• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent was Custer to blame for the defeat of the 7th Cavalry at The Battle of Little Bighorn?

Extracts from this document...


To what extent was Custer to blame for the defeat of the 7th Cavalry at The Battle of Little Bighorn? In 1876 the Army dispatched three columns to attack in coordinated fashion, one of which contained Lt. Colonel George Custer and the seventh cavalry. They planned to attack the Sioux and Cheyenne Indians who had defiantly left their reservations to gather in Montana with the great warrior Sitting Bull to fight for their lands. 'What happened to Custer and his men is not clear as there were no survivors from his force' Custer was born in New Rumley, Ohio, and spent much of his childhood with a half-sister in Monroe, Michigan. He enrolled in West Point immediately after high school and failed disgustingly to distinguish himself in any positive way. A few days after graduating last in his class, he failed in his duty as officer of the guard to stop a fight between to cadets. He was court-marshaled and saved from punishment only by a great need for officers with the outbreak of the Civil War. ...read more.


Mitch Boyer warned 'If we go in there we will never come out' but Custer was so heated in what he thought was a glorious triumphal moment that he ignored the plea of his tired men and ordered them forward, he also wanted to move quickly as he thought the Indians would try to escape, 'The largest Indian camp on the North continent is ahead and I am going to attack it'. Contemptuous of Indian military prowess, he split his forces into three parts to ensure fewer Indians would escape; he had used this method successfully at the Battle of Washita. He sent major Reno with 125 men to attack the southern end of the camp, and Captain Benteen, with 125 men, was sent to the south. Captain McDougall took charge of B company and the pack train. Custer himself took 260 men further north to cross the river to attack the Indian camp. 'Custer disobeyed orders because he did not want any other command... ...read more.


After the battle, the Indians came through and stripped the bodies and mutilated all the uniformed soldiers, believing that the soul of a mutilated body would be forced to walk the earth for all eternity and could not ascend to heaven. Inexplicably, they stripped Custer's body and cleaned it, but did not scalp or mutilate it. He had been wearing buckskins instead of a blue uniform, and some believe that the Indians thought he was not a soldier and so, thinking he was an innocent, left him alone. Because his hair was cut short for battle, others think that he did not have enough hair to allow for a very good scalping. Immediately after the battle, the myth emerged that they left him alone out of respect for his fighting ability, but few participating Indians knew who he was to have been so respectful. To this day, no one knows the real reason. Because Custer saw the battle as a 'personal triumph' rather than a 'cavalry's triumph' he was willing to take risks without thinking of the effects they might have on his troops, you could say he was selfish in his orders. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE History Projects section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

3 star(s)

Final Comment. Star rating ***
Over all this essay shows excellent knowledge and understanding of the event, but has fallen in to the trap of tellling the story of the battle rather than examining arange of factors. THe essay could have been structured around weighing up 3 key factors. For example Custer's role, the strength and skill of the Idian forces and bad luck in terms of the failure of the rest of the army.

Marked by teacher Natalya Luck 09/03/2013

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE History Projects essays

  1. Why was the Roman Army so Successful? Rome was one ...

    war, their weapons were much more vicious.The weapons included the pugio which was similar to a small dagger, used for stabbing and sometimes used as a convenience knife. The gladius was another weapon which was just sword. In the movie gladiator, the gladii were used very effectively, mostly for fluently slicing of enemies' head's while riding on their horses.

  2. To what extent can historians be objective?

    The readers' own understanding is formed by their own political, ideological or moral consciousness. Leopold Von Ranke advocated historical objectivity. His approach was to avoid applying the spirit, modes of thought, wisdom and beliefs of the present to the events of the past - this is known as historicism and

  1. why did khrushchev put missiles on cuba?

    This incident was in 1961 when newly elected President John F Kennedy broke off diplomatic relations with Cuba completely and helped some anti Castro exiles to invade Cuba and overthrow him. Kennedy provided arms, transport and equipment. In April 1961, the exiles landed on Cuba at the Bay of Pigs and were beaten by 20,000 Cuban troops.

  2. How reliable is the photograph as a historical source?

    The photographer set off in quest of this vision, travelling the East African Savanna for weeks with a captive leopard, killing antelopes, draping the carcasses in the branches of various thorn trees, cajoling the leopard to lie proudly on the 'kill', a tableau that the photographer shot against a succession of setting suns'.

  1. Was Custer to blame for the defeat at the Battle of Little Bighorn

    Mitch Bouyer told him upon arrival "If we go in there, we'll never come out". He refused to listen to this, divided his army into three columns (further weakening it)

  2. The History of Bradford. How Undercliffe Cemetery display the values of the Victorians.

    to The Behrens family, they had decided to include everybody?s name that was in their family implying that they were all buried together. This grave brings out a feature of the cemetery that supports that family values were an important element in the Victorian life.

  1. Why did King Henry V win the Battle of Agincourt?

    Striking down opponents at long range was a major advantage to Henry and the English, and therefore was the most important factor for them winning the war. This links on to the next factor, the terrain, as if it were not for the boggy conditions on the battlefield along with

  2. Was The Leadership Of Nelson Mandela The Main Reason For The Ending ...

    Source B6 is a contemporary source with its origin being Time magazine where F.W De Klerk, the former South African president states how Mandela a very significant figure within South African history, should be remembered. This source supports the view that the leadership of Nelson Mandela was the main reason why apartheid ended.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work