• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Study Sources A and B. How far do these two accounts agree about Prohibition?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Question A. Study Sources A and B. How far do these two accounts agree about Prohibition? This question is instructing me to compare sources A and B and notice how far they actually agreed about Prohibition. The Sources A and B both agree about Prohibition in some ways and disagreed about it in others. They each discuss and explain when prohibition was introduced and the consequences that it brought, both agreeing on points to a certain extent. For example they both agree that alcohol was evil, but in other ways disagree as Source B goes into more depth about the effects of prohibition by using figures such as, '30,000 speakeasies in New York.' Throughout each piece of text, the sources both agreed quite a lot and felt strongly about the same matters. This is because each of the sources state the consequences that Prohibition brought about by saying 'It created the greatest criminal boom in American history (Source A)' ...read more.

Middle

Furthermore, the two Sources also mention the Anti-Saloon league and the year 1917 (as it was an important year for the fight against alcohol). Source A talks about 1917 by saying 'twenty-three states had already introduced a ban on alcohol' and that the Anti-Saloon was good and introduced correctly as it was '...at a time when large numbers of men were absent in the armed forces.' Source B also describes 1917 as '...a nation wide campaign,' as it affected many states, and it also talks about the Anti-Saloon League by saying it '...brought pressure to bear on Congress to ban the use of grain for either distilling or brewing.' Which agrees fully with Source A as it explains, 'Among possible explanations we must include... the wartime concern for preserving grain for food.' This shows that each Source starts off by stating reasons why prohibition was introduced, and they each feel that the grain needed to be put to better use, by feeding the Americans at war. ...read more.

Conclusion

As it talks about Prohibition causing the '...greatest criminal boom in American history, and perhaps in all modern history,' and also 'No earlier law produced such widespread crime.' Also Source A differs to B as it talks differently about 1917. This is because '...twenty-three states...introduced a ban on alcohol,' whereas Source B takes about a '...nation-wide campaign...' in 1917. Therefore they each give different points about the goings on in 1917 and what prohibition influenced states and countries to do. In conclusion to this, my overall judgement would be that, although the two sources do not agree on everything there are strong similarities between the two sources and they each have a positive argument in contrast with the other. They mainly agree on the areas concerning the consequences that prohibition brought about but both disagree on the reasons why it was introduced, which shows that they have each given valid points backed up by each other and therefore agree to a far extent before they each go on to talk about the different matters of Prohibition. Michael Boland History Coursework Page 1 of 2 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE USA 1919-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE USA 1919-1941 essays

  1. Roosevelt Sources Question

    The New Deal may have helped but it wasn't the only thing. Much of the Deal had helped like the alphabet agencies, they helped because it gave people jobs and the chance to work and gain money. They certainly lifted people's hopes.

  2. American History Coursework

    workers to confront these large companies by means of labour unions in an effort to ensure higher quality conditions in which they would find it easier to work. In addition to this, the various methods of campaigning for improvements for workers in the workplace were, quite commonly, illegally policed by

  1. History - Prohibition

    The Republican policies included tariffs, low taxation and trusts. The government used propaganda and advertising to sell American goods and encouraged a new attitude, 'spend rather than save'. Those who could not afford to buy goods could still purchase them on credit, that is to say, borrow money from the banks ('buy now, pay later').

  2. How far was

    However, it was not only individuals who speculated, banks also got involved and the certainly did nothing to hold it back. In 1929 alone American banks lent $9billion for speculating. Through most of the 1920s share prices rose at a fairly steady rate, with a few downturns, but in 1928

  1. Prohibition was doomed a failure from the start - agree or disagree

    I cannot find anything on source H, which makes me doubt its reliability, so I personally think the reliability of source H is good as its portrayal of the prohibition is impartial. As source H confirms the banning of alcohol criminalised all of American society.

  2. Was Prohibition bound to fail? - source related study.

    desires to consume alcohol, which could not be quashed, into the eventual failure of Prohibition. Looking at sources J and I, who I earlier concluded did support each other in their message, it is clear that they also agree with the common viewpoint of these five sources.

  1. History depth study coursework-USA 1919-1945.

    a reason but just stated that "historians disagree" though they do suggest the same groups were the people who had the influence to enforce it. (b) The two posters were produced before Prohibition was enforced. This would mean that they were probably produced to persuade people to vote for Prohibition.

  2. Depth study USA.

    It became law in 1919. In some rural states prohibition workedm in a limited way. In supporters could not point out that there were fewer deaths from alcogolism and fever arrests for drunkenness. Hoewver, in the cities, it soon became celar that prohibition was not stopping Americans drinking.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work