• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Was General Haig a bad leader, source based

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Assignment Part B In this essay I will analyse source C through to L to judge whether there is enough evidence to suggest that General Haig was an efficient and highly skilled soldier who lead Britain to victory during the First World War. I will look at the source provided and suggest whether there is enough evidence to suggest Keegans statement. From the collection of sources I will categorise each one into supports Keegan, neutral or oppose Keegan. I will use my own knowledge along with the sources given to back up my statements. Within the several sources I managed to find four sources that supported Keegan: Source C is a newspaper extract from the Daily Telegraph quoted by Field Marshal Haig's son on November 1998. The main purpose of this extract was to persuade and inform people that General Haig knew what he was doing and was a humane man. When Earl Haig said he never heard a criticism this could be because many people feared General Haig and therefore nobody would cross him. This source is not very reliable as it is consciously biased and is probably exaggerating as General Haig is his Father and therefore he would support and praise him. ...read more.

Middle

Out of the collection of sources I had assessed there are two other sources that were neutral in the response to Keegan's statement: Source J is a news article from the British newspaper 'The Times' published in 1917. The article is the Germans perspective of General Haig. The purpose of this source is to show that even the Germans think that General Haig was a good leader however it could as well be sarcastic as the Germans are trying to say that because of General Haig's mistakes it has benefited the German Army. It suggests that because of General Haig he is the leader that is giving Germany victory to win. Overall this source is not very reliable, as it is sarcastic so the article is not very truthful in saying that Haig had good leadership. Source K is another source that is neutral. It is an article published in a GCSE modern History review in 1998. The article is on whether Haig was totally at Fault. The purpose of this source is to educate teenagers about Haig. Other purposes would be to make money by selling the history book. ...read more.

Conclusion

The documentary shows the events that took place and explains them. The video tries to make us understand that Haig was bad at communicating and had too many ideas that he wished to accomplish however by this ambition made thousands of troops injured. Overall from the collection of sources that oppose Keegan they are generally very reliable sources however there is no evidence that agrees with Keegan's statement. In conclusion I believe that there is not enough evidence to suggest that Haig was an efficient and highly skilled soldier who did much to lead Britain to victory during the First World War. Even though there are four sources that support Keegan they are very unreliable. Also John Keegan was a military historian so we can assume he was looking at the military side of the war which was very successful. Haig needed more weaponry for his soldiers and made them more efficient so that he could accomplished the rest of the battlep. Also if he was a good commander he would of known what he was leading his men into. In addition I believe that there is not enough evidence and we can conclude that Field Marshall Douglas Haig was a failure to the Battle of Somme and he led his troops to disaster. History Coursework Nikita Patel 11S Page 1 of 3 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. General Haig - Butcher or Hero?

    ways is fair enough, and he certainly could be viewed a 'murderer'. What happened after the war made a definite detrimental affect of his former soldiers' view of him. He returned from the war unscathed, with vast crowds cheering him as he was paraded down the streets.

  2. Was General Haig a donkey or a great commander?

    It was here that the terrible tales of men disappearing into shell-holes flooded with water first surfaced, although the men never did. Again, Haig's strategy seemed to be at fault, as his men drowned all around him. Yet, according to his discreditors this was not the only tactical error that he made.

  1. I think Haig was a bad leader who made many critical mistakes during the ...

    The source says, "My opinion is that the generals who direct these battle do not know of the conditions, mud, cold, rain and lack of shelter for the men". This extract from source D is from a reliable primary source whose men were involved in the battle of Passchendaele.

  2. Why did the General Strike of 1926 take place?

    and the railwaymen (NUR) and, after the mine owners proposed wage cuts and extended hours to cover the loss in demand for British coal, the NUM called on these other two unions for support. Whilst they agreed in principle with the miners, they thought the miners should have tried harder to negotiate with the

  1. Using the sources provided and your own knowledge of Haig, explain whether you think ...

    He also thought grit and determination was the way to capture machine guns. Haig's ideas were very idealistic because he had a strong faith in God and believed that He was on his side, and because of this everything would be fine.

  2. Causes of the General Strike

    This made the economic slump in Britain worse and increased unemployment. In response to this slump, the Government tried to stabilise the British economy by reintroducing the Gold Standard. Unfortunately they overestimated the value of the pound by 10%, increasing the problems of an already unstable British industry.

  1. General Haig

    This suggests that he thinks that historians now know why it had to be fought that way and people cannot judge what happened without strong evidence that they do. The message he is trying to put across is that his father did the right thing and if historians want to

  2. Was it his fault? These are the questions I am going to examine in ...

    A General must know what is happening to his troops on the battlefield, and a communication brake down between a General and his troops is always fatal. Nevertheless, you could say that if Haig's decisions were based on false information, maybe he was not entirely to blame for the implications of those decisions.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work