• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Were the Heavy Allied Casualties on The Western Front Caused Mainly by the Tactics Used by Commanders?

Extracts from this document...


Were the Heavy Allied Casualties on The Western Front Caused Mainly by the Tactics Used by Commanders? World War One (1914-1918) was one of the greatest wars of all time (thus it is commonly known as the 'Great War'), the second largest War in entire human history and the largest at the time of occurrence. Because of the relatively recent introduction of the industrial period, mass weapon, transport and ships were more readily available than ever before and this provided the foundation for the war's cruel nature. This modern style created a pathway to the unprecedented casualty figures and mass destruction on such a huge scale. This form of fighting was an unknown territory for those who participated; few had any idea of how long the war would last, and most of the commanding officers were unwilling to accept that it was a different style from anything they had previously attempted to lead. ...read more.


Therefore the basis of the question is whether the central cause of Allied casualties was the choices and actions of commanders, or the multiple additional factors including trench life, modern weaponry and the newfound use of airborne military units. Because of the global spread of industrialism, mass production of weapons and ammunition, warships and alternate transport vehicles could be more easily achieved at an unparalleled rate in both the Triple Entente and the Central Powers. This meant that high quality weapons could be produced at a relatively low cost and provided for each soldier; therefore it was possible for both sides to have roughly the same amount and type of military equipment during a battle. However, this did not mean that they had equal amounts of similar military apparatus due to differing tactical approaches; for instance Edmund "The Bull" Allenby was a field marshal who believed that the use of cavalry was appropriate even against the Ottoman's machine guns when he fought in the Third Battle of Gaza. ...read more.


Machine gun operators were commonly protected from fire inside concrete 'pillboxes' (dug-in guard posts with firing loopholes). Their main disadvantage was that each gun took six to eight men to operate and they were very heavy. They had an inbuilt water cooling system; however, the guns occasionally overheated after only two minutes of firing and therefore were used in intermittent bursts rather than continuous streams of fire.*Germans appreciated the use of machine guns. However, machine guns did not in fact contribute to the casualty count of the British soldiers at a level remotely comparable with the immense damage caused by artillery. These caused on average an estimated three quarters of all combat deaths. They were used in many different ways; they could be used to fire fragmentation, gas and even incendiary shells. Fragmentation shells were designed to release as much shrapnel as possible upon impact (explosion) and incendiary shells were used to set fire to the surrounding environment. By Sam Reine-Harris ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. Describe the conditions that soldiers experienced on the Western Front in the years 1915-1917.

    There was a very big lack of hygiene in the trenches. Latrines (toilets) were pits dug into the ground, leading off the main trenches. They were about one and half metres deep. A plank of wood was used to cover the ground.

  2. History Sourcework- Field Marshal Haig Final

    myriad soldiers being killed, and the fact that the Somme was not, in his own words, "all going like clockwork", without Germans "surrendering freely". In reality, it was the British Army's worst day, with 20,000 casualties. As well as this, despite bias seeming irrelevant, it is not.

  1. Was there much change in the fighting methods employed by the British Army on ...

    After three days of fighting at Cambrai, the tanks had driven eight kilometres deep into the Hindenburg Line, and for only a fraction of the casualties. This greatly boosted British troops' moral. By 1918, the 'Mark 5' tank and the 'Medium Mark A' tank had been designed.

  2. The Western Front

    By the end of May the Allies had lost more troops at Gallipoli than the total British losses in battle during the entire South African War. A third attack (4 June) confirmed the impression that nothing short of a large army could master the position and after further losses the

  1. Why had the Western Front been established by the end of 1914?

    This meant that the six major counties had been divided into two separate alliances. I think this was significant in the road to war for it created a lot of tension between certain countries, for example, France and Germany and Britain and Germany.

  2. World War 1 - How Two Bullets Caused 20 Million Deaths

    It was this national desire to grow that led Germany to eye up the land to the East of its boarders. UK, At this point in history their British Empire was past its peak. There was a growing sense in the UK that the golden age was over and that (in the end)

  1. Was Field Marshall Douglas Haig more important that the allied blockade of German naval ...

    Southern sector, made no gains whatsoever.? The British had been blockading German ports since 1914. The blockade was supposed to strangle? German industry so that it could not supply the German army. It reduced German trade from $5.9 billion in 1914 to just $0.8 billion in 1917.

  2. How Far Did Weapons and Tactics Change Over the Period of 1914 and 1918?

    Larger guns such as the Howitzer could fire shells at enemy targets hundreds of yards away. In addition, smaller versions of field guns were also used in artillery attacks and hand held trench mortars were used by the men in the trenches.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work