• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

" Stalin was an evil dictator whose rule did nothing to improve Russia".

Extracts from this document...


" Stalin was an evil dictator whose rule did nothing to improve Russia" Joseph Stalin was a dictator of Russia, his plan was to revolutionise the country. During his reign he achieved his goal but at the cost of millions of lives. He imprisoned millions of his citizen, army and members of the communist party. Before stalin came to power, Russia had many problems. Low level of industry No Education Low food supply Water & sewage control Roads and railway So when stalin came to power he felt the country needed revolution or they would be left behind. Stalin was needed to revolutionise Russia but he ill-treated his power to become leader and exploited many people on his way there. Using the sources provided I have to reach a conclusion to find out whether " Stalin was an evil dictator whose rule did nothing to improve Russia" and if this statement is correct Source 'A' is a image of Joseph Stalin. The cartoonist has a negative opinion of Stalin; David Lowe thinks that Stalin is an dreadful leader as citizens of Russia have not got the independence of speech. The image shows Stalin attempting to perform suicide, as he was talking in his sleep. ...read more.


for betraying the state. The image was intended to show the world how the real Russian lived and how they had been treated under the rule of Stalin. The picture shows what a real Russian village looked like. The image was taken in a village, where Stalin's government probably took over the local farms (collectivisation). The picture was produced during Stalin's rule over the country and most likely to have been taken in the 1930s when the nation suffered from famine. The image is a privately taken photograph, so it is likely that it isn't a propaganda picture as it shows Russian children suffering. I feel that it is more reliable than source 'd' as it not taken by the Russian information agency. This source is also a primary source, which makes it even more reliable. Source 'f' shows that in Russia they had no regard for human life. It gives a reference to a human corpse left at the work site of the lock at Belomorsk. A prisoner sent to the Gulags witnessed this corpse being shovelled into a concrete mixer. The piece of text was a eye witness account and was published to share his experience with the rest of the world. ...read more.


He just took away citizen owned farms and made them government property (collectivisation) using power. Also he sent many loyal citizens away to gulags. However he also improved the country by building rail tracks and better transport. Also his citizens enjoyed free water supply; electricity and near to nothing rent. Further more he provided free health care and education. To conclude, I feel that Stalin improved Russia but at a great cost and disregard for human life. Throughout his regime the countries economy grew vastly and standard of life. I feel that because of his vision of the revolution, it makes Russia the world power it is today. Also I feel that he could have had more regard for the citizens whilst revolutionising the nation. His 5-year plans improved the country and in many ways made it what it is today (production of coal, steel, electricity, oil etc). Having said that weakened the country and nearly cost the nation a war. So in conclusion I have to say that Stalin was a evil dictator but without him Russia would not be a industrialised country. Therefore I do not fully agree with the statement " Stalin was an evil dictator whose rule did nothing to improve Russia". ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. China 1945-90 - source based questions.

    The Gang of Four was no friends of Zhou, and Zhou attempted to make the succession clearer by reinstating Deng Xiaoping to high office, including Chief-of-Staff of the military. The Gang of Four tried a number of poster campaigns to criticise the new direction of Zhou and Deng.

  2. 'The Five Year Plans brought glory to Stalin and misery to his people.' How ...

    Some of the worst labour camps were in the Kolyma region in the Northeast. During the consistent -60 C and continuous polar nights kept the Kolyma in darkness in the winter. The labour camps were responsible for a large proportion of the Russian workforce, they were forced, faced physical punishment

  1. Stalin: Man Or Monster?

    He certainly seems to passionately believe it. Source K is a similar source, which, again, may people would just call propaganda but there may be some truth in it. Stalin certainly seemed devoted to the party's ideals and did a lot of things that he judged were best 'for the people'.

  2. How did Stalin control Russia from 1924-1953?

    The unpredictability that lead to so many people fearing him. This stopped people opposing him, and by removing senior party members he was getting rid of any rivals that may threaten his region as Russian leader. In a way, it also gained him a little trust, as he was shown

  1. These three sources do not all give the same impression of Stalin. Source A ...

    He was very different from Stalin. He talked of peaceful co-existence with the West. He made plans to reduce expenditure on arms. He also said he wanted to improve the living standards of ordinary Soviet citizens and those of eastern Europe.

  2. Source A comes from a cartoon published in Paris in the 1930s. It shows ...

    This is more reliable, as he worked closely with Stalin, so he would know what he was like. Source E is a view of a Russian who has only seen Stalin's good side. He did not express any bad points in his speech, either through fear or complete ignorance of who Stalin really was.

  1. Stalin Man or Monster

    The death of millions is a statistic." Here Stalin claims that a death of one man would matter very much and would be a great tragedy. When judging Stalin's character this source is useful as it shows him as a manipulative person.

  2. Stalin man or monster

    A painting reliant on an artistic invention Influenced by harsh censorship governed by Stalin where he would've not welcomed an unflattering critical picture the artist would have been punished. Propaganda was needed to increase support of Communism as an ideology to show that it was better the capitalism heroic Russian

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work