• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Was Haig the "Butcher of the Somme"?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

14th November 2002. Was Haig the "Butcher of the Somme"? Many people have regarded General Haig as the Butcher of the Somme. Does he really reserve this name? To decide this it is necessary to consider what happened at the battle of the Somme and to what extent it can be blamed on Haig. The Battle of the Somme was intended to relieve pressure on the French at Verdun. The commander of the British troops at the time of the Battle of the Somme was field Marshall Haig. He thought that the battle would be easy to win. Haig had a very shallow opinion of the German's. He thought that they were useless "black" people and that they didn't know how to fight shat his army would surly win. ...read more.

Middle

The great battle began on the 1st July, after week of heavy bombardment. The battle caused a lot of suffering and pain to many people. Germans had been warned that England were going to attack because it states in source 5, "Several large mines were placed under German positions. One was blown up ten minutes before Zero hour which warned the Germans to expect an attack." Haig's theory was very well thought out but he did not think about the procedures carefully enough. The theory did not work as well as it could have. Haig did want to cut the wire, which would have meant giving out an earlier warning to cut it. ...read more.

Conclusion

The plan did not work because Haig did not know about the enemy and the enemy lines, He did not know about the opposition and their tactics and plans. He also did not realise how the Germans would hide or what their trenches would be like. Haig had no idea. The artillery that had been designed was hidden by the masses of cloud so that the pilot could not see anything below. Some people have called Haig "the butcher of the Somme" In my opinion I feel he does not deserve this because he tried his best to work at keeping everything under control and making his plan work to the best it could. Even thought many people died he tried to save the millions left at home. Haig showed how he determined he was to keep on going and keep his head up. He was NOT the "butcher of the war." ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. General Haig - Butcher or Hero?

    Haig shows insight into the peace keeping process. Sources 9 and 10 are also refuted. They claim that Haig does not care for the lives of his men (e.g. "he did for them both with his plan of attack"). Source 13 shows that Haig feels that peace was necessary, and

  2. Was Field Marshall Haig the Butcher of the Somme

    so reported back to Haig that it had been cut and all was fine, whereas in actual fact it hadn't and was in even more of a mess than when they had started. This was clearly not Haig's fault, but many troops actually did their job and when they reported

  1. Field Marshall Haig: 'The Butcher of the Somme?'

    world wars, briefly tells us that it was Haig's leadership which won the war. Like in Source G, source H also comments on 'Germany's spirit of resistance was broken' which goes on to say 'mainly by the courage and resolution of Haig's armies, which had complete confidence in the leadership of their Commander'.

  2. Field Marshall Haig "The butcher of the Somme"? - source related study

    on that day but he cares more about his status in the army. Haig claims that the Germans were surrendering freely but we don't know weather this is true or not. Haig might have said this just to imply that his plan was going to plan.

  1. Source based work on Field Marshall Haig: 'The Butcher of the Somme'?

    You would expect source G to be fill with bais against the allies as it from the German Official History of WW1 but it does not seem too be, it even seems to be mildly praising the allied attacks, "Thier armies had accomplished an achievement that gave good promise for

  2. Does Field Marshal Haig Deserve To Be Called The Butcher of the Somme?

    So therefore, according to Trevor Wilson, Haig was to blame for the failings on the Western Front due to him not devising a good enough plan and allowing Rawlinson to carry on with a plan that he didn't think was going to work.

  1. Haig butcher of the Somme?

    It was shown in the 90's, so the interpretation that Haig was a butcher would have been passed down to many generations and told many times. Therefore this source isn't so much reliable, because not only do they ridicule the war generals but by doing so they take the solemnity

  2. Field Marshall Haig - 'the butcher of the Somme'?

    Of these 2 sources, I trust source C more because the author of the source, Private George Coppard was at the frontline. In source B, using my own knowledge, I know that Haig was receiving information from the frontline 40 miles ahead of him.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work