• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Reichstag Fire

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The Reichstag Fire 1) Marinus Van der Lubbe's oral evidence at his trial is that he acted alone in starting the fire. That he was guilty there is little doubt. Not only did Rudolph Diels, the head of the Prussian political police, see him at the scene (after being arrested by Reichstag officials) but also Van der Lubbe proudly claimed responsibility for starting the fire at the trial. Rudolph Diels interviewed Van der Lubbe in the police headquarters on the evening of the fire. He formed the opinion that Van der Lubbe acted alone. Diels has stated that Van der Lubbe gave a series of confused stories. He also reported that Van der Lubbe was a madman. However, research into Van der Lubbe's background shows that he had a history of taking responsibility for things he had not done. While working for the Tielmann factory a strike broke out. Van der Lubbe claimed to the management to be the ringleader and offered to accept any punishment provided no one else was victimised even though he was far to inexperienced to have been seriously involved. ...read more.

Middle

Van der Lubbe confesses to Diel that he started other smaller fires in Berlin. Details provided by Van der Lubbe suggested that other communists helped him start those other fires and therefore following on from that Diel assumed that the there must have been assistance to Van Der Lubbe at the Rieichstag. There is no oral evidence from Van Der Lubbe at the trial that this was the case. 2) On the 27th February the Reichstag is empty as it had been in recess since December. At around 20:30 one of the caretakers checks the building and finds nothing unusual. At 20:50 a postman is passing the entrance to the session chamber and notices nothing unusual. At 21:05 a student sees a man carrying a burning brand on the first floor. By 21:14 the fire alarm is received by the local firestation and the firemen are in the building by 21:24 but fires are breaking out everywhere. At 21:27 there is a huge explosion and the great chamber is enveloped by flames. ...read more.

Conclusion

The cartoon shows Hindenburg handing over emergency powers and total dictatorship to Hitler by advising him to take advantage of the political situation. In contrast the cover of the book shows Van der Lubbe as part of an armed uprising. The cartoon in the British magazine is satire. This contrasts with the propaganda portrayed on the book cover. The Red Peril and the German book cover both agree that Hitler will be able to take total control of Germany because of the Reichstag fire. .................. 4) The Nazis wanted to blame the communists for the fire for political reasons. By blaming the communists for the fire the Reich president was able to pass a Decree for the Protection of People and State. The consequence of this was that the government were able to arrest leading communists and to ban them from the election campaign. The book was published in order try and convince people that the Nazis did not start the Reichstag fire. Another reason for publishing the book was to convince people to vote for the Nazis in the forthcoming election. The book, blaming the communists for starting the fire, gave Hitler the excuse for calling for new general elections in Germany ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Germany 1918-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Germany 1918-1939 essays

  1. The Reichstag Fire

    It was said that one man could not have started a fire that caused so much destruction. The Reichstag fire helped the Nazi's as the following week it was the election and communist support decreased, meaning the nazis got over 50% of the votes which they wanted.

  2. History Coursework – the Reichstag Fire

    They look across to Van der Lubbe with guns - they are possibly meant to be common people who are against the Communists or Van der Lubbe. The fact they have guns pointing at Van der Lubbe suggests security and control emitted by the Nazis.

  1. IGCSE History Coursework Assignment B - Source Analysis of the Reichstag Fire

    Hitler was afraid that people would prefer the communists rather than the Nazi party. He wanted to make sure that his opposition was gone. Another event that might scare the Nazis was the Spartacist Uprising in 1919. The Spartacists party name was later changed to the Communisty Party of Germany (KPD).

  2. Studies of Sources from the Reichstag Fire - who was responsible?

    Source E is reliable in some ways. This extract from Rauschning's book states that he 'discovered that the National Socialist leadership was solely responsible and that Hitler knew of the plan and approved it' which shows he is not being biased towards Germany, which you would probably think as he was a German.

  1. Modern World History Coursework - Reichstag Sourcework

    All of the accusations involving Marinus Van Der Lubbe also rely very heavily on Diels own fragile opinions, none of which are reinforced by facts and actual evidence form the time of the incident. An example of one of these indictments is when Diels states that 'He had been so

  2. GCSE History Coursework: Reichstag Fire 1) ...

    Diels makes two remarks in this source that contradict each other: 'The voluntary confessions of Van der Lubbe made me believe he had acted alone' contradicts 'Several other details suggested that Communists that helped him start these other fires, might also have helped him with the Reichstag Fire'.

  1. The Reichstag Fire-Coursework B

    the ones who were arrested did not have much power in the party. However, the con's are, Diels report had a lot of detail saying he wrote it over 12 years after the fire. Therefore lots could have been made up.

  2. Analysis of the Sources on the Reichstag Fire.

    Q2. Study sources C + D How far do sources C + D agree about the events surroundings the Reichstag fire? Explain your answer. Source C is showing us that Hitler thinks he is "it" and that he is strong and tough we can see this by how he is standing

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work