• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The American West :General George Armstrong Custer 1839 – 1878

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

G.C.S.E. COURSEWORK THE AMERICAN WEST: General George Armstrong Custer 1839 - 1878 by Thomas Parr General George Armstrong Custer 1) From 'Source A' I can see that Custer is a powerful soldier, due to his uniform and the weapon he is resting on. His uniform also shows that he is a high rank. His long hair shows that he is a bit of a rebel, as short hair is usually the norm. It also shows he is proud and different, and I feel shows arrogance. His pose shows confidence. His face is stern and emotionless, which I feel shows that he is in control, and very focused. In 'Source E' Custer is the only one wearing buckskin, so it shows his individuality, and possibly arrogance again - he had to be different. He is also with an Indian, so it shows he liked some of them. The fact that he has killed a grizzly bear shows that he is strong and brave- a good hunter. 2) Custer came from a poor background, but he was still incredibly ambitious and he wanted to be a lawyer. He needed a free education so went to West Point. He did not want to be a soldier and finished bottom of the class, maybe showing signs of laziness, complacency or just a lack of intelligence. He was lucky twice. First of all in 1861- the American Civil War, so it did not matter that he was bottom of the class, he became a soldier anyway. ...read more.

Middle

They think that he is a brave soldier, for whom his men have the utmost respect his skill and ability, and is a man who would give his life for the sake of his country. It is not useful however, for the truth. We know not all of his men loved and admired him, "He was too hard on his men and horses" (Source K), "Aloof and removed" (Source H), "Possible loss of life were worthy of but little considerations" (Source F). Source J is useful because it gives you the point of view of the Indians, of the enemy. It tells us that the Indians had a lot of respect for Custer, "He was a brave warrior", but the Source is not actually that useful. It does not give us much information, as we already knew he was a brave warrior. I think that Source K is the most useful source by far. This is because it tells us a lot of information about him, and is backed up by other Sources. It tells us that he did not care about his men, "He was too hard on his men". At the Battle of Little Big Horn, Custer attacked the Indians even though his men were exhausted. "He was always right", this maybe shows he was arrogant and big headed, thinking that he could win every battle, and is backed up other Sources. "He never conferred" for example with Reno and Bentine prior to the Battle of Little Big Horn. ...read more.

Conclusion

He then promised to back up Reno, but decided to attack from the North instead, leaving Reno and his men confused and not knowing what to do. By that time (mid afternoon, extremely hot and dusty) Custer had lost the element of surprise, and so the Indians were prepared for his attack. Custer also expected the Indians to scatter as they had always had done in the past, but they attacked back. But Custer's downfall was not brought upon him solely by himself, as there were other aspects beyond his knowledge or control. His men were armed with Springfield rifles, where as the Indians had superior Winchesters, which could fire far more quickly. Sitting Bull had a vision that Custer would be defeated. This was a huge moral boost for the Indians, who believed they would win. They were fired up for the battle, and many Indians were out for revenge. Some of Custer's less experienced men ran, "their knees hit their chins", some committed suicide, and others surrendered, further weakening his attack. Custer retreated to high ground, only to be outsmarted and outflanked by Crazy Horse, who had come round the back of Custer. Custer was surrounded and crushed, "Our horses hooves would have been enough". It was Custer's last chance for the fame and glory he craved. He ignored all the warnings in his singled minded attempts to wipe out the Indians. The Indians used superior tactics, and outflanked him. He was pumped up, and over-confident. Rather than call him foolish, I would say he was arrogant. Custer Being Shot By Th:)mas Parr 1:)E ?? ?? ?? ?? 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE History Projects section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE History Projects essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    To what extent was Custer to blame for the defeat at the battle of ...

    3 star(s)

    At one point of his military career, Custer abandoned his men because he went home to his wife to check if she had caught cholera. He also mistreated his men. He did this when some of his men decided to runaway. They were found by Custer and they were injured.

  2. 'Law and Order in the American West'

    living on the cattle's body known as Texas fever, which homesteaders feared, would be passed onto their animals. A solution to this dilemma was pioneered by Charles Goodnight (1836 - 1929) who secured his prosperous position in the cattle industry by selling beef to feed Native American Indians living on

  1. Free essay

    Custers responsibilty for teh defeat at Little Bighorn

    Then maybe he would have accepted the extra men and Gatling guns and have a better chance of defeating them. But the scouts did inform him that there were too many Indians to take on before the actual battle, but he still decided to risk it.

  2. HIstory American West

    In 1866 the first train robbery took place outside Seymour, Indiana. And by 1890's it was a common crime on all the major railroads. The main problems that caused this crime was that the doors were too weak and could be broken into easily.

  1. To What Extent is it right to call the Plains Indians Savages?

    without a weapon, to meet a war-party bristling with arms, and trespassing to the middle of their country. They had every reason to look upon us as their natural enemy, and yet, instead of arms... or even of frowns, they galloped out and looked us in our faces...

  2. Who was the real Custer, and to what extent was he to blame for ...

    us to argue that many aspects of the battle were his fault. If this is a true analogy, he would have ignored orders and done anything for as much glory as possible. But with these down sides, came incredible ambition, as he had always wanted to become a lawyer, causing him to also be bold and brave.

  1. An analysis of American History 1865-1920

    Reconstruction did bring about the 14th and 15th amendments giving a solid grounding for blacks in the North. Wise 5 These amendments however did not properly affect blacks in the South for another hundred years. This was a time when the title "President" mattered very little.

  2. Of Mice and Men

    He also suggested to Candy that "S'pose they was a carnival or a circus come to town, or a ball game, or any damn thing...We'd just go to her." This indicates that George yearned after the American Dream, wishing to be free and self-reliant, able to go anywhere he'd like at anytime.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work