• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Reichstag Fire

Extracts from this document...


The Reichstag Fire On the 27th February 1933, the Reichstag building was destroyed by a fire. The fire spread so quickly that is was believed to be arson. Marinus Van der Lubbe, a young Dutchman of low intelligence was arrested. Van der Lubbe was caught at the Reichstag building with matches and firelighters. Van Der Lubbe admitted to committing the crime, he was then tried and executed. The Nazi government claimed that it was the communists first move in a conspiracy to unleash a revolution in Germany . However others believed that the Nazis had caused the fire with Van Der Lubbe so as to provide an excuse for taking emergency measures against Germany's left wing parties. Finally, recent evidence suggests that Van Der Lubbe was responsible for starting the fire and that the Nazis had exploited the incident. Many people wonder if Van Der Lubbe did actually tell the truth or did the Nazis want an excuse to ban the communists and win the election on March the 5th. The rise of the nazis Adolf Hitler was a soldier who fought in the German army during World war 1. It had a huge effect on him as it was ''the first real purpose of his life'' and turned him into a very patriotic man. He was proud to be alive at such a time and felt great pride in representing his country. ...read more.


In 1929 Wall street in America crashed, causing a world wide depression which resulted in high numbers of unemployment. This was a chance for the Nazi party to offer a way out of the depression and to come up with some solutions for the unemployment. They promised tax cuts to the farmers which were now needed and also promised an increase in jobs. In the years following 1929, two parties benefited the most; the Nazis and the communists. In 1928 the nazis had 12 seats - in 1930 they had 107. The rise in votes meant that the Two parties were not bitter rivals and competed fiercely against each other to get elected into power. Source A6 is useful to a historian studying why people voted for the nazis because it was written by a leading nazi, Albert Speer writing in his memories after world war 2. This is a primary source and is therefore more reliable. It explains how he and his mother saw how the nazi party would bring hope to Germany. They liked the fact that the storm troops were on patrol and had things under control. This source may be slightly un reliable because it could be biased as he was a member of the nazi party. It may not be very useful to a historian because he was a member therefore only gave his point of view which was positive unlike other people who may have had different reasons for supporting the nazis. ...read more.


believe that he could not have started the fire alone as he was deformed and half blind so they concluded that other communists were also to blame. Other sources claim that there were seven people involved in plotting and committing the fire, these seven were: -Karl Ernst -Heines and Schultz (who were SA men) -Goering and Goerbels (who were Hitler's right hand men) -Sandler(who looked after Van Der Lubbe) -and Van Der Lubbe himself The SA men wanted to set fire to the building because they believed that they would be serving Hitler and doing him proud. An English journalist wrote source C1, it explains how ''even Hitler himself was not absolutely certain that the fire was a communist plot''. Him seeing Hitler acting this way with Goebbles will have made his suspicion of the nazi's plotting the fire no more. Source C2 is a report in ''the times'' newspaper which was a report issued by the Prussian authorities about how much the communists were to blame. This source is probably biased because the Prussian authorities were Nazis. In my opinion the Nazis put Van der lubbe up to setting the Reichstag building on fire. I think this because Van Der Lubbe would not have been able to commit the crime himself as he was mentally and physically disabled. I think he was set up by the Nazis because the Nazis wanted to secure their seat so thought that using a 'dumb' communist would set them up. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Germany 1918-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Germany 1918-1939 essays

  1. IGCSE History Coursework Assignment B - Source Analysis of the Reichstag Fire

    He had only 196 seats in the Reichstag, which was only 20.4% of the whole seats. The communists have 100 seats, which was 16.9% of the whole Reichstag seats. Hitler had to have 50% of the seats if he wanted total control over Germany.

  2. History Coursework – the Reichstag Fire

    They look across to Van der Lubbe with guns - they are possibly meant to be common people who are against the Communists or Van der Lubbe. The fact they have guns pointing at Van der Lubbe suggests security and control emitted by the Nazis.

  1. Studies of Sources from the Reichstag Fire - who was responsible?

    of the 27th February is quite unreliable and therefore is not useful to determine what actually happened on that night. Even though Source C is a useful example of Goebbels' work as Minister of Propaganda, which can show us Nazi views, it is that which makes this source untrustworthy so

  2. GCSE History Coursework: Reichstag Fire 1) ...

    The title of the cartoon, I think, is also important. 'The Red Peril' could be taken to mean different things: 'Red' means Communist, and 'Peril' obviously means danger. But is this title saying 'Danger of the Communists', which would mean the artist was either for the Nazis or neutral, but

  1. Modern World History Coursework - Reichstag Sourcework

    helped him start these other fires might have helped him with the Reichstag fire'. Apart from being a direct contradiction between each other, Diels also expresses a great deal of uncertainty in these quotes, mainly by making use of the words 'believe', 'suggested' and 'might'.

  2. The two sources are extracts that address the issue of the Reichstag Fire that ...

    Source A is written by Academic historians, so it can be regarded that thorough research has gone in to it. It is quite recent, written in the year 2000 and so there is no reason not to assume that it is accurate and up to date, as academic historians have

  1. The Reichstag Fire-Coursework B

    The source is also supported by others. Source B, Van der Lubbe saying he started the fire, and source H where it says that if the Nazis did start the fire they would have planned who to arrest so that they could destroy the communists. This didn't happen, the Nazis used out-of-date lists to make arrests and

  2. Why did the Nazis set fire to the Reichstag

    And over the next eighteen months Hitler eliminated all political oppositions and was on his way to absolute power and Germany soon became a one-party state. The mean of this is to consolidate their power throughout the government since the communist was always their biggest threat.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work