• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Study Sources A and B. How far do these two accounts agree about Prohibition?

Extracts from this document...


Question A. Study Sources A and B. How far do these two accounts agree about Prohibition? This question is instructing me to compare sources A and B and notice how far they actually agreed about Prohibition. The Sources A and B both agree about Prohibition in some ways and disagreed about it in others. They each discuss and explain when prohibition was introduced and the consequences that it brought, both agreeing on points to a certain extent. For example they both agree that alcohol was evil, but in other ways disagree as Source B goes into more depth about the effects of prohibition by using figures such as, '30,000 speakeasies in New York.' Throughout each piece of text, the sources both agreed quite a lot and felt strongly about the same matters. This is because each of the sources state the consequences that Prohibition brought about by saying 'It created the greatest criminal boom in American history (Source A)' ...read more.


Furthermore, the two Sources also mention the Anti-Saloon league and the year 1917 (as it was an important year for the fight against alcohol). Source A talks about 1917 by saying 'twenty-three states had already introduced a ban on alcohol' and that the Anti-Saloon was good and introduced correctly as it was '...at a time when large numbers of men were absent in the armed forces.' Source B also describes 1917 as '...a nation wide campaign,' as it affected many states, and it also talks about the Anti-Saloon League by saying it '...brought pressure to bear on Congress to ban the use of grain for either distilling or brewing.' Which agrees fully with Source A as it explains, 'Among possible explanations we must include... the wartime concern for preserving grain for food.' This shows that each Source starts off by stating reasons why prohibition was introduced, and they each feel that the grain needed to be put to better use, by feeding the Americans at war. ...read more.


As it talks about Prohibition causing the '...greatest criminal boom in American history, and perhaps in all modern history,' and also 'No earlier law produced such widespread crime.' Also Source A differs to B as it talks differently about 1917. This is because '...twenty-three states...introduced a ban on alcohol,' whereas Source B takes about a '...nation-wide campaign...' in 1917. Therefore they each give different points about the goings on in 1917 and what prohibition influenced states and countries to do. In conclusion to this, my overall judgement would be that, although the two sources do not agree on everything there are strong similarities between the two sources and they each have a positive argument in contrast with the other. They mainly agree on the areas concerning the consequences that prohibition brought about but both disagree on the reasons why it was introduced, which shows that they have each given valid points backed up by each other and therefore agree to a far extent before they each go on to talk about the different matters of Prohibition. Michael Boland History Coursework Page 1 of 2 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE USA 1919-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE USA 1919-1941 essays

  1. How far was

    Wiser investors such as Roger Babson realised, in September 1929 the boom just could not last and that there would soon be a crash or huge fall in share prices. The Dow Jones index then dropped by a serious 10 points.

  2. Study sources A and B - How far do these sources agree about prohibition?

    The quote shows that the war played an important role in the introduction of prohibition. The Germans were also hated as a result of the war, which adds greater weight to this statement. Source B lists the groups that were campaigning for the introduction of prohibition.

  1. Prohibition - source related study.

    So unless they didn't bribe the officials they would not be arrested/shut down.... As a result of this backhander, prohibition became a failure, because the enforcers weren't doing their job.

  2. GCSE History Coursework

    The children are shown as poor and wearing old ragged up clothes. The caption 'Daddy's in there' is to show the innocence of the children and to gain sympathy for them and hatred for the dad who has abandoned his children and keeps drinking alcohol.

  1. Prohibition Sources Coursework.

    However the families need the money for food and clothing, but the men spend it in the saloon so the family has to go without. The more they drink, the more they want and the more money they spend. At the bottom of the poster it says, "slaves of the saloon", meaning the men are unable to break the habit.

  2. How far do these two accounts agree about prohibition?

    This is symbolic to the membership fees he would pay if it were a proper club. This source is against alcohol and for prohibition because it is portraying alcohol as a cause for poverty and addiction and condoning the men that submit to it.

  1. Why was prohibition introduced

    on the margin", this was a loan to buy stocks .The middle classes saw this as a "get rich quick" scheme and started buying up any stocks they could in the hope of making money. All sections of society enjoyed success and were not afraid to display their wealth.

  2. Prohibition Sources Coursework

    by the abuse of alcohol and no more premature deaths as a result of drinking. The principle idea of prohibition was that as violence within families was due to alcohol decreases, fathers would be better providers and so more productive at work.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work