• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9
  10. 10
    10

Was the league a success?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Was the league a success? The league of nations was formed because of the horrors of the world war. Video's and camera's had just been invented, and these enabled people to see what soldiers must endure. This falsified the primitive idea that going to war is honourable. This concept is perfectly explained by a poem called "Dulce et decorum est", by Wilfred Owen. Now that people across the globe knew this terrible truth, they did not want anything similar to this to happen again. This is what prompted the creation of an international peace-keeping organisation. Only one nation had the financial and military resources to actually create such an organisation, the United States of America. Its president Mr Woodrow Wilson, had founded this organisation which was to be named, the "League of nations". The League of Nations as formed as part of the ratification of a treaty. This treaty was known as the "Treaty of Versailles". All of this happened after the war. The attitudes of the main nations who made the treaty of Versailles, is accurately portrayed in the picture source below. I have included some notes in textboxes that are below the source, to help explain it. ...read more.

Middle

Countries were allowed to keep just enough weapons to defend themselves. How would you decide whether a country had enough weapons to defend itself? The league had no way of forcing countries to disarm or checking that they had disarmed. Force: An attack on a member state would be seen as an attack on all member states. The league had no army, so al countries would help if a country would attack. First they would impose a sanction, if this failed, they would supply soldiers for a joint war. This assumed that governments would risk the money and lives of their own people to sort out a quarrel between two other countries. A huge weakness of the league Many Americans felt the Treaty of Versailles was too harsh and did not want to support the League of Nations as it was linked to the Treaty. There was a strong tradiotion in "isolationism" in the USA. Many had thguth that Usa should not get involved in European affairs. They did nt want to waste their money and military resources on people that were half way across the wolrd, and already had a large debt to pay the ameriican's. The source below shows America leaving the league. ...read more.

Conclusion

In 1928 the Kellogg-Brand Pact consisted of 65 nations agreeing not to use force to settle disputes. The League solved many disputes such as: > The Aaland Islands (1921) > Upper Silesia (1921) > Memel (1923) > Turkey (1923) > Greece and Bulgaria (1925) Failures The French occupation of the Ruhr The league was supposed to STOP aggression and invasions. The French was also one of the permanent members of the league, but the league still didn't have any influence on it. Basically, France supplied the main military resources, without France, the League couldn't do even less. The league was powerless to stop France. Many people thought that the League had no backbone, and that France was hypocritical. The league was unable to solve many disputes such as: > Teschen (1919) > Vilna (1920) > War between Russia and Poland (1920 to 1921) > The invasion of the Ruhr (1923) > Italy and Albania (1923) Generally, the League on the whole was a failure, but it did have one huge success that I have not listed. This success was not one of it's aims. The failures of the league, told the world what the flaws were in thi peace-keeping organisation, and another organisation was formed rectifying these mistakes. It's still around today, and is what has kept me from ever seeing war. The United Nations. Antony Thambiah ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. "Was the treaty of Versailles fair?"

    Do you agree or disagree with this statement? * = these questions require to know all the terms of Versailles. If you purely concentrate on what is stated in the set question (be it reparations, war guilt etc) you will limit the credit you will ESSAY BANK: How did the Germans react to the Treaty of Versailles and why?

  2. How successful was the League of Nations in the 1920s.

    This is vital as child labour was common in many countries. The International Labour Organisation also campaigned generally for better working conditions for all workers. A resolution was introduced for a maximum forty-eight hour week, and an eight-hour day, but only a minority of members adopted it because they thought it would raise industrial costs.

  1. ATHENS & THE DELIAN LEAGUE

    A fair conclusion at this point would be that the Athens treatment of her allies has reached a new level or inequality, going against the league's original intentions. But it could be equally suggested that Athens had methods of gaining total power over the allies that were under her control.

  2. The Success Of Blitzkrieg II.

    On May 18th 1940 Gamelan was sacked and replaced by Leyland who himself was 73 years old, and so you could almost say that the French made their own defeat because they sacked a person who had old fashioned methods of warfare and replaced him with someone who had even older methods of warfare.

  1. Was the League of Nations a Success in the 1920's?

    The problem was that Sweden and Finland both wanted control of the island. The League of Nations decided to give the island to Finland and Sweden agreed. This decision made by the League was a good one because it avoided one of the Leagues worst worries, war.

  2. The failures of Gallipoli

    took place in Egypt on sandy deserts, while they were going to land on rocky hills and had no training in trench warfare. The tactics used were also bad, showing the poor command, because they always used the same tactic.

  1. In what ways and with what success did successive British Governments seek to promote ...

    Another aim of the negotiations was to try and establish harmony throughout Europe. Lloyd George feared that if Russia was treated as an outcast she might ally with Germany. Such an alliance might well threaten Europe's peace and stability. In March 1921 the Anglo-Soviet trade agreement was signed under which both sides agreed to refrain form hostile propaganda.

  2. The League of Nations: Its achievements and its failures

    to keep good relations with Mussolini, who seemed to be their strongest ally against Hitler. They signed an agreement with him in 1935, the Stresa Pact, which formalized a protest at German rearmament and a commitment to stand united against Germany.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work