Part of The Student Room Group

  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Was General Haig a bad leader, source based

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Assignment Part B In this essay I will analyse source C through to L to judge whether there is enough evidence to suggest that General Haig was an efficient and highly skilled soldier who lead Britain to victory during the First World War. I will look at the source provided and suggest whether there is enough evidence to suggest Keegans statement. From the collection of sources I will categorise each one into supports Keegan, neutral or oppose Keegan. I will use my own knowledge along with the sources given to back up my statements. Within the several sources I managed to find four sources that supported Keegan: Source C is a newspaper extract from the Daily Telegraph quoted by Field Marshal Haig's son on November 1998. The main purpose of this extract was to persuade and inform people that General Haig knew what he was doing and was a humane man. When Earl Haig said he never heard a criticism this could be because many people feared General Haig and therefore nobody would cross him. This source is not very reliable as it is consciously biased and is probably exaggerating as General Haig is his Father and therefore he would support and praise him. ...read more.

Middle

Out of the collection of sources I had assessed there are two other sources that were neutral in the response to Keegan's statement: Source J is a news article from the British newspaper 'The Times' published in 1917. The article is the Germans perspective of General Haig. The purpose of this source is to show that even the Germans think that General Haig was a good leader however it could as well be sarcastic as the Germans are trying to say that because of General Haig's mistakes it has benefited the German Army. It suggests that because of General Haig he is the leader that is giving Germany victory to win. Overall this source is not very reliable, as it is sarcastic so the article is not very truthful in saying that Haig had good leadership. Source K is another source that is neutral. It is an article published in a GCSE modern History review in 1998. The article is on whether Haig was totally at Fault. The purpose of this source is to educate teenagers about Haig. Other purposes would be to make money by selling the history book. ...read more.

Conclusion

The documentary shows the events that took place and explains them. The video tries to make us understand that Haig was bad at communicating and had too many ideas that he wished to accomplish however by this ambition made thousands of troops injured. Overall from the collection of sources that oppose Keegan they are generally very reliable sources however there is no evidence that agrees with Keegan's statement. In conclusion I believe that there is not enough evidence to suggest that Haig was an efficient and highly skilled soldier who did much to lead Britain to victory during the First World War. Even though there are four sources that support Keegan they are very unreliable. Also John Keegan was a military historian so we can assume he was looking at the military side of the war which was very successful. Haig needed more weaponry for his soldiers and made them more efficient so that he could accomplished the rest of the battlep. Also if he was a good commander he would of known what he was leading his men into. In addition I believe that there is not enough evidence and we can conclude that Field Marshall Douglas Haig was a failure to the Battle of Somme and he led his troops to disaster. History Coursework Nikita Patel 11S Page 1 of 3 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

or


Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. General Haig - Butcher or Hero?

    ways is fair enough, and he certainly could be viewed a 'murderer'. What happened after the war made a definite detrimental affect of his former soldiers' view of him. He returned from the war unscathed, with vast crowds cheering him as he was paraded down the streets.

  2. Was General Haig a donkey or a great commander?

    The area planned for the battle was below sea level, and apparently Haig was warned that it was only the complicated network of drainage ditches that kept it habitable. Nevertheless, Haig decided, as previously, to begin the battle with an artillery bombardment, knowing, according to Haig' critics, that this would

  1. I think Haig was a bad leader who made many critical mistakes during the ...

    The source says, "My opinion is that the generals who direct these battle do not know of the conditions, mud, cold, rain and lack of shelter for the men". This extract from source D is from a reliable primary source whose men were involved in the battle of Passchendaele.

  2. Causes of the General Strike

    decline in the competitiveness of British coal in foreign markets due to the Gold Standard led to poor relations between mine owners and mine workers. When productivity fell in the mines due to lack of modernisation and reinvestment, mine owners responded by proposing a reduction in Wages and an increase of hours.

  1. Why did the General Strike of 1926 take place?

    and the railwaymen (NUR) and, after the mine owners proposed wage cuts and extended hours to cover the loss in demand for British coal, the NUM called on these other two unions for support. Whilst they agreed in principle with the miners, they thought the miners should have tried harder to negotiate with the

  2. womens crsk history

    She also had a return ticket home, so I know that she did not intend to die, but to just stop the horse. I can also see that women would do anything to just show how much that they do want the vote.

  1. Modern history

    Helen Blackburn stated in her volume 'Women's Suffrage' that in 1837 there was 'no High Schools for girls', in addition to the fact that 'women could not enter university'. Moreover, 'women did not have any rights' whatsoever over and their 'husbands were the sole guardians of their children'.

  2. Was it his fault? These are the questions I am going to examine in ...

    The attack was set for 29th June and, for about three weeks before this; every available British gun was brought to the Front so that finally there was one gun for every seventeen yards of enemy front line. Artillery fire began 7 days before the Somme offensive.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work