• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Reichstag Fire

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The Reichstag Fire 1) Marinus Van der Lubbe's oral evidence at his trial is that he acted alone in starting the fire. That he was guilty there is little doubt. Not only did Rudolph Diels, the head of the Prussian political police, see him at the scene (after being arrested by Reichstag officials) but also Van der Lubbe proudly claimed responsibility for starting the fire at the trial. Rudolph Diels interviewed Van der Lubbe in the police headquarters on the evening of the fire. He formed the opinion that Van der Lubbe acted alone. Diels has stated that Van der Lubbe gave a series of confused stories. He also reported that Van der Lubbe was a madman. However, research into Van der Lubbe's background shows that he had a history of taking responsibility for things he had not done. While working for the Tielmann factory a strike broke out. Van der Lubbe claimed to the management to be the ringleader and offered to accept any punishment provided no one else was victimised even though he was far to inexperienced to have been seriously involved. ...read more.

Middle

Van der Lubbe confesses to Diel that he started other smaller fires in Berlin. Details provided by Van der Lubbe suggested that other communists helped him start those other fires and therefore following on from that Diel assumed that the there must have been assistance to Van Der Lubbe at the Rieichstag. There is no oral evidence from Van Der Lubbe at the trial that this was the case. 2) On the 27th February the Reichstag is empty as it had been in recess since December. At around 20:30 one of the caretakers checks the building and finds nothing unusual. At 20:50 a postman is passing the entrance to the session chamber and notices nothing unusual. At 21:05 a student sees a man carrying a burning brand on the first floor. By 21:14 the fire alarm is received by the local firestation and the firemen are in the building by 21:24 but fires are breaking out everywhere. At 21:27 there is a huge explosion and the great chamber is enveloped by flames. ...read more.

Conclusion

The cartoon shows Hindenburg handing over emergency powers and total dictatorship to Hitler by advising him to take advantage of the political situation. In contrast the cover of the book shows Van der Lubbe as part of an armed uprising. The cartoon in the British magazine is satire. This contrasts with the propaganda portrayed on the book cover. The Red Peril and the German book cover both agree that Hitler will be able to take total control of Germany because of the Reichstag fire. .................. 4) The Nazis wanted to blame the communists for the fire for political reasons. By blaming the communists for the fire the Reich president was able to pass a Decree for the Protection of People and State. The consequence of this was that the government were able to arrest leading communists and to ban them from the election campaign. The book was published in order try and convince people that the Nazis did not start the Reichstag fire. Another reason for publishing the book was to convince people to vote for the Nazis in the forthcoming election. The book, blaming the communists for starting the fire, gave Hitler the excuse for calling for new general elections in Germany ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Germany 1918-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Germany 1918-1939 essays

  1. The Reichstag Fire-Coursework B

    Source F is a piece of secondary evidence given by Goring at his trial for war crimes. He is replying to Halder's accusations that he started the fire. Source G is a piece of primary evidence, it is a confession saying that Karl Ernst (leader of the S.A)

  2. The Reichstag Fire

    It was said that one man could not have started a fire that caused so much destruction. The Reichstag fire helped the Nazi's as the following week it was the election and communist support decreased, meaning the nazis got over 50% of the votes which they wanted.

  1. GCSE History Coursework: Reichstag Fire 1) ...

    Communist, and as the Communists were one of his main rivals in the elections he could use the fire as propaganda for the Nazis in proving that the Communists were no good. The togas that the two men are wearing in this image could be taken to mean different things.

  2. Studies of Sources from the Reichstag Fire - who was responsible?

    for example The Express that Delmer wrote for, which supported Hitler's views and showed him in a good light, this Source cannot be completely reliable. The title 'The Germans and I' suggests Delmer was quite close with Germany; in particular Adolf Hitler so therefore may be biased.

  1. Modern World History Coursework - Reichstag Sourcework

    Numerous times he states his opinions as if they are actual fact, when actually they are merely based on his interpretation of minor details such as facial expression. An example of these assumptions is when Rudolf Diels claims that 'There was a wild triumphant gleam in they eyes of his

  2. Reichstag fire coursework assignments

    Question 2 The Nazis was successful but they weren't popular they hadn't gotten more than 50 seats in the Reichstag election; in July 1932 they proceeded to peak, then they decreased in November. Although the Nazis didn't have as much people voting for them, than against them, they did have one third of all the votes' cats in 1932.

  1. History Coursework – the Reichstag Fire

    The criminals have thought this out beautifully". He uses the word "Criminal" in plural, which suggests his belief that more than one person planned the Reichstag. Source B does not either support or contradict this comment, as Van der Lubbe only says he set fire to the Reichstag by himself.

  2. Who was responsible for the Reichstag fire?

    On the other hand Van der Lubbe might have received help from other communists to set on the fire and that he, in source B, was covering them up. 2. How reliable is this account? Explain your answer. The account in source A was written a long period of time

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work