• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

These sources are not about Haig and the Battle of the Somme. How far do you agree hat they have no use for the historians studying Haig and the Battle of the Somme?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

History Coursework Coursework 2C Study Source D and E. These sources are not about Haig and the Battle of the Somme. How far do you agree hat they have no use for the historians studying Haig and the Battle of the Somme? Source D is useful to us as it is based on true historical events. Even though truth is exaggerated people know what events are being talked about. Source D is a picture form Black adder once popular war comedy. It is being useful as it shows different opinions about war and General Haig, who in this source is directly referred to as "Field Marshall Haig is about to.." it also gives us some historical facts like "six inches closer to the enemy" it in the funny and sarcastic way explains to us that Britain haven't gained too much land during Battle Of The Somme. ...read more.

Middle

The second source(source E) is also biased towards Haig but might be more useful as it was not written or drew to entertain as such. So when comparing those two sources we might say that the next source is more of a use to historians. Source E is a cartoon from a British magazine published in February 1917.It is again really biased like the first source we had look at towards Haig. The cartoon is not so bad as such is the writing after it which is full of biased comments towards the general. On the picture we can see a soldier looking like drawn from Haig's profile and underneath it there is a piece of text. ...read more.

Conclusion

The drawbacks on this source are that its creator seems not to like Haig and make him look stupid and unspecialised. So there also might be a bit of a truth lack showing Haig from his good side. I personally think that it is actually useful for historians to study both of those sources as they show different views about Haig. It teaches historians what people in Britain who should support the army and it's General during the times of war, had actually been saying and showing to the public. It shows historians what people felt as well as what they saw Haig as. So I don't think we can say that they are useless to historians studying Battle of the Somme. ?? ?? ?? ?? Work by: Anika Kloska 10 SG ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. General Haig - Butcher or Hero?

    There is some good evidence given here, arguing that Haig and other generals deserved more credit. But I do feel that evidence to the contrary provides a stronger argument for him and other generals deserving more credit, but he opposite side provides a strong opposition as to whether Haig deserved more credit.

  2. Case study: The Battle of the Somme.

    Last Attack The last attack came on the 13th November. The attack was centred on Beaumont Hamel. 30,000lbs of explosives had exploded under the German lines and was followed by men going over the top. After the deaths of these men the attack was finally halted and the battle of the Somme was over.

  1. The Battle of the Somme - source related study

    So, because it was a personal account, his experience may have been different other soldiers at the Somme. This source was written in 1916, about the battle of the Somme, to inform people about it and to entertain them, because it is a novel.

  2. The Battle of the Somme

    The bombardment was a failure for a number of reasons. Firstly, the Germans knew the attack was coming- spy planes and balloons saw the arrival of fresh troops and supplies. Therefore, they weren't surprised when the bombardment started. They had practised retreating from their trenches into deeper underground dug-outs- when the bombardment began they sheltered in these.

  1. Haig and 'The Battle of the Somme' - source related study.

    I would say that the source is unreliable and should not have any use for a historian studying Haig and the Battle of the Somme. Source E is from a cartoon from a British magazine published in February 1917 including a small article.

  2. Windsor Coursework

    allows resident to visit the attractions 3 times a year for free. Even though tourist may feel its unfair as they have to pay the expensive cost to enter an attraction I feel it is fair as residents should benefit from something since they are living there.

  1. The Somme - source related study.

    However this information wasn't used. General Rawlinson always thought that the bombardment would do the soldier's job for them, however patrols were sent out in to no-man's land during night raid, and they reported that the German barbed wire wasn't being cut, as was planned.

  2. The Battle of the Somme

    The introduction of Pals' Battalions often led to the numbers of men in a workplace or neighbourhood being vastly reduced due to mass death during battle. Often, the intense psychological trauma manifested itself as 'shellshock', symptoms of which included twitching, deafness and/or dumbness, and severe reactions to the sound of an explosion, such as shrieking, shuddering, and moaning.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work