• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The sources A-F all show the different impact and success of Volksgemeinschaft in Germany between 1933-1939. By using varying links and contradictions between all of these sources I will try to determine the success and failure of Nazi Vloksgemeinschaf.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The sources A-F all show the different impact and success of Volksgemeinschaft in Germany between 1933-1939. By using varying links and contradictions between all of these sources I will try to determine the success and failure of Nazi Vloksgemeinschaft. Volksgemeinschaft when translated means "peoples community". It was the Nazi ideology to try and create a perfect German society, which would be united through different factors, including race, blood and traditional values. Hitler's aim was to create a class-less society and return German people to a rural way of life; this in turn would lead to a total loss of individuality. This society included the creation of a "master race", or "Herrenvolk", of Aryan Germans, this would include Hitler's ideal humans whose characteristics must of included, blonde hair, blue eyes and a strong athletic build. This was thought to be based on Darwin's theory of evolution, stating that the white male was the most highly evolved being. The nazi propaganda poster and Melita Maschmann both show the Nazi commitment to creating unity and ultimately achieving their main goal of Volksgemeinschaft. ...read more.

Middle

The subjective view in a satirical tone also affects the reliability of his comments. However, in contrast, Ian Kershaw's cynical view of the Nazi success in creating Volksgemeinschaft highlights the lack of any "social revolution". He refers to how Nazi ideology and values had barely any affect on the German publics consciousness. This is shown as the German people continued with traditional class-values which the Nazi's aimed to abolish. Similar to this, Phillip Gibbs who was a non-German journalist gives his account of indifference in Berlin 1034. He explains how "no one in the crowded caf� listened to Adolf Hitler" when a Nazi broadcast was on the radio. This supports the idea that people of the German community were not affected by Nazi ideas. However, Gibbs only gives an account of one caf�, this does not give a fair representation of the whole Germany. There is evidence which shows some did accept Nazi ideology but it cannot be found in this source. Gibbs account also highlights the failure to create Volksgemeinschaft nationally, which was ultimately the Nazi's main aim. ...read more.

Conclusion

As Kershaw is a respected Nazi Germany historian his source quite rightly contains a lot of information on the area of Volksgemeinschaft. Although because of his experience with this area of history he is subjective, like many other historians, as he will of created his own views on the subject over time. In conclusion I believe that the impact of Volksgemeinschaft policy on those inside it was not always as intended, and although the Nazi's had some success, the failure to create national unity was a huge failure and Nazi's were unable to prevent opposition in peoples minds. Mainly the sources show the failure of Volksgemeinschaft, although you do get aspects of success. It is clear that the differing views and opinions found in the sources show the different experiences of those involved at the time, different perceptions of the past and also the lack of sources. It would be impossible to get an accurate view of the past from six sources and the question could never be answered fully, also the success of Volkgemeinschaft can never be accurately determined, as any interpretations of the past will always contain aspects of subjections. By Richard Carter 12/5 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Germany 1918-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Germany 1918-1939 essays

  1. To What Extent Was Nazi Germany a Totalitarian State 1933-1939?

    The general impression of resistance towards the nazi party was little. Many Germans supported nazi regime out Hitler's personal popularity. On the other hand you could argue that the reason for the lack of opposition was through fear of consequences.

  2. Describe how Jews were discriminated against in Germany from 1933 to 1939

    Even as the Nazis weakened in the last years of the war, precious military resources such as fuel, transport, munitions, soldiers and industrial resources were still being heavily diverted away from the war and towards the death camps.

  1. Representations 1,2 and 3 all give an idea of how the Nazis were so ...

    so you have to wonder whether Niemoller wrote this speech as a means of reconciling to those he did not care about before his own belief was put on the spotlight, or if he genuinely meant was he said and it was for no personal gain.

  2. To what extent did the Nazis achieve an economic miracle in Germany between 1933-1939?

    to repair the damage created by the Weimar government and the Great Depression. However, during the 1932 Nazi leadership there was a change to the approaches to the issue of the economy. Firstly, there was the policy of autarky (self-sufficiency).

  1. Between 1933 and 1945 Hitler and the Nazi Part were successful in their creation ...

    Many farmers actually benefited from these policies, for example the mortgage interest of farmers was cut down by $280 million in the period of 1934-38, the tax burden was cut by $6\0 million in the same period, while 600 thousand farmlands became hereditary, and farming income rose back to the level before the depression.

  2. Daily Life in Nazi Germany:

    According to Adolf Hitler, Jews were responsible for everything he did not like, including modern art, pornography and prostitution. Hitler also alleged that the Jews had been responsible for losing the First World War. Hitler also claimed that Jews, who were only about 1% of the population, were slowly taking over the country.

  1. Do sources A-F support the view that the Nazis succeeded in creating a Volksgemeinschaft ...

    Source B shows that people could ignore the Nazi message, but source F shows the outward opposition that existed towards Nazism. 11/2 million leaflets are not a lot compared to the total population, however we must realise that there was probably a lot that the Gestapo didn't seize, and if

  2. Holocaust Sources Questions

    in secrecy "by carrying it out in a remote part of Poland." The author says that rumours circulated about the dreadful deeds but many Germans "were indifferent to the fate of the Jews." The Nazis denied most of the rumours by saying that the Jews where being resettled.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work