• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

These sources are not about Haig and the Battle of the Somme. How far do you agree hat they have no use for the historians studying Haig and the Battle of the Somme?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

History Coursework Coursework 2C Study Source D and E. These sources are not about Haig and the Battle of the Somme. How far do you agree hat they have no use for the historians studying Haig and the Battle of the Somme? Source D is useful to us as it is based on true historical events. Even though truth is exaggerated people know what events are being talked about. Source D is a picture form Black adder once popular war comedy. It is being useful as it shows different opinions about war and General Haig, who in this source is directly referred to as "Field Marshall Haig is about to.." it also gives us some historical facts like "six inches closer to the enemy" it in the funny and sarcastic way explains to us that Britain haven't gained too much land during Battle Of The Somme. ...read more.

Middle

The second source(source E) is also biased towards Haig but might be more useful as it was not written or drew to entertain as such. So when comparing those two sources we might say that the next source is more of a use to historians. Source E is a cartoon from a British magazine published in February 1917.It is again really biased like the first source we had look at towards Haig. The cartoon is not so bad as such is the writing after it which is full of biased comments towards the general. On the picture we can see a soldier looking like drawn from Haig's profile and underneath it there is a piece of text. ...read more.

Conclusion

The drawbacks on this source are that its creator seems not to like Haig and make him look stupid and unspecialised. So there also might be a bit of a truth lack showing Haig from his good side. I personally think that it is actually useful for historians to study both of those sources as they show different views about Haig. It teaches historians what people in Britain who should support the army and it's General during the times of war, had actually been saying and showing to the public. It shows historians what people felt as well as what they saw Haig as. So I don't think we can say that they are useless to historians studying Battle of the Somme. ?? ?? ?? ?? Work by: Anika Kloska 10 SG ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. General Haig - Butcher or Hero?

    There is some good evidence given here, arguing that Haig and other generals deserved more credit. But I do feel that evidence to the contrary provides a stronger argument for him and other generals deserving more credit, but he opposite side provides a strong opposition as to whether Haig deserved more credit.

  2. Case study: The Battle of the Somme.

    Many South African troops lost their lives in the six day struggle for the Deville wood.

  1. The Battle of the Somme - source related study

    I think 15.J, is a primary source, this is because the author Daniel George, was writing this on the 1st July 1916, this was the first day of the Battle of the Somme. As he is a British soldier, it is more probably, that it will be biased towards the British and the allies.

  2. Windsor Coursework

    Improvements needed according to residents This is a graph that tells us what improvements residents felt that needed to be taken. From this graph we can tell traffic, pedestrians and prices are the things residents are not happy with. Most residents are ok about the toilets and cafes.

  1. The Somme - source related study.

    Later, Lieutenant Colonel Sands saw that the Germans had the high ground on all three sides of the valley that he would attack down. He would have to march down this valley for 750 yards. He believed his men would march into disaster.

  2. Field Marshall Haig: "The butcher of the Somme?" - source related study.

    Source F is an extract from a recent book called, 'British Butchers and Bunglers of the World War'. This title contributes a great deal when trying to work out why the source is as downgrading towards Haig as it is.

  1. Haig and 'The Battle of the Somme' - source related study.

    The fact that the interview was taken years after the battle comes into play again questioning his reliability as his negative response might reflect or be influenced by the harsh criticism towards Haig at that time. Although Source C has factors that do question his reliability, I do trust it, as it is a factual account on what he experienced.

  2. Dunkirk and The Battle of Britain - Why was Britain able to win the ...

    This means that if another battle were to break out, the BEF and army would not have enough equipment and arms to fight as the enemy seized many of them. I consider this speech to be unreliable as it shows bias - Anthony Eden was British and giving a speech to the British public.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work