• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Was the treaty of Versailles fair?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐Was the treaty of Versailles fair? The Treaty of Versailles was the peace settlement signed after World War One had ended in 1918 and in the shadow of the Russian and other events in Russia. The treaty was signed at the vast Versailles Palace near Paris - hence its title - between Germany and the Allies. World War one ended at 11am on 11th November 1918. In 1919, Lloyd George of England, Orlando of Italy, Clemenceau of France and Woodrow Wilson from the US met to discuss how Germany was to be made to pay for the damage world war one had caused. There were a total of 440 clauses in the final treaty. The first 26 clauses dealt with the establishment of the League of Nations. ...read more.

Middle

It was bitterly resented, however, by virtually all Germans who did not believe they were responsible for the outbreak of the war. This article was a constant thorn in the side of the Weimar leaders who tried to meet the terms of the agreement while trying to have these terms modified. How Was Germany Punished At Versailles? Germany was punished severely by the Treaty of Versailles, and in many cases, some of the terms seemed greatly unfair towards Germany. The treaty was put together by Woodrow Wilson who wasn?t very keen on punishing Germany too harshly, as he believed that Germany would be intent on seeking revenge in the future, Georges Clemenceau who wanted to punish Germany for Frances losses, and David Lloyd George Who himself wanted a fair settlement, but also wanted to please the British Public, who were demanding that Germany would be punished for Britain?s losses. ...read more.

Conclusion

Only voluntary soldiers could join, conscription was banned. The navy was only allowed 6 battleships, and Germany wasn?t allowed to build any submarines, planes, and tanks. They were also banned from keeping any troops in the Rhineland, and it was agreed that Allied troops would be stationed there for 15 years. German soldiers and sailors weren?t very happy about this; they had wanted to rebuild their forces. In conclusion, the treaty of Versailles was an unfair treaty to Germany who could not pay the harsh consequences. Perhaps if the big three had been more sympathetic and realistic to Germany, there may have been different outcomes. The Treaty of Versailles was supposed to ensure a lasting peace by punishing Germany and setting up a League of Nations to solve diplomatic problems. Instead it left a legacy of political and geographical difficulties which have often been blamed, sometime solely, for starting the Second World War. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. How fair was the treaty of versaiiles

    Eupen and Malmedy were awarded to Belgium. This is also a fair point as Germany after losing the war was going to lose land. It has also gone to a country which was affected by the war when Germany travelled through Belgium to get to France.

  2. "Was the treaty of Versailles fair?"

    It is obviously the winning side were biased and they only wanted to take advantage of the losers and the resources available in their countries. The seeds of Hitler's rise to power were planted following the outcome of the First World War.

  1. How fair was the treaty of Versailles?

    The coal-rich district of Saarland was also occupied by French troops. France wanted to have Saarland within its own border but neither Wilson nor George was prepared to give Saarland to France. Eventually they compromised and were given to the League of Nations but can be occupied by France.

  2. Who was most pleased with the Treaty of Versailles. Woodrow Wilson or George Clemenceau?

    Also, the winning powers were given the 'mandates' to look after on behalf of the League.

  1. how fair was the treaty of versailles

    North Schleswig was voted to return to Denmark. This again is a fair point as it was once a part of Denmark and in returning to Denmark it agrees with Wilson's point of self determination. It is land which was lost in 1863 and has been fairly returned to Denmark by voting.

  2. Analyse the Strengths and Weaknesses of the Versailles Settlement.

    Land and industry taken away to such an extent, for example in The Saar, meaning the means of financing the repayments to be met were impossible. Economic absurdity of Weimar's overprints of banknotes caused massive inflation. Jeremy Fazli, amongst others, notes the unequal distribution of population not just as upset

  1. To what extent was The Treaty of Versailles fair, and what were the consequences ...

    Every one of the three leaders got some of the things that they wanted, so they could all feel that they had achieved something. Clemenceau (France) got Reparations from Germany to pay for the cost of the damage caused during the war.

  2. Treaty of Versailles, was it fair?

    In addition to that they received what they thought harsh demands from the Allies where they were not aloud an army more than 100,000, no U-boats neither aircrafts and only 6 battleships, not to mention the huge amounts of money they had to pay out as compensation for the damages

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work