• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Was Prohibition Bound To Fail?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Was Prohibition Bound To Fail? a) The two accounts consider Prohibition from different viewpoints. They offer slightly different reasons as to why Prohibition was introduced although the intentions are the same. They also agree on the outcome of it's implementation. Source A, taken from an American History book published in 1973 discusses the differing reasons why Prohibition was considered to be a good idea, It mentions "the bad influence of saloons." Source B, taken from a different American History book published in 1979, agrees with Source A. It is more detailed in that it mentions a crusade by the "Women's Christian Temperance Union" against "one of the great evils of the times - alcoholism." The two sources also agree when mentioning the conservation of grain. The First World War was in progress and many people felt that food for the population should come before alcohol. Source A mentions this specifically, referring to "the wartime concern for preserving grain for food." Source B makes a more oblique reference to the 1917 "nation-wide campaign, led by the Anti-Saloon League." This campaign was organised to make congress "ban the use of grain for either distilling or brewing." Source A also briefly mentions the Anti-Saloon League influencing this decision. The two sources do not directly agree on the outcome of Prohibition's introduction, although they infer that the result was the same. ...read more.

Middle

Rockerfeller describes supply and demand with a regard to illegal substances saying "a vast army of lawbreakers has appeared." This speech shows that this need has no class boundories in that "many of our best citizens have openly ignored Prohibition." The law was proven to be unpopular across the entire population, Rockerfeller recognised this "respect for the law has been greatly lessened." He was able to see the result of its iintorduction when he mentions that "crime has increased to a level never seen before." Therefore, Source E, depicts a well balanced piece of evidence. Rockerfeller's views may not have been dissimilar to Kramer's but he was able to look at Prohibition and the result of its introduction far more objectively. d) Sources G and H prove that Prohibition was not successful. There are underlying reasons other than alcohol which explain some of the figures shown however it can be seen that generally the offences discussed increased. Arguments against these sources being a reliable way to see if Prohibiton was a success are that the years shown in both charts are not the same. Figures are missiong for the intervening years. Source H, statistics published by the 'City of Philadelphia Police Department' represent "arrests for drinking-related offences." However these figures are for one state only and cannot be considered to be a fair representation of what was happening across America as a whole. ...read more.

Conclusion

John D. Rockerfeller, who was well known in America, described the effect of alcohol to be 'evil' - a very strong word. John F. Kramer expressed an emphatic intention to enforce the law. All of the above have a zealous feel to their views of Prohibition. The support of the law by these groups in the Resources gives the reader the impression that they were "do-gooders" who thought they knew what was best for those considered too ignorant to make an informed decision for themselves. They were unable to see that this would be resented by the general populace and that telling someone what they should not do was going to be rebelled against and inevitably would fail. The statistical resources support the view that Prohibition would fail as they, on the whole, show that despite the amount of alcohol being taken off the market people were still drinking. The people were, therefore, not respecting this law. Cartoons were intended to appeal and be understood by all walks of life and support the view that the law would not work as everyone was involved in breaking it. The first hand account by the Policeman shows the hoplessness of the situation as he makes no real effort to "stick to his guns" and support the law but goes along with the majority, turning a 'blind-eye' to the law. All the resources in their own way support each other to show that from all aspects it was inevitable that Prohibition would fail. Li-An Wright ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE USA 1919-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE USA 1919-1941 essays

  1. Prohibition bound to fail?

    Source D has a clearer message this is probably due to the fact that by 1915 support for prohibition had grown and more people had become aware of the dangers of alcohol. Both posters show a hatred of alcohol and both artists are for prohibition.

  2. Why did prohibition fail? - Gangsters, Widespread illegal drinking, lack of support, impossibility of ...

    The majority of the country enjoyed drinking and did not wish to be told what to do by the government, so were determined not to give up what they enjoyed - alcohol. There was a public demand for alcohol, so many people took up the opportunity to supply this growing demand and many 'ordinary' US citizens were turned into lawbreakers.

  1. Why did prohibition fail?

    It has been estimated that in 1929, Al Capone's income from the various aspects of his business was $60,000,000 (illegal alcohol), $25,000,000 (gambling establishments), $10,000,000 (vice) and $10,000,000 from various other 'rackets', although no-one was ever sure exactly how

  2. History - Prohibition

    Source J was written by a policeman in Chicago in the 1920s. It supports source I and shows that it was almost impossible to refuse a bribe. The fact that this policeman worked in Chicago depicts how hard it was to refuse a bribe.

  1. The USA: Was prohibition bound to fail?

    Therefore, Source F is very unreliable about the effectiveness, reasons, and background on prohibition. Nevertheless, it is a fairly good source to suggest that prohibition officials believed that the law would be successful, and it shows that law enforcement agencies intended to enforce the law, even if they failed. d)

  2. How far do these two accounts agree about prohibition?

    a biased view when he wrote his account because he was the first prohibition commissioner. Source E also shows a lot more information as Rockfeller talks about what happened as well as what he wanted to happen. Rockfeller also had the benefit of hindsight and therefore I think he wrote a more accurate account of the events of that time.

  1. Why Was Prohibition Attempted and Why Did It Fail?

    The New York World made the point that prohibition only served to increase vice and crime in the streets of America, rather than reducing it. One mocking poem metaphorically illustrated the weakness of the Wickersham Commission (the government-appointed commission

  2. How far do these two accounts agree about Prohibition?

    This source tells us that while the man uses his weekly wages for a drink his family stay hungry. Source D shows a little boy and girl standing outside a saloon waiting for their father. The slogan underneath says, " Daddy's in there, and our clothes and shoes and food are in there too and they'll never come out".

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work