• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

" Stalin was an evil dictator whose rule did nothing to improve Russia".

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

" Stalin was an evil dictator whose rule did nothing to improve Russia" Joseph Stalin was a dictator of Russia, his plan was to revolutionise the country. During his reign he achieved his goal but at the cost of millions of lives. He imprisoned millions of his citizen, army and members of the communist party. Before stalin came to power, Russia had many problems. Low level of industry No Education Low food supply Water & sewage control Roads and railway So when stalin came to power he felt the country needed revolution or they would be left behind. Stalin was needed to revolutionise Russia but he ill-treated his power to become leader and exploited many people on his way there. Using the sources provided I have to reach a conclusion to find out whether " Stalin was an evil dictator whose rule did nothing to improve Russia" and if this statement is correct Source 'A' is a image of Joseph Stalin. The cartoonist has a negative opinion of Stalin; David Lowe thinks that Stalin is an dreadful leader as citizens of Russia have not got the independence of speech. The image shows Stalin attempting to perform suicide, as he was talking in his sleep. ...read more.

Middle

for betraying the state. The image was intended to show the world how the real Russian lived and how they had been treated under the rule of Stalin. The picture shows what a real Russian village looked like. The image was taken in a village, where Stalin's government probably took over the local farms (collectivisation). The picture was produced during Stalin's rule over the country and most likely to have been taken in the 1930s when the nation suffered from famine. The image is a privately taken photograph, so it is likely that it isn't a propaganda picture as it shows Russian children suffering. I feel that it is more reliable than source 'd' as it not taken by the Russian information agency. This source is also a primary source, which makes it even more reliable. Source 'f' shows that in Russia they had no regard for human life. It gives a reference to a human corpse left at the work site of the lock at Belomorsk. A prisoner sent to the Gulags witnessed this corpse being shovelled into a concrete mixer. The piece of text was a eye witness account and was published to share his experience with the rest of the world. ...read more.

Conclusion

He just took away citizen owned farms and made them government property (collectivisation) using power. Also he sent many loyal citizens away to gulags. However he also improved the country by building rail tracks and better transport. Also his citizens enjoyed free water supply; electricity and near to nothing rent. Further more he provided free health care and education. To conclude, I feel that Stalin improved Russia but at a great cost and disregard for human life. Throughout his regime the countries economy grew vastly and standard of life. I feel that because of his vision of the revolution, it makes Russia the world power it is today. Also I feel that he could have had more regard for the citizens whilst revolutionising the nation. His 5-year plans improved the country and in many ways made it what it is today (production of coal, steel, electricity, oil etc). Having said that weakened the country and nearly cost the nation a war. So in conclusion I have to say that Stalin was a evil dictator but without him Russia would not be a industrialised country. Therefore I do not fully agree with the statement " Stalin was an evil dictator whose rule did nothing to improve Russia". ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. 'The Five Year Plans brought glory to Stalin and misery to his people.' How ...

    The government didn't really care about the health of the people; instead, they just made them work all the time. One department where Stalin failed was customer industry. The customer industry didn't match the standards of heavy industry. Under the first Five Year Plan textile production declined, the main reason

  2. How did Stalin control Russia from 1924-1953?

    In order to industrialise Russia, Stalin had to provide the towns and workers with food. He thought this was vital, because the population of the industrial centres was growing rapidly.

  1. Assessment on whether Stalin was a necessary evil.

    The Red Army also underwent a complete purge including the Chief of Staff Tuckachevsky and all but two army commanders. Accused of plotting to allow a German invasion half of the entire officer corps was executed and by 1939 it had seriously affected the army's ability to function, as seen with the German invasion in 1941.

  2. These three sources do not all give the same impression of Stalin. Source A ...

    Khrushchev uses words such as "distrustful ", and "suspicious" to describe Stalin. Khrushchev needed to win over the Russian people and to show them that he is not like Stalin. He pointed out Stalin's faults to show the people he's not like that.

  1. Assess the Impact Stalin Had On Russia and Its People Stalin came to ...

    Between 1922 and 1935, the number of industrial workers doubled. Therefore, helping the industrialisation plans that Stalin had for Russia. Another success of collectivisation was that the Russian farmers were no longer capitalist. Collective farms brought advantages such as schools, hospitals, nurseries for children on collectives.

  2. Stalin Man or Monster

    Whether this information is true is unknown, but Stalin managed to convince the people of Russia that it is and that he is a man who cares about each and human being. The source shows some of Stalin's characteristics of being manipulative and a liar.

  1. Stalin man or monster

    Thus it can be concluded that all three sources show conflicting stories and thus all three can be seen to be untrustworthy and biased. 2) Study source D. Does this source provide any useful evidence about Stalin? Explain your answer.

  2. 'The Five Year Plans brought glory to Stalin and misery to his people' - ...

    Is there any way in which life improved? 20 marks Stalin's extreme scheme of modernisation of the USSR were for the purpose of making the USSR compete with the Capitalist Western countries. The first Five Year Plans still lead to staggering achievements even though it couldn't quite meet all its targets set.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work