What interlined the effect of Germany in the 1920s was the economic depression of 1929. This hit Germany hard and it gave Hitler something to direct his oratory towards; it gave him something to counter attack, by offering things such as jobs to people and food for the starving and unemployed. He directed his oratory towards telling people what they wanted to hear.
If the economic depression had not have hit then Hitler could have been quite possibly faded out because of only have to be able to talk about the hatred of the Versailles treaty. This is a long-term cause because the economic depression gave him something to talk about so that was the immediate effect and the long-term affect was that he had something to offer the people, which was what he directed his oratory towards.
The short-term causes of Hitler’s rise to power were the decision by von Papen and Hindenburg to appoint him chancellor in 1933. He wouldn’t have been appointed chancellor if it weren’t for the long-term causes of his oratory skills because these got him far, and he gained backing in the Reichstag.
Von Papen and Hindenburg were really forced in to making the decision to make him chancellor because the previous chancellors before Hitler wasn’t getting the support they needed in the Reichstag in order to get the laws passed so they choose Hitler because of the support he had. He had the majority of the votes in the Reichstag so this enabled him to get the laws passed.
When Hitler was made chancellor he used the majority of the votes to his advantage and passed a law called the enabling law. This law would give Hitler the right to make any law he wished for the next four years without the need to consult the Reichstag. But soon after the law was passed the Reichstag was burnt down. So he didn’t have to deal with them anymore.
He would not have got this far to make the law if it wasn’t for such interlinked factors. If he had not oratory, personality and leadership skills then he would not have the qualities of a leader and possibly been easy fazed out in his first runs at becoming chancellor. Also these skills (oratory, personality and leadership) helped him when the economic depression of 1929 hit. This was because he had something else to direct his oratory too, other than the Versailles treaty; this also gave him a chance to tell the people what they wanted to hear. No economic depression, nothing fro Hitler to talk about, so this would therefore mean he would have been out of favor and then fazed out. His skills (oratory, personality and leadership) also aided him when he was made chancellor because if he weren’t made chancellor then he would not have been able to pass the enabling law with the majority of the votes in the Reichstag.
So I think that those combination of links there states that if just one of these had been absent, then he wouldn’t have been as successful as he was. If the leadership skills were absent then he would not have been able to lead Germany into the Second World War. So it is not an individual reason for his rise to power, it’s a combination of reasons.