• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Was the impact of World War I on Russia the main reason why the rule of the Tsar collapsed in 1917?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Was the impact of World War I on Russia the main reason why the rule of the Tsar collapsed in 1917? On the 15th of March 1917, the Tsar of Russia was advised to abdicate by his officials, during the third year of war. This was due to the enormous discontent with the economy, and workers began to strike. It was only when the army joined the strikers, when the Tsar realised that he had lost control. The army had refused to fire on their fellow citizens, and instead marched with them to demand a new government. Since the rule of the Tsar had depended on support from the military, the Tsar's generals advised the Tsar to abdicate. Although Nicholas tried to give the throne to his brother, and then his son, he could not and so he eventually abdicated. He was arrested within a week, and after a few months, he was assassinated. The tsar had faced other challenges to his authority before, but survived the major rebellion in 1905, and so seemed secure. Because of this apparent security, historians believe the war to have been the major cause of his having to abdicate. There were other problems before the war however, which led people to question the Tsar's rule. In Russia at that time, the workers were treated very poorly, had very poor conditions in both the town and countryside, but they even had no political rights. ...read more.

Middle

The Tsar was popular at this point in time, but then a chain of events occurred which greatly altered his popularity. The Russian army was unready for war; they had few supplies, little ammunition and weapons, and a shortage of medical supplies and food. The leadership structure of the army was also weak, since officials were only chosen for their social status, and not for their ability to lead. This resulted in a massive defeat in battle. Whole armies were destroyed at the battles of Tannenburg and the Masurian Lakes, although the Russians had expected to win. Quarter of a million soldiers were wounded or taken prisoner in six weeks, and by 1915, three million soldiers were lost. The tsar's support quickly faded in wake of the immense military defeats, although he could not directly be blamed for the defeats until he took charge of the army in August 1915. This decision was quickly proved to be fatal: the Tsar thought he could make his soldiers win because he was chosen to rule by God's divine right. He had little military experience, and this coupled with the fact that he now had direct responsibility for his troops meant that he could be blamed for all defeats. As well as that, the unpopular Tsarina had been left in charge of the country, at Petrograd. She was suspected of being a German spy, and of betraying the army, causing the defeats. ...read more.

Conclusion

There had been 7 million war casualties, raw materials were not reaching the factious, and the unemployment rate was expanding. The final push needed for the tsar to have to abdicate was the March revolution. Workers were striking at the Putilov engine works because they wanted higher wages. The strike spread quickly, and the strikers often clashed with the army. 90,000 marched for cheaper bread at this point. The tsar was warned of the breakdown of law and order, but he ignored the warnings, and stopped the Duma from meeting. The final event was on the 12th march, because the army did not fire on the strikers on that date, but joined them. Instead the army and police joined the General Strike that had been called. They marched together to demand a new government. The tsar realised how serious events were, and tried to return to Petrograd. However his train was stopped outside the city. The generals warned him of how serious matters had become, and advised him to abdicate which he duly did on the 15th March. I conclude that although Nicholas had made many mistakes before the war, the mishandling of the war was the final catalyst that led to his abdication. If he had not mishandled the war so badly, he would not have lost the support of the army. The army's support in previous crises ensured his survival then, but once he had lost their support, he was powerless to act. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. "To what extent was World War One the main reason for the downfall of ...

    The Russian economy was another long-term problem contributing to the Russian revolution. Industry was a failure as there were large numbers of poor landless peasants who worked long hours with low wages living in appalling conditions. Karl Marx wrote in 'The Communist Manifesto' in 1848: "they have nothing to lose but their chains."

  2. Why did the Tsar fall from powerIn March 1917 ? I believe the ...

    On August 1st 1914 Germany declared war on Russia. The Russian army was no where near equipped to cope with a modern war. In order to improve the situation the Tsar left to join the troops on the front line and left his wife the Tsarina to run the country, which didn't go down well with the Russian citizens.

  1. How and why did the Bolsheviks seize power in 1917?

    Industry had come to a standstill. The Duma set up a Provisional Committee to take over government but the Tsar ordered them to disband, to which they firmly refused. On 12th March the Tsar ordered his army to put down the revolt by force, and they firmly refused.

  2. Russia's involvement in WW1 was the main reason for the March 1917 revolution - ...

    He never received the education he needed to be a good leader and made many wrong decisions. He was disliked by many people as well as the Mensheviks and the Bolsheviks which included city workers and students. The Mensheviks were led by Martoz and the Bolsheviks were led by Lenin.

  1. Why did the Tsar abdicate after the 1917 revolution

    this was WW1 it was never going to be over in just 6 months. The First World War had much more blood shed then the Russo-Japanese war and it lasted a lot longer. Also the conditions were awful in WW1 and there were little supplies of everything.

  2. Russia 1914 To 1917: Coursework : Sources Question

    What we can also see centred in the room is a priest, giving his blessings to the soldiers, yet again demonstrating religion to be an important part of the war.

  1. Why does the Tsar abdicate in 1917?

    The most important question over land had never been settled. To the peasants, it seemed nothing was given. Although they owned 90 % of land on the eve of the revolution, it was the 10% that stayed in people's minds.

  2. How far was military defeat responsible for the fall (abdication) of the Tsar in ...

    Although in the half century following emancipation the peasant lived miserable, unsuccessful lives, there were no serious peasant disturbances until around 1900 when there were widespread riots. The workers had similar problems when the industrialisation of Russia in the late nineteenth century meant that they were working longer hours, in

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work