• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"The Governments of both late Tsarist Russia and early Communist Soviet Union were essentially dictatorships with similar aims on controlling the population." How far do you agree with this judgment when examining Russia, 1855 - 1953?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"The Governments of both late Tsarist Russia and early Communist Soviet Union were essentially dictatorships with similar aims on controlling the population." How far do you agree with this judgment when examining Russia, 1855 - 1953? The statement describes the natures of the two regimes reasonably accurately when it states that they were both "essentially dictatorships." However, in order for this to be the case, a slightly different definition of a dictatorship is required for each case. The second part of the quote is less accurate. Although both used specific devices to keep the population under tight control, their views on why and how the population should be controlled differed. The Communist regime was based on Marxist theory. It sought to overthrow capitalism through a workers' revolution and establish a system whereby the community owned all property. In this way, the Soviets hoped to create a classless society of equal economic status. For this to occur, a strong leader, such as Lenin, was necessary. The opposition from the Bourgeoisie had to be crushed throughout Lenin's rule, and when initially establishing power. Marxist theory suggested that workers in Russia had more in common with the same class of people in another country than the Russian aristocracy or elite. ...read more.

Middle

The Legal System was overseen by the senate, and was made up of the highest members of this aristocracy. However, all who served on these bodies were appointed by the Tsar, and therefore could be 'relieved of their duties' should the Tsar wish. Therefore, it could be questioned whether Tsarist Russia was a dictatorship, since the Provincial Governors and local officials actually had a lot of freedom due to the size of Russia and the difficulty of communication. However, the fact that the Tsar was responsible for all these Governors and officials directly mean Tsarist rule was essentially a dictatorship. The huge number of revolts faced by the Tsar were all dealt with in a similar way. Rather than having a divine right to rule, Lenin effectively created a dictatorship within the party, enabling him to rule Russia using dictatorial devices, although he can't actually be termed a dictator. The Cabinet became the Sovnarkom and Ministers became People's Commissars. Lenin believed only Bolsheviks could build the new world - so refused to invite other socialists into his government. He saw "political terror" as an inevitable stage in establishing the "dictatorship of the proletariat." Perhaps Lenin saw himself as a temporary dictator on the road to this ultimate goal. ...read more.

Conclusion

Between 1883 - 1903, there were 1500 revolts. Since there were only a few thousand law enforcement officers apart from the secret police, the army played a major part in maintaining law and order. The very fact that the army was central to the Tsar ruling Russia was quite dictatorial, in a similar way to the Cheka for the communists. The Cheka were not restricted by the law, and could execute people without trial (50000 people in 1918). At some point under communist rule, the Cheka, OGPU, NKVD and KGB were used to control the population. In conclusion, the initial statement is accurate. However, the Tsar's aims on controlling the population were motivated by his desire for the people to accept his divine right to rule and appreciate he was their autocratic ruler, whereas the Communists were simply forcing the population to remain submissive and accept what was happening to Russia even if they didn't like it. Similarly, it could be argued whether or not either regime was dictatorial. The Tsar was as much a dictator as any autocratic ruler. Theoretically, every later Tsar had to appease both the Reformists and the Traditionalists. However, the Westernisers desire for a constitution was never possible as it contradicted the Tsar's core beliefs. It could be argued that the Communist regime was more of a dictatorship than the Tsarist regime, both as a party ruling Russia and Lenin and Stalin as figures within the party. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. Why did the Tsarist regime fall in 1917?

    Some sections of the army turned on the Tsar and began fighting against him. Even though some soldiers remained loyal to the Tsar (we know this because they fought in the Russian civil war of 1918, to try to reinstate the Tsar) they would not be enough to save him.

  2. How effectively did the Soviet Union control Eastern Europe from 1945 to 1968?

    NATO - this not only gained support against the West, but also helped to unite a dividing sphere. This does not prove to be of any worth (at this time) as in the following year, Hungary has a revolution. There main aim was to get rid of Rakosi - a

  1. How Successful Were Stalin's Policies During His Leadership of the Soviet Union?

    Nonetheless Stalin did prove to be a very effective military leader and was able to quickly regain initiative in the war. A crucial decision made by Stalin was for the large-scale movement of the war industry to the east as this sustained the Red Army's war machine with astonishing success.

  2. Using these four passages and your own knowledge, explain how and why historians disagree ...

    But other historians believe that Lenin did exercise a "personal dictatorship" that was only "camouflaged by such formulas as 'democratic centralism' and the custom of de-emphasizing the role of individuals in favor of impersonal historic forces." These historians portray the role on Lenin as that of a despot who "never

  1. "Tsarism in Russia had been made secure by 1914." How far do you agree ...

    However, this was not the case. Ironically, it helped strengthened the Tsar's power. The forming of the Duma appeased the liberals and satisfied their appetite for reforms, hence they are willing to cooperate with the Tsar rather than confront Tsarism directly.

  2. "Stalin was personally responsible for the Purges in Russia in the 1930s". Agree or ...

    I believe, with the advantage of hindsight, that the methods and outcomes of the political purge were to rebuild the Communist Party in the image of Stalin 'The Great Leader'. This factor can be enhanced with the evidence that between 1936 and 1938, 850,000 (36%)

  1. In this essay I am going to asses the impact that Stalin had on ...

    Mistakes were made: machines were wrecked by unskilled workers, many of them ex-peasants who had been used to only the most primitive levels of technology. But these mistakes could not be admitted - the system could not be at fault.

  2. How important was Lenin compared to Stalin in creating the Soviet Union?

    peasants, workers, increasing Bolshevik control and improving personal freedom, all of this was taken away through war communism, which left children starving during a famine in 1921 and many harsh punishments were handed out for things as petty as not handing over surplus to the government.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work