• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"The Governments of both late Tsarist Russia and early Communist Soviet Union were essentially dictatorships with similar aims on controlling the population." How far do you agree with this judgment when examining Russia, 1855 - 1953?

Extracts from this document...


"The Governments of both late Tsarist Russia and early Communist Soviet Union were essentially dictatorships with similar aims on controlling the population." How far do you agree with this judgment when examining Russia, 1855 - 1953? The statement describes the natures of the two regimes reasonably accurately when it states that they were both "essentially dictatorships." However, in order for this to be the case, a slightly different definition of a dictatorship is required for each case. The second part of the quote is less accurate. Although both used specific devices to keep the population under tight control, their views on why and how the population should be controlled differed. The Communist regime was based on Marxist theory. It sought to overthrow capitalism through a workers' revolution and establish a system whereby the community owned all property. In this way, the Soviets hoped to create a classless society of equal economic status. For this to occur, a strong leader, such as Lenin, was necessary. The opposition from the Bourgeoisie had to be crushed throughout Lenin's rule, and when initially establishing power. Marxist theory suggested that workers in Russia had more in common with the same class of people in another country than the Russian aristocracy or elite. ...read more.


The Legal System was overseen by the senate, and was made up of the highest members of this aristocracy. However, all who served on these bodies were appointed by the Tsar, and therefore could be 'relieved of their duties' should the Tsar wish. Therefore, it could be questioned whether Tsarist Russia was a dictatorship, since the Provincial Governors and local officials actually had a lot of freedom due to the size of Russia and the difficulty of communication. However, the fact that the Tsar was responsible for all these Governors and officials directly mean Tsarist rule was essentially a dictatorship. The huge number of revolts faced by the Tsar were all dealt with in a similar way. Rather than having a divine right to rule, Lenin effectively created a dictatorship within the party, enabling him to rule Russia using dictatorial devices, although he can't actually be termed a dictator. The Cabinet became the Sovnarkom and Ministers became People's Commissars. Lenin believed only Bolsheviks could build the new world - so refused to invite other socialists into his government. He saw "political terror" as an inevitable stage in establishing the "dictatorship of the proletariat." Perhaps Lenin saw himself as a temporary dictator on the road to this ultimate goal. ...read more.


Between 1883 - 1903, there were 1500 revolts. Since there were only a few thousand law enforcement officers apart from the secret police, the army played a major part in maintaining law and order. The very fact that the army was central to the Tsar ruling Russia was quite dictatorial, in a similar way to the Cheka for the communists. The Cheka were not restricted by the law, and could execute people without trial (50000 people in 1918). At some point under communist rule, the Cheka, OGPU, NKVD and KGB were used to control the population. In conclusion, the initial statement is accurate. However, the Tsar's aims on controlling the population were motivated by his desire for the people to accept his divine right to rule and appreciate he was their autocratic ruler, whereas the Communists were simply forcing the population to remain submissive and accept what was happening to Russia even if they didn't like it. Similarly, it could be argued whether or not either regime was dictatorial. The Tsar was as much a dictator as any autocratic ruler. Theoretically, every later Tsar had to appease both the Reformists and the Traditionalists. However, the Westernisers desire for a constitution was never possible as it contradicted the Tsar's core beliefs. It could be argued that the Communist regime was more of a dictatorship than the Tsarist regime, both as a party ruling Russia and Lenin and Stalin as figures within the party. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. How did the rule of Stalin affect the Soviet Union?

    * 1500 huge power stations, factories and metal working complexes were built. * Factories, which made tractors, were set up in Stalingrad. * The Trans-Siberia railway was a single track, it was doubled and new railways were laid. * Oil out put at the Causcaus wells increased greatly.

  2. How effectively did the Soviet Union control Eastern Europe from 1945 to 1968?

    Germany had been one of many significant factors in the Cold War, and a collapse in Germany would mean a collapse in Soviet power if the West were to reclaim it. This might have been a short term cause for the Warsaw Pact in 1955 - the Soviet's version of

  1. How Successful Were Stalin's Policies During His Leadership of the Soviet Union?

    This is because he eliminated many of the military officers during the purges, rejected the massive information warning of the German attack in June 1941 and did nothing to bolster borders. Moreover his prohibition of strategic withdrawal in the summer of 1941 led to the capture of hundreds of thousands of Red Army men.

  2. Why did the Tsarist regime fall in 1917?

    social situation, and to encourage people to not just sit there and put up with it, but to do something about it. Source G also tried to create discontent with the Tsarist regime, as it showed a dirty tramp, seemingly in control of the Tsar and Tsarina.

  1. How important was Stalin compared to Lenin in creating the Soviet Union?

    As such we can conclude that this historian thinks that Stalin instigated the Purges and show trials because of his own insecurities rather than because of genuine threats to the party or the Union. Indeed this view point is continued in John Arch-Getty's thought written in 'origins of the Great


    Another way of keeping the people in check, especially the 'dark masses' was to conscript numbers of them into the Russian armed services. Conscription was regularly used as a form of punishment. I believe this was a key way in securing the tsarist regime as it thought people what the

  1. How important was Lenin compared to Stalin in creating the Soviet Union?

    The five year plans were used very effectively for propaganda purposes. Stalin had wanted the Soviet Union to be a "beacon of socialism" and his publicity machine used the successes of industrialisation to further that objective. Overall although Lenin introduced many decrees aimed at specific areas such as pleasing the

  2. There would have been no second revolution without Lenin How far do you agree ...

    Lenin was not even in Russia till April 1917 and returned to hiding in Finland before returning only days before the second revolution, and even when he returned there were factors beyond his control that contributed to the success of the second revolution.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work