• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The events that occurred in Derry on January 30th 1972 became known as Bloody Sunday. Why have these events produced such different historical interpretations?

Extracts from this document...


Lauren Baker 11B4 History Coursework Page 1 The events that occurred in Derry on January 30th 1972 became known as Bloody Sunday. Why have these events produced such different historical interpretations? The straightforward answer is because at present historians do not know precisely what happened on Bloody Sunday. The basic facts are clear. These are that on 30 January NICRA (Northern Ireland Civil Rights Association) planned to hold a civil rights march in Londonderry to protest against Internment (the imprisonment of suspected terrorists without a trial.) British troops opened fire, killing thirteen people and wounding several more. However there are many different interpretations of who started the violence and who was to blame for the events of Bloody Sunday. The Northern Ireland government had banned all such marches, the year before, but the marchers were determined to go ahead anyway. Besides, few Catholics took much notice any longer of the Northern Ireland government. The marchers were unarmed, but when they reached barricades that had been put up by the army to stop them leaving the Bog side, they began to throw stones and shout insults at the soldiers. ...read more.


They viewed themselves as 'carrying out their duties as a peacekeeping force', and blame the IRA terrorists, who had already carried out many attacks on the Ulster Constabulary and British Army in Northern Ireland. Nationalists, especially Sinn Fein and the IRA, regarded the British Army as an Army of 'occupation'. In their view, the British Army's presence in Ireland was itself an act of aggression so in their eyes the Nationalist community had every right to protest against it. Their interpretation of Bloody Sunday is that the soldiers' response to the marchers was the act of an aggressive invasion force trying to put down legal protest against an illegal occupation of Ireland. It reflects their view that Republicans were not simply terrorists, but occupied in a justifiable armed struggle against British aggression. In the Widgery report the government claimed, " Each soldier was his own judge of whether he had identified a gunman." A Catholic priest at the scene claimed that he saw no one shooting at troops. He claimed that he saw the British Army shoot without selecting targets, "it was a massacre." Due to his religious tendency one would expect him not to make up such a statement, however someone writing a report concluding ...read more.


When two groups oppose each other, interpretations are bound to differ, however another cause for the difference in interpretation is that because Bloody Sunday happened 31 years ago, all the buildings are different now and the place itself cannot be used as evidence to support either side's statements. Source I is therefore an example of a valid piece of evidence as it shows a reconstruction of Derry's bog side and can portray the bog side as it was, which is needed to support peoples accounts. Interpretations may differ because people hear, see and experience things differently and so for example a gun being fired by a soldier could have triggered other soldiers to open fire if they had cause to believe it was a civilian or member of the IRA. Currently, the only people who know the truth are those who carried and used weapons on that terrible day and their commanders, both British Army officers, possibly acting on the orders of the British government, or the IRA leadership. This is why the "Saville Inquiry" has been set up by the British government as part of the current peace process to try to find out the truth behind Bloody Sunday. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Northern Ireland 1965-85 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Northern Ireland 1965-85 essays

  1. Northern Ireland - Bloody Sunday.

    In 1985 the Anglo-Irish Agreement tried to involve Southern Ireland in tackling the problem, however, this also dissatisfied the Protestants - they saw no reason why the South should get involved. In 1993 the Downing Street agreement was made and London and Dublin started to work closer together.

  2. How realistic is a United Ireland in the context of past and present events? ...

    The British government then seized their lands. Some of the poorest land was returned to the Irish, while the town of Derry was given to the City of London. The city is known as Londonderry but the Catholics have always seen this city as Derry. The policy of settling foreigners in Ireland was not entirely new.

  1. What Happened at Sharpeville on 21st March 1960?Massacre or Self-Defence?

    This corresponds to Source B when it says, "Police reinforcements were sent" to control the crowds. The photograph from Source D also shows similarities between both of the previous textual Sources.

  2. Which of these two sources would a historian studying 'Bloody Sunday' find the more ...

    However, when it was discovered that they were not going to win quite so easily, the opposite happened and the people mistrusted the tsar. This, added to the problems that already existed with discontented factory workers, contributed to the annoyance of the workers when they marched on 'Bloody Sunday'.

  1. The build up to Bloody Sunday, and why it happened.

    How it shaped the views of the /Loyalists/Unionists/Protestants and the Republicans/Nationalists/Catholics The prevailing view across the two communities is that the much more thorough Saville Tribunal is throwing new and disturbing light on the behaviour of the Parachute Regiment in Derry that day.

  2. Bloody Sunday - Why interpretations differ.

    There are reasons that the army would say this. The government could not show the British army to be killers, which would be bad publicity for Britain. There are other reasons why the army have upheld their story for so long.

  1. What happened on Bloody Sunday?

    Many people called for a United Nations role. Nationalists became even more suspicious of the British government's role in Ireland. One of the most significant consequences is that many young Catholics swelled the ranks of the IRA. In the 3 years prior to Bloody Sunday 210 were killed in troubles.

  2. “Why has it proved so difficult to reach agreement about what happened on Bloody ...

    Prime Minister Ted Heath sent a memo to Lord Widgery, chief of the investigation, which read 'It has to be remembered that in Northern Ireland we are not only fighting a military war, but a propaganda war.' . This can be seen as a statement typical of the Widgery report.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work