• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Reichstag Fire

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The Reichstag Fire 1) Marinus Van der Lubbe's oral evidence at his trial is that he acted alone in starting the fire. That he was guilty there is little doubt. Not only did Rudolph Diels, the head of the Prussian political police, see him at the scene (after being arrested by Reichstag officials) but also Van der Lubbe proudly claimed responsibility for starting the fire at the trial. Rudolph Diels interviewed Van der Lubbe in the police headquarters on the evening of the fire. He formed the opinion that Van der Lubbe acted alone. Diels has stated that Van der Lubbe gave a series of confused stories. He also reported that Van der Lubbe was a madman. However, research into Van der Lubbe's background shows that he had a history of taking responsibility for things he had not done. While working for the Tielmann factory a strike broke out. Van der Lubbe claimed to the management to be the ringleader and offered to accept any punishment provided no one else was victimised even though he was far to inexperienced to have been seriously involved. ...read more.

Middle

Van der Lubbe confesses to Diel that he started other smaller fires in Berlin. Details provided by Van der Lubbe suggested that other communists helped him start those other fires and therefore following on from that Diel assumed that the there must have been assistance to Van Der Lubbe at the Rieichstag. There is no oral evidence from Van Der Lubbe at the trial that this was the case. 2) On the 27th February the Reichstag is empty as it had been in recess since December. At around 20:30 one of the caretakers checks the building and finds nothing unusual. At 20:50 a postman is passing the entrance to the session chamber and notices nothing unusual. At 21:05 a student sees a man carrying a burning brand on the first floor. By 21:14 the fire alarm is received by the local firestation and the firemen are in the building by 21:24 but fires are breaking out everywhere. At 21:27 there is a huge explosion and the great chamber is enveloped by flames. ...read more.

Conclusion

The cartoon shows Hindenburg handing over emergency powers and total dictatorship to Hitler by advising him to take advantage of the political situation. In contrast the cover of the book shows Van der Lubbe as part of an armed uprising. The cartoon in the British magazine is satire. This contrasts with the propaganda portrayed on the book cover. The Red Peril and the German book cover both agree that Hitler will be able to take total control of Germany because of the Reichstag fire. .................. 4) The Nazis wanted to blame the communists for the fire for political reasons. By blaming the communists for the fire the Reich president was able to pass a Decree for the Protection of People and State. The consequence of this was that the government were able to arrest leading communists and to ban them from the election campaign. The book was published in order try and convince people that the Nazis did not start the Reichstag fire. Another reason for publishing the book was to convince people to vote for the Nazis in the forthcoming election. The book, blaming the communists for starting the fire, gave Hitler the excuse for calling for new general elections in Germany ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Germany 1918-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Germany 1918-1939 essays

  1. The Reichstag Fire-Coursework B

    The book would help the Nazi cause. Question 5: Source E is a piece of secondary evidence given by Franz Halder in 1946. At the time he was on trial for war crimes during the Second World War, he blames Goring (a member of the Nazi party).

  2. The Reichstag Fire

    It was said that one man could not have started a fire that caused so much destruction. The Reichstag fire helped the Nazi's as the following week it was the election and communist support decreased, meaning the nazis got over 50% of the votes which they wanted.

  1. GCSE History Coursework: Reichstag Fire 1) ...

    The fire was only a week before the German elections that Hitler had organised, hoping that he could get over 50% of the votes and therefore could rule as a dictator. The fire was very useful to Hitler, because he could blame it on Van der Lubbe, who was a

  2. Reichstag fire coursework assignments

    police authority to search houses, confiscate property and hold people in prison without a trail, it made it possible to dictate the death penalty for a varied range of crimes, the police also was able to ban meetings , take political opponents and take them to their impetuously organised concentration

  1. History Coursework – the Reichstag Fire

    The fire was rumoured to have been started or encouraged by the fifth Roman Emperor, Nero, who was in power at the time. The Fire of Rome was convenient for Nero as it quickly set fire to the homes of Nero's enemies in the rich part of the city.

  2. Modern World History Coursework - Reichstag Sourcework

    helped him start these other fires might have helped him with the Reichstag fire'. Apart from being a direct contradiction between each other, Diels also expresses a great deal of uncertainty in these quotes, mainly by making use of the words 'believe', 'suggested' and 'might'.

  1. Source based work about Van der Lubbe's involvement in the Reichstag fire of February ...

    This is unlikely if Lubbe was actually working for the Communists, so it shows that the Communists were framed, or that Diels is trying to blame the Communists to the maximum extent because he wants to free the Nazis and himself from blame.

  2. Who was responsible for the Reichstag fire?

    On the other hand Van der Lubbe might have received help from other communists to set on the fire and that he, in source B, was covering them up. 2. How reliable is this account? Explain your answer. The account in source A was written a long period of time

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work