How far do these two accounts agree about prohibition?

Authors Avatar

Study sources A and B.

How far do these two accounts agree about prohibition?

The two sources of information about prohibition (Sources A and B) both discuss first the reasons for prohibition and secondly the consequences.

From the information given there is some agreement about the reasons for prohibition. It cannot be said that there is total agreement because source A record, some reasons that are not mentioned in Source B, but all the reasons that are recorded in Source B are contained in Source A.  Therefore there is some agreement but not total agreement.

The points that Source A and Source B agree about the reasons for prohibition are: -

In 1917 there was a nationwide campaign led by anti saloon league brought pressure on congress to ban use of grain for brewing and distilling of alcohol.

Join now!

One of the other reasons was the moral fervour that was inspired by the ‘war to make the world safe for democracy’.

The points that Source A mentions only are: -

 

Source A says that one of the worst influences on the people at the time was the saloons, while Source B disagrees with this and says that it was the peoples own fault for the banning of alcohol. Source A says that this was on e of the main reasons for the banning of alcohol were saloons, while Source B says that the Women’s Christian ...

This is a preview of the whole essay