• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Reichstag Fire

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The Reichstag Fire 1) Marinus Van der Lubbe's oral evidence at his trial is that he acted alone in starting the fire. That he was guilty there is little doubt. Not only did Rudolph Diels, the head of the Prussian political police, see him at the scene (after being arrested by Reichstag officials) but also Van der Lubbe proudly claimed responsibility for starting the fire at the trial. Rudolph Diels interviewed Van der Lubbe in the police headquarters on the evening of the fire. He formed the opinion that Van der Lubbe acted alone. Diels has stated that Van der Lubbe gave a series of confused stories. He also reported that Van der Lubbe was a madman. However, research into Van der Lubbe's background shows that he had a history of taking responsibility for things he had not done. While working for the Tielmann factory a strike broke out. Van der Lubbe claimed to the management to be the ringleader and offered to accept any punishment provided no one else was victimised even though he was far to inexperienced to have been seriously involved. ...read more.

Middle

Van der Lubbe confesses to Diel that he started other smaller fires in Berlin. Details provided by Van der Lubbe suggested that other communists helped him start those other fires and therefore following on from that Diel assumed that the there must have been assistance to Van Der Lubbe at the Rieichstag. There is no oral evidence from Van Der Lubbe at the trial that this was the case. 2) On the 27th February the Reichstag is empty as it had been in recess since December. At around 20:30 one of the caretakers checks the building and finds nothing unusual. At 20:50 a postman is passing the entrance to the session chamber and notices nothing unusual. At 21:05 a student sees a man carrying a burning brand on the first floor. By 21:14 the fire alarm is received by the local firestation and the firemen are in the building by 21:24 but fires are breaking out everywhere. At 21:27 there is a huge explosion and the great chamber is enveloped by flames. ...read more.

Conclusion

The cartoon shows Hindenburg handing over emergency powers and total dictatorship to Hitler by advising him to take advantage of the political situation. In contrast the cover of the book shows Van der Lubbe as part of an armed uprising. The cartoon in the British magazine is satire. This contrasts with the propaganda portrayed on the book cover. The Red Peril and the German book cover both agree that Hitler will be able to take total control of Germany because of the Reichstag fire. .................. 4) The Nazis wanted to blame the communists for the fire for political reasons. By blaming the communists for the fire the Reich president was able to pass a Decree for the Protection of People and State. The consequence of this was that the government were able to arrest leading communists and to ban them from the election campaign. The book was published in order try and convince people that the Nazis did not start the Reichstag fire. Another reason for publishing the book was to convince people to vote for the Nazis in the forthcoming election. The book, blaming the communists for starting the fire, gave Hitler the excuse for calling for new general elections in Germany ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Germany 1918-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Germany 1918-1939 essays

  1. The Reichstag Fire

    It was said that one man could not have started a fire that caused so much destruction. The Reichstag fire helped the Nazi's as the following week it was the election and communist support decreased, meaning the nazis got over 50% of the votes which they wanted.

  2. GCSE History Coursework: Reichstag Fire 1) ...

    The fire was only a week before the German elections that Hitler had organised, hoping that he could get over 50% of the votes and therefore could rule as a dictator. The fire was very useful to Hitler, because he could blame it on Van der Lubbe, who was a

  1. History Coursework – the Reichstag Fire

    We later see how Hitler takes advantage of events when he re-militarises the Rhineland and this supports the view that Hitler is an opportunist. Source D is the cover of a book released by the Nazis entitled "Armed Uprising". It is written by a Nazi and published shortly after the Reichstag fire.

  2. IGCSE History Coursework Assignment B - Source Analysis of the Reichstag Fire

    Therefore, he had to get rid of the communists. He did this by blaming van der Lubbe and his communist friends for setting the fire off. Van der Lubbe admitted that he was the only one who set the fire.

  1. Studies of Sources from the Reichstag Fire - who was responsible?

    'No doubt' and 'panic' are stretches of the truth. Some elements of this report can be used as reliable pieces of information as some of the ideas mentioned in Source C were similar to those mentioned in A. For example, Rudolf Diels stated in Source A 'Goering sent orders that

  2. Analysis of the Sources on the Reichstag Fire.

    The number of weapons was increasing. So C + D don't really agree on most the things but they have completely opposite meanings. Q3. Study source D Use the source and your own knowledge of the period to explain why the Nazis would want to publish a book like this one?

  1. Who was responsible for the Reichstag fire?

    On the other hand Van der Lubbe might have received help from other communists to set on the fire and that he, in source B, was covering them up. 2. How reliable is this account? Explain your answer. The account in source A was written a long period of time

  2. Modern World History Coursework - Reichstag Sourcework

    2. How reliable is this account? Explain your answer using the source and your own knowledge. Source A is an account by the head of the Prussian political police. Although the account he gives is very detailed, there are some major concerns when using it as a primary source.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work