• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Was Haig the "Butcher of the Somme"?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

14th November 2002. Was Haig the "Butcher of the Somme"? Many people have regarded General Haig as the Butcher of the Somme. Does he really reserve this name? To decide this it is necessary to consider what happened at the battle of the Somme and to what extent it can be blamed on Haig. The Battle of the Somme was intended to relieve pressure on the French at Verdun. The commander of the British troops at the time of the Battle of the Somme was field Marshall Haig. He thought that the battle would be easy to win. Haig had a very shallow opinion of the German's. He thought that they were useless "black" people and that they didn't know how to fight shat his army would surly win. ...read more.

Middle

The great battle began on the 1st July, after week of heavy bombardment. The battle caused a lot of suffering and pain to many people. Germans had been warned that England were going to attack because it states in source 5, "Several large mines were placed under German positions. One was blown up ten minutes before Zero hour which warned the Germans to expect an attack." Haig's theory was very well thought out but he did not think about the procedures carefully enough. The theory did not work as well as it could have. Haig did want to cut the wire, which would have meant giving out an earlier warning to cut it. ...read more.

Conclusion

The plan did not work because Haig did not know about the enemy and the enemy lines, He did not know about the opposition and their tactics and plans. He also did not realise how the Germans would hide or what their trenches would be like. Haig had no idea. The artillery that had been designed was hidden by the masses of cloud so that the pilot could not see anything below. Some people have called Haig "the butcher of the Somme" In my opinion I feel he does not deserve this because he tried his best to work at keeping everything under control and making his plan work to the best it could. Even thought many people died he tried to save the millions left at home. Haig showed how he determined he was to keep on going and keep his head up. He was NOT the "butcher of the war." ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. General Haig - Butcher or Hero?

    Haig shows insight into the peace keeping process. Sources 9 and 10 are also refuted. They claim that Haig does not care for the lives of his men (e.g. "he did for them both with his plan of attack"). Source 13 shows that Haig feels that peace was necessary, and

  2. Does Haig Deserve To Be Called The Butcher Of The Somme?

    he himself was having, which was more like the life of a monarch. He was also rather careless, in that he never double checked that a general was giving him the correct information, if a general said that the wire was cut, then as far as he was concerned, it was.

  1. Haig butcher of the Somme?

    He further goes on to say, 'Haig was the product of his time', for he had 'previous military experience', and was tremendously qualified for being the General. Although this is a secondary source, meaning it wasn't taken directly from the era.

  2. Field Marshall Haig: 'The Butcher of the Somme?'

    I find there is no reason for him to lie about the war, where as Haig if unaware of the reality of the front line and he wants to be seen as a strong leader, so therefore his opinion may be bias.

  1. Haig: Butcher or Serious Commander?

    Sources F, G and H all relate to the effectiveness of the BEF on the first day of the Somme, July 1 1916. Source F is taken from General Ludendorff's war memoirs. Although, on first inspection, seems to be rather complimentary to the opposing army, it can't necessarily be taken at face value.

  2. Does Field Marshal Haig Deserve To Be Called The Butcher of the Somme?

    Once again Haig was trying to achieve the impossible. If you double the amount of land you are covering, you need to double the amount of men you are using. It was Haig's job to check every decision his generals made, and if Haig thought that Rawlinson had made a mistake with the plan he should have taken him

  1. Field Marshall Haig: "The butcher of the Somme?" - source related study.

    Most people would sit and wonder why Haig called it a "...very successful attack..." But if people sit and study the facts, some would realize that this was the only thing he could do. There were high expectations of Haig, he was under a lot of pressure from the Government,

  2. Field Marshall Haig:The Butcher of the Somme?

    My reasons for this are that a soldier at the scene of action wrote Source C. He must have been a witness to the incident because he was a private so he must have been in the action or at least watching it.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work