• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Battle of the Little Bighorn.

Extracts from this document...


The Battle of the Little Bighorn In 1861 the US government introduced the reservation solution. Plains Indians were to be moved to designated areas known as reservations. There they would receive payments from the government and be taught the ways of the white men. However the Indians who refused to surrender their lives and the Grace land that they and their brothers had lived upon, long before the white men's unexpected arrival, soon disrupted this plan. The breaking of the treaty, which prevented white settlers to settle upon their land, and also them passing through it, angered Red Cloud. There were many Sioux attacks on travellers. These attacks went on for many years, until 1866. The US army ignored their accusations and set up forts along the reservation, to prevent further attacks. Red Cloud in disgust attacked the army. The forts, which had been built upon the Bozeman trail, were soon under siege. The Sioux alone were not strong enough to capture the forts, which were equipped with weaponry the Plains Indians had rarely see before, Rifles. Red Cloud kept a force of several Sioux Bands and had also allied with the Arapaho and the Cheyenne. The incentive, of their livelihoods spurred them on. They fort for many months. Red Cloud also had the vision to try and persuade the Crow, traditional enemies of the Sioux, to fight with his people. Although this did not happen, Red Cloud and his people fought on. ...read more.


A life that, would not see another battle, or another day. Custer had not used his Scouts well; he had barely used them at all. He had Indian Scouts from the enemy tribe of the Sioux, who could of told him a great deal about the strength of the Indian Camp he was preparing to attack, about the firepower of the Indians and the terrain that surrounded the camp. Custer sidelined the scouts, he was the man that ran the show, he knew everything, and he was the noble and brave war veteran. Well, at least this is what he had thought, and if truth were told, so did his men. They had not lost under Custer; he was a respected and experienced Indian fighter. He had never needed scouts before, why was this battle going to be any different? He needed Scouts, especially ones who could blend in, and this would be different. Little did George Armstrong Custer know that the Indian camp he was about to attack with only his battalion was three times his strength, containing not only Sioux, but also Cheyenne warriors. Custer' s plan was put into action: Reno's squadron of 175 soldiers attacked the northern end of the camp. Quickly finding themselves in a desperate battle with little hope of surviving, Reno halted his charging men before they could be trapped and killed, they fought for ten minutes in un-orderly state, hoping that it wasn't going to be their scalps upon the mass of tee-pees they saw before them. ...read more.


But Custer' eyes were clouded with greed, he needed no scouts. Custer definitely went down in history. He went down as the General who led his men into worst military disaster in American History. What happened to the Sioux after the battle? Although the Indians won the Battle of the Little Bighorn, it was not a major event in Sioux history. Knowing that there would be severe punishment for their victory, the Indians immediately split up and traveled on so that the U.S. Cavalry would have a difficult time trying to find them. Eventually, they would be forced to live on reservations as their land went into the hands of the U.S. government for mining and farming. Something the Indians did not do or intend on doing. They had fought hard in a losing battle. They had success in the Battle of the Little Bighorn, but had lost their way of life. Their victory attracted even more discrimination and racism and gave the white men an extra incentive to wipe out the Plains Indians altogether. They would now be forced to live as the white men, be taught to farm crops and live in captivity. Some Indians killed themselves rather than live a false life with their humiliated and half annihilated brothers. So the Battle of the Little Bighorn was not really a victory for the Indians. They had fought with their lives, and what had they won, a life of shame, cruelty and eventually death. The reward for their victory was nothing. They had fought with their lives, only to lose their way of life. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE History Projects section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE History Projects essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    To what extent was Custer to blame for the defeat at the battle of ...

    3 star(s)

    He was to protect travellers and miners from the Indians. Custer then rose to the rank of Lieutenant-Colonel. As time went on he gained recognition from the plenty successful attacks on Indian camps. Custer was now a successful, brave, heroic fighter that was invincible.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    To what extent was Custer to blame for the defeat of the 7th Cavalry ...

    3 star(s)

    days battle Benteen's now united force escaped when the Indians broke off the fight, they had learned that two other columns of soldiers were coming towards them, so they fled. They received order to support Custer but were unable to because they were under such heavy attack.

  1. Was Custer to blame for the defeat at the Battle of Little Bighorn

    Differently, there are some historians that believe it not to be the US army that failed, but the Sioux and their allies that had changed their battle tactics enough to have beaten them.

  2. Who was the real Custer, and to what extent was he to blame for ...

    General Sheridan in a note to Custer's wife Elizabeth." It favours the side of Custer shown from the great amount of praise. And can act as a negative factor to why it was not Custer's fault because it suggests that he was a good fighter and if so would have

  1. The Battle of the Little Bighorn.

    His graduating place was determined by his personality. Custer did not like taking orders from anyone. He hated being told what to do, and therefore refused to work hard as a result of this. This personality trait is evident from his appalling record from the Military Academy.

  2. How Were The Roman Army Superior In Weaponry, Armour And Tactics To The Celts?

    train together professionally and had a comparatively large army with a wide range of weapons and armour to protect them. In conclusion I have looked at both armies and highlighted their tactics, weaponry and armour. The Celtic tactics were to scare and terrify the Romans before fighting them and this

  1. Am I not a Man and a brother?

    One day I saw my dear little Sam spilt the water, the fear nearly made me faint. Then with my own eyes, I watched the whip cut into Sam's bones. Samuel saw me as well; he cried with pain at once and ran to me with his unsteady, babyish walk, tripping and falling all the time.

  2. General George Custer

    I believe these are some of the reasons for the battle of The Little Big Horn. The plan of attack was to take the Indians from different angle. General's Terry and Gibbon would lead their troops along the little big horn and approach the Indians from the north.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work