• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

These sources are not about Haig and the Battle of the Somme. How far do you agree hat they have no use for the historians studying Haig and the Battle of the Somme?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

History Coursework Coursework 2C Study Source D and E. These sources are not about Haig and the Battle of the Somme. How far do you agree hat they have no use for the historians studying Haig and the Battle of the Somme? Source D is useful to us as it is based on true historical events. Even though truth is exaggerated people know what events are being talked about. Source D is a picture form Black adder once popular war comedy. It is being useful as it shows different opinions about war and General Haig, who in this source is directly referred to as "Field Marshall Haig is about to.." it also gives us some historical facts like "six inches closer to the enemy" it in the funny and sarcastic way explains to us that Britain haven't gained too much land during Battle Of The Somme. ...read more.

Middle

The second source(source E) is also biased towards Haig but might be more useful as it was not written or drew to entertain as such. So when comparing those two sources we might say that the next source is more of a use to historians. Source E is a cartoon from a British magazine published in February 1917.It is again really biased like the first source we had look at towards Haig. The cartoon is not so bad as such is the writing after it which is full of biased comments towards the general. On the picture we can see a soldier looking like drawn from Haig's profile and underneath it there is a piece of text. ...read more.

Conclusion

The drawbacks on this source are that its creator seems not to like Haig and make him look stupid and unspecialised. So there also might be a bit of a truth lack showing Haig from his good side. I personally think that it is actually useful for historians to study both of those sources as they show different views about Haig. It teaches historians what people in Britain who should support the army and it's General during the times of war, had actually been saying and showing to the public. It shows historians what people felt as well as what they saw Haig as. So I don't think we can say that they are useless to historians studying Battle of the Somme. ?? ?? ?? ?? Work by: Anika Kloska 10 SG ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. General Haig - Butcher or Hero?

    There is some good evidence given here, arguing that Haig and other generals deserved more credit. But I do feel that evidence to the contrary provides a stronger argument for him and other generals deserving more credit, but he opposite side provides a strong opposition as to whether Haig deserved more credit.

  2. The Battle of the Somme - source related study

    3. Source 15.I is taken from a novel. How does this make a difference to its value as a source of information about the Battle of the Somme? Source 15.J is a novel, which I think makes it a less reliable source, which is because of a few reasons.

  1. Case study: The Battle of the Somme.

    Many South African troops lost their lives in the six day struggle for the Deville wood.

  2. The Somme - source related study.

    (Zero hour) However, at 7:20, an officer blew his mine at the Hawthorn Redoubt. This was a costly error. It provoked a German artillery bombardment on all the packed British trenches in the area, and helped the Germans to get poised and ready for the British assault.

  1. Windsor Coursework

    The council may have plans to widen roads and pavements to lessen the congestion cause by the tourist thus making life easier for both residents and tourists. Conclusion The information that I have gathered (primary and secondary)

  2. Haig and 'The Battle of the Somme' - source related study.

    Another factor that might cause me to question his reliability would be the fact the interview was taken years after the battle whereas his account could be less accurate than straight after his experience.

  1. Dunkirk and The Battle of Britain - Why was Britain able to win the ...

    He was the Minister of War, working for the government, so might have only said what the government wanted him to say or what they wanted the British public to hear - spin. This is a contemporaneous source. Source E is a report from a British newspaper, The Daily Express,

  2. The Battle of the Somme

    The bombardment was a failure for a number of reasons. Firstly, the Germans knew the attack was coming- spy planes and balloons saw the arrival of fresh troops and supplies. Therefore, they weren't surprised when the bombardment started. They had practised retreating from their trenches into deeper underground dug-outs- when the bombardment began they sheltered in these.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work