• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Source A is a piece of text written by Haig just before the battle of the Somme (July 1916 to Nov 1916), It explains that in Haig's opinion the nation has to accept the losses of warfare

Extracts from this document...


Study Sources A & B: How far does Source A prove that Haig did not care about the lives of his men? Source A is a piece of text written by Haig just before the battle of the Somme (July 1916 to Nov 1916), It explains that in Haig's opinion the nation has to accept the losses of warfare. He believes that however well an army is trained and led they will have to bear sacrifices. This is true but not to the extent of the Somme where the allies alone lost a massive 620,000 men. Haig wrote this extract a month before the first attack suggesting that he knew there was going to be a large amount casualties. This also implies that he hadn't made much of an effort to change the tactics and save the lives of men but lazily chose to prepare the nation of heavy losses. In this extract, a stubborn side of Haig has been unleashed with his mind concentrating only on the victory of the battle, no matter what the costs. For example Haig states " a nation must be taught to bear losses" and "no of skill will enable amount of victories to be won, without the sacrifice of men's lives" giving us the impression that his determination for victory would stop at nothing. ...read more.


about Field Marshall Haig and his drinks cabinet. I think a historian studying Haig and the Somme would find Sources D and E of considerable use. They both show popular ideas of Haig, one at the time of the event and the other 60 years later. As a television series, Source D would present views that the majority of the people agree with in order to boost it's ratings. This suggests that the majority of people agree that Haig was a poor leader. The series 'Blackadder goes Forth' shows both side of war; life in the frontline trenches and then in the General's headquarters. This will give a historian an insight to the conditions of the trenches and that of the headquarters. However, Source D was made 60 years after the war so the director must have made it using sources such as E and other possibly accounts. Source E also shows how men were kitted out and how poorly training would have prepared them for the reality of the war they were about to fight. This is useful as it shows how much thought they gave to the training and equipping of his troops. I think both sources are relevant to a historian studying Haig as they show the view shared by many people, which is always important. ...read more.


Study all the Sources. "Haig was an uncaring General who sacrificed the lives of his soldiers for no good reason" How far do this sources support this views. I believe that these sources do not go far to support this view. This is based on the following: - Sources A and B written by Haig himself, perhaps shows his deficiencies as a modern day leader not necessarily an uncaring butcher. Source C written by written by a private in the army, whilst giving a realistic picture from the trenches could not possible see the overall strategy. Sources D & E whilst relevant in promoting the populist view, again are biased. Sources F, a recently written book, again follows the more popular view and is a better titles to sell books. Sources G is probably the most unbiased view given that it was written by the enemy with little to gain. This source perhaps gives the biggest insight into Haig's strategy. Source H again does not support the view of the question, and was the only sources written by a fellow general who has been trained in warfare. Sources I and J both written by Lloyd George, highlights the difficulty in coming to any conclusion. He contradicts himself and argues convincingly for and against, proving that the question, even with the benefit of hindsight, is a difficult one to answer. Alex Wahnon 4M-4/3 14/11/2004 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. General Haig - Butcher or Hero?

    It would be no surprise that Spanish Influenza hit epidemic height in 1918; with nearly 500,000 civilian lives taken. It hit especially badly on the German side of the trenches, and at one point there were more Germans soldiers being killed by Spanish Influenza than by the allies!

  2. Haig and 'The Battle of the Somme' - source related study.

    However, the may not be considered by historians as it is generally the case that generals were away from the battle in order to make military decisions, and I feel that the public may have criticised Haig very harshly for doing this.

  1. Free essay

    Explain why General Haig fought the Battle of the Somme in 1916

    The original plan had called for a simultaneous attack by British, French and Russian troops, taking advantage of their two-front status. However, after the failure of the "Eastern Strategy", due to the costly defeat at Gallipoli in 1915, the only option was the Western Front.

  2. Source 1 suggest life in the trenches were great, however source 2 and 3 ...

    I think they made the soldiers look happy either to reassure the soldiers' wives that their husbands were okay, or just to promote Golden Dawn cigarettes. It doesn't mention anything about a soldier's lifestyle and how they coped with things like the decaying smell of bodies.

  1. Field Marshall Haig: 'The Butcher of the Somme?'

    The source I, an extract written to Haig from Lloyd George on the 21st September 1916, at the beginning of the Battle of Somme, describes that George is most pleased with the goings on at the Somme. George writes 'I congratulate you most warmly on the skill with which your plans were laid'.

  2. I think Haig was a bad leader who made many critical mistakes during the ...

    The source tells of the terrible conditions and the tactics that meant many were lost and advances were nearly impossible. For example Gough records "when it came to an infantry attack across the waterlogged shell-holes, movement was so slow and tiring that only the shortest advance could be considered."

  1. How important were Haig's tactics in bringing an end to WW1?

    I also think that if the Somme had not occurred then the Allies would not have won the war. This is because the Allies would not have gained the experienced needed to fight and beat the Germans at Verdun, because the Germans would have taken Verdun if it were not

  2. Some people have the view that British generals like Haig were incompetent leaders. How ...

    that the soldiers were unprepared the soldiers were for the disaster that was going to happen and how much they underestimated the German army. Perhaps these soldiers are the inexperienced ones; a lot of soldiers at the time were inexperienced due to conscription and propaganda; people just wanted to fight for their country.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work