• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Reichstag Fire

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The Reichstag Fire On the 27th February 1933, the Reichstag building was destroyed by a fire. The fire spread so quickly that is was believed to be arson. Marinus Van der Lubbe, a young Dutchman of low intelligence was arrested. Van der Lubbe was caught at the Reichstag building with matches and firelighters. Van Der Lubbe admitted to committing the crime, he was then tried and executed. The Nazi government claimed that it was the communists first move in a conspiracy to unleash a revolution in Germany . However others believed that the Nazis had caused the fire with Van Der Lubbe so as to provide an excuse for taking emergency measures against Germany's left wing parties. Finally, recent evidence suggests that Van Der Lubbe was responsible for starting the fire and that the Nazis had exploited the incident. Many people wonder if Van Der Lubbe did actually tell the truth or did the Nazis want an excuse to ban the communists and win the election on March the 5th. The rise of the nazis Adolf Hitler was a soldier who fought in the German army during World war 1. It had a huge effect on him as it was ''the first real purpose of his life'' and turned him into a very patriotic man. He was proud to be alive at such a time and felt great pride in representing his country. ...read more.

Middle

In 1929 Wall street in America crashed, causing a world wide depression which resulted in high numbers of unemployment. This was a chance for the Nazi party to offer a way out of the depression and to come up with some solutions for the unemployment. They promised tax cuts to the farmers which were now needed and also promised an increase in jobs. In the years following 1929, two parties benefited the most; the Nazis and the communists. In 1928 the nazis had 12 seats - in 1930 they had 107. The rise in votes meant that the Two parties were not bitter rivals and competed fiercely against each other to get elected into power. Source A6 is useful to a historian studying why people voted for the nazis because it was written by a leading nazi, Albert Speer writing in his memories after world war 2. This is a primary source and is therefore more reliable. It explains how he and his mother saw how the nazi party would bring hope to Germany. They liked the fact that the storm troops were on patrol and had things under control. This source may be slightly un reliable because it could be biased as he was a member of the nazi party. It may not be very useful to a historian because he was a member therefore only gave his point of view which was positive unlike other people who may have had different reasons for supporting the nazis. ...read more.

Conclusion

believe that he could not have started the fire alone as he was deformed and half blind so they concluded that other communists were also to blame. Other sources claim that there were seven people involved in plotting and committing the fire, these seven were: -Karl Ernst -Heines and Schultz (who were SA men) -Goering and Goerbels (who were Hitler's right hand men) -Sandler(who looked after Van Der Lubbe) -and Van Der Lubbe himself The SA men wanted to set fire to the building because they believed that they would be serving Hitler and doing him proud. An English journalist wrote source C1, it explains how ''even Hitler himself was not absolutely certain that the fire was a communist plot''. Him seeing Hitler acting this way with Goebbles will have made his suspicion of the nazi's plotting the fire no more. Source C2 is a report in ''the times'' newspaper which was a report issued by the Prussian authorities about how much the communists were to blame. This source is probably biased because the Prussian authorities were Nazis. In my opinion the Nazis put Van der lubbe up to setting the Reichstag building on fire. I think this because Van Der Lubbe would not have been able to commit the crime himself as he was mentally and physically disabled. I think he was set up by the Nazis because the Nazis wanted to secure their seat so thought that using a 'dumb' communist would set them up. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Germany 1918-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Germany 1918-1939 essays

  1. The Reichstag Fire-Coursework B

    Both sources actually show the Nazis exploiting the situation. In source C it shows that Hitler will become dictator because of the power he will gain from the situation. Source D, however, is warning people that the communists are trying to take power forcibly.

  2. Reichstag fire coursework assignments

    In 1934 a power struggle had developed in the Nazi leadership, so Hitler had to make a choice between the SA and the army. Hitler needed the SA to put his policies into action, the SA had fought with Hitler in the 1923 Munich putsch and in later fights against

  1. History Coursework – the Reichstag Fire

    We later see how Hitler takes advantage of events when he re-militarises the Rhineland and this supports the view that Hitler is an opportunist. Source D is the cover of a book released by the Nazis entitled "Armed Uprising". It is written by a Nazi and published shortly after the Reichstag fire.

  2. IGCSE History Coursework Assignment B - Source Analysis of the Reichstag Fire

    The Nazis would want to publish a book like this because it is propaganda and it could change people's opinion on the communist party. Up until 27th of February in 1933, one of Hitler's tasks was to get rid of his oppositions.

  1. Modern World History Coursework - Reichstag Sourcework

    busy he had started several dozen fires in different places in the Reichstag'. There were no eyewitnesses, forensic evidence or any other confirmation of this occurring. Diels has based his opinion on his own, unsubstantiated views and ignored any proof that existed at the time.

  2. GCSE History Coursework: Reichstag Fire 1) ...

    If you can't be a dictator now, you never will be'. The title of the image is 'The Red Peril'. Hindenburg was allowed by Article 48 of the Weimar Constitution to issue certain decrees in an emergency; these were sometimes known as the 'Emergency Powers'.

  1. Nazism and the New Age.

    On the contrary, Pius XII was so highly esteemed that at his death (1958), Israel's Foreign Minister Golda Meir eulogized him in the name of the Jewish State, and the Israeli public called for a forest of 860,000 trees to be planted in honor of the estimated number of Jews saved by this Righteous Gentile.

  2. Who was responsible for the Reichstag fire?

    This, again, could be a result of Van der Lubbe covering up the other Communists from the Nazis. In conclusion, Source A is supported by source B by the fact that Van der Lubbe confessed and that he acted alone.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work