece of text written by Haig just before the battle of the Somme (July 1916 to Nov 1916), It explains that in Haig's opinion the nation has to accept the losses of warfare

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Study Sources A & B: How far does Source A prove that Haig did not care about the lives of his men? Source A is a piece of text written by Haig just before the battle of the Somme (July 1916 to Nov 1916), It explains that in Haig's opinion the nation has to accept the losses of warfare. He believes that however well an army is trained and led they will have to bear sacrifices. This is true but not to the extent of the Somme where the allies alone lost a massive 620,000 men. Haig wrote this extract a month before the first attack suggesting that he knew there was going to be a large amount casualties. This also implies that he hadn't made much of an effort to change the tactics and save the lives of men but lazily chose to prepare the nation of heavy losses. In this extract, a stubborn side of Haig has been unleashed with his mind concentrating only on the victory of the battle, no matter what the costs. For example Haig states " a nation must be taught to bear losses" and "no of skill will enable amount of victories to be won, without the sacrifice of men's lives" giving us the impression that his determination for victory would stop at nothing. ...read more.

Middle

about Field Marshall Haig and his drinks cabinet. I think a historian studying Haig and the Somme would find Sources D and E of considerable use. They both show popular ideas of Haig, one at the time of the event and the other 60 years later. As a television series, Source D would present views that the majority of the people agree with in order to boost it's ratings. This suggests that the majority of people agree that Haig was a poor leader. The series 'Blackadder goes Forth' shows both side of war; life in the frontline trenches and then in the General's headquarters. This will give a historian an insight to the conditions of the trenches and that of the headquarters. However, Source D was made 60 years after the war so the director must have made it using sources such as E and other possibly accounts. Source E also shows how men were kitted out and how poorly training would have prepared them for the reality of the war they were about to fight. This is useful as it shows how much thought they gave to the training and equipping of his troops. I think both sources are relevant to a historian studying Haig as they show the view shared by many people, which is always important. ...read more.

Conclusion

Study all the Sources. "Haig was an uncaring General who sacrificed the lives of his soldiers for no good reason" How far do this sources support this views. I believe that these sources do not go far to support this view. This is based on the following: - Sources A and B written by Haig himself, perhaps shows his deficiencies as a modern day leader not necessarily an uncaring butcher. Source C written by written by a private in the army, whilst giving a realistic picture from the trenches could not possible see the overall strategy. Sources D & E whilst relevant in promoting the populist view, again are biased. Sources F, a recently written book, again follows the more popular view and is a better titles to sell books. Sources G is probably the most unbiased view given that it was written by the enemy with little to gain. This source perhaps gives the biggest insight into Haig's strategy. Source H again does not support the view of the question, and was the only sources written by a fellow general who has been trained in warfare. Sources I and J both written by Lloyd George, highlights the difficulty in coming to any conclusion. He contradicts himself and argues convincingly for and against, proving that the question, even with the benefit of hindsight, is a difficult one to answer. Alex Wahnon 4M-4/3 14/11/2004 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. General Haig - Butcher or Hero?

    It would be no surprise that Spanish Influenza hit epidemic height in 1918; with nearly 500,000 civilian lives taken. It hit especially badly on the German side of the trenches, and at one point there were more Germans soldiers being killed by Spanish Influenza than by the allies!

  2. Was General Haig a bad leader, source based

    Although there is a chance that the person writing the textbook is not completely telling the truth. This is because it is a secondary source, which means it came from a primary source, and that source could have been consciously biased.

  1. General Haig doesn't care about his soldiers.

    It also backs Haig's decisions and aggress that the sacrifice of men was for a good reason saying: "Haig was on of the main architects on the Allied victory". To sum up I think that if Haig honestly wanted to save lives then he would have been more tactically sound.

  2. How far was General Douglas Haig Responsible for the Failings of the British war ...

    In a later biography of Haig's life, Gerard De Groot wrote: "...While Haig slept in a cosy bed in a quiet country chateau and dined on the best food available, his men lived in muddy, noisy trenches sharing their bully beef and biscuits with big, bloated rats.

  1. How important were Haig's tactics in bringing an end to WW1?

    The first part of this attack was brilliant and succeeded brilliantly. Haig took the village of Messines, which was important because its heights commanded miles of German territory, Haig's second success. The conditions for the second phase were terrible, but Haig can hardly be blamed for that.

  2. World War I in France 1916 - the Somme and Verdun.

    The more that would come to defend Verdun, the more gaps there would be along the rest of the French line. However after five months, the German had only captured 20 sq. miles and 700,000 men had been lost on both sides.

  1. Was General Haig a donkey or a great commander?

    was later to become common in the Second World War, was commendable. There are even examples, two especially, which are cited as justifying the cavalry's presence in France. In 1916 and 1918, cavalry covered the retreats of infantry, and were successful, and in the "100 days" offensive that ended the

  2. I think Haig was a bad leader who made many critical mistakes during the ...

    For example a quote from the historian Dr Sheffield says, "Reluctantly, Lloyd George gave V the go ahead for another attack, Passchendaele, perhaps the most continuous campaign in Haig's career. By the time his men went over the top, heavy rain had made the battlefield a quagmire-soldiers stuck in shell

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work