- Join over 1.2 million students every month
- Accelerate your learning by 29%
- Unlimited access for just £4.99 per month
To what extend do you agree with Rhodes view that the British Empire was beneficial to both Britain and the colonies?
- Essay length: 1696 words
- Submitted: 26/05/2012
-
Marked by teacher:
Natalya Luck
Teacher essay summary
This is a thorough response which demonstrates strong understanding of the historiography and engages well with it. Good use has been made of examples, although it would have been beneficial to include these in the conclusion. 5 out of 5 stars.
Marked by teacher Natalya Luck 01/10/2012
The first 200 words of this essay...
This term in history we have been learning about the British Empire and what impacts the British Empire had on the countries they conquered and on the world itself. The British Empire was the largest Empire in history and for a period of time it was the world's globally strongest countries. By 1921 the British Empire was in command of a population of about 458 million people roughly one quarter of the world's population. The land that Britain had conquered covered about a quarter of the earth's surface area (14.2 million squares miles. The legacy that is the British Empire is well known throughout the world; at the peak of its power, people often said" The sun never sets on the British Empire, "As the sun will always be shining on one of Britain's colonies all over the world." However people had many different interpretations on the empire some say they were positive some say negative. There is evidence to support Cecil's Rhodes view the empire was beneficial for both sides. However there is more persuasive evidence that the empire had negative effects. Furthermore if considering why each gave the interpretations that they did , it is obvious that Cecil's Rhodes
Found what you're looking for?
- Start learning 29% faster today
- Over 150,000 essays available
- Just £4.99 a month
Not the one? We have 100's more
Britain 1905-1951 (view all)
- How effective were the suffragists and suffragettes.
- How far did attitudes towards conscientious objectors change...
- Dunkirk Triumph or Disaster?
- Dunkirk. Source A is a modern painting by war artist Charles...
- Field Marshall Haig: 'The Butcher of the Somme?'
- Dunkirk was a triumph? How far do you agree with this statem...
- Letters from the trenches in WW1
- "War and the Transformation of British Society 1903 - 1...
- Does Douglas Haig deserve the nickame of The Butcher Of The ...
- Letter from the trenches
- What does the social welfare legislation pass between 1906 a...
- ''Without the First World War British women would not have g...
- Does General Haig deserve the title Butcher of the Somme?
- What Were the Consequences of the First World War for the Br...
- Why did the British government make use of propaganda during...
MbT essay summary
This is a thorough response which demonstrates strong understanding of the historiography and engages well with it. Good use has been made of examples, although it would have been beneficial to include these in the conclusion. 5 out of 5 stars.