• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What different tactics were used by both sides in an attempt to win the conflict in Vietnam between1956 and 1968?

Extracts from this document...


What different tactics were used by both sides in an attempt to win the conflict in Vietnam between 1956 and 1968 During the period between 1956 and 1968 both sides in the Vietnam conflict tried to use different tactics to gain an advantage over the other side to win the war. The Vietcong and NVA tended to use guerrilla tactics and the US forces and ARVN used their better technology to try and win the fighting. Throughout this war and in previous wars the Vietnamese used guerrilla tactics. In a guerrilla war they built up strength and began to attack the enemy in small groups and then disappear. They then had control of the countryside and were careful not to annoy the locals on whom they depended for food and shelter. The leaders felt that they were strong enough to attack the towns and cities. The Vietnamese were forced to use guerrilla tactics because this is the type of war they were used to fighting, they had the support of the locals and they did not have the modern weapons and equipment that they needed to fight a conventional war. If they did try to fight the US conventionally they would have easily lost. In this guerrilla war they used sneaky tactics like using booby traps and building huge tunnel systems underground. This war proved to be very effective against the US troops who were only trained in the tactics for a conventional war. ...read more.


The code of conduct for the Vietcong was strictly enforced and it told them how to treat the people. It proved to be successful because the Vietcong always found support in the villages in the countryside. During the war the US forces in Vietnam tried many tactics against the Vietcong and NVA. At the beginning of the war the US soldiers did not fight directly against North Vietnamese forces but were called military 'Advisers' and helped in training the ARVN to stop the expected invasion from the north. In 1954 the first advisers were sent by Eisenhower. there were just 17 but by 1961 the number had grown to 685. Along with the advisers economic aid and modern weapons and equipment for the army were sent. The tactic of sending the advisers failed as in time they became troops and were involved directly in the fighting but the sending of aid and weapons was successful as it helped to make sure most of South Vietnam stayed pro-western and supported the war. The Increasing problem in South Vietnam was that many local farmers supported the Vietcong and helped them to fight the guerrilla war against the Americans. The US reaction to this was to create 'Strategic hamlets' which were fortified villages to stop the Vietcong from mixing with the local population. This tactic was mostly a failure because it meant that the farmers would have to leave the land they had farmed for centuries which caused Diem's regime to become even more unpopular and as the US was associated with Diem it made them more unpopular too. ...read more.


This allowed the US to spot the Vietcong from the air and over 25 000 square Km of Rainforest was destroyed by the end of the war. Unfortunately it contained a toxin called Dioxin which contaminated the people who handled it at the airbase and the people local to where it was dropped. the effects of it were long-term. Agent Orange was successful in defoliating the tree canopy and so the natural cover for the Vietcong it had little effect on the way the war was being fought and made the war even more unpopular with the US public. Another powerful chemical weapon used to destroy areas of forest but also used as a weapon was napalm. Again it was successful in destroying the forests and villages but did very little to change the way the war would be fought because the Vietcong built tunnel systems to hide underground from the Americans. In conclusion I think that tactics used by the NVA and Vietcong were more effective than those used by the US and South Vietnamese even though the US had the advantage of high technology they failed to use it in a way that would be effective in changing the way the war was fought and would make them more popular with the people South Vietnam and the USA. Unlike the NVA and Vietcong who managed to keep the advantage over the US by using tactics that made use of their skills in guerrilla war and the terrain that they were used to fighting in. ?? ?? ?? ?? History Coursework Matthew Wells ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Vietnam 1954-1975 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Vietnam 1954-1975 essays

  1. Describe the military tactics used by both the USA and the Vietcong forces in ...

    Many innocent Vietnamese people, including children, suffered as a result and led to an increase in hate for the Americans. The tactics used by both the Vietcong and the US developed from 'soft' tactics to more aggressive approaches. The tactics used by both sides were similar at the start as

  2. What different tactics were used by both sides in an attempt to win the ...

    These were: "The enemy attacks, we retreat. The enemy camps, we raid. The enemy tires, we attack. The enemy retreats, we attack." This tactic was very successful as it made the U.S. soldiers constantly on edge. This boosted Vietcong morale as even though the Americans had superior weapons and resources; the Vietcong knew they could win the war.

  1. What different tactics were used by both sides in an attempt to win the ...

    the peasants so in 1962 they decided to move the peasants into strategic hamlets away from areas of Vietcong activity so the peasants could supply information equipment and food to the VC and the VC could not operate. If this had been a success then the USA would not have to have had as much further involvement.

  2. Methods used by the Vietcong during the Vietnam War

    do this very secretly as a surprise attack at night or when the Americans are not on high alert so that in shock the US would respond slower giving the Vietcong the advantage. The Vietcong would also attack the enemy when they are vulnerable, for example if they are tired

  1. Describe the Different Tactics used by the USA and Vietnamese in the 1960’s

    The Vietcong looked the same as everyone else they were not like the US they did not wear uniforms and so they could easily blend into the crowd of people around them. The Vietcong also used Guerrilla Warfare, which the US soldiers were not taught to counter against in military

  2. How effective were the US tactics of 'Search and Destroy' and 'Defoliation' in the ...

    Overall, even though defoliation achieved its purpose, it was at a large price due to the amount of US soldiers and civilians that were killed or injured due to exposure.

  1. I think that the four most significant themes in the Vietnam War were protest ...

    said higher American casualties and less successful battles than had been stated in the documents the government had official released. This release was resonant as it was followed by more protesters standing up against the government which proves war journalism?s short term significance.

  2. How Effective Were The Tactics Of Search And Destroy And Defoliation During The Vietnam ...

    The platoon moved through the village and shot many Men, Women and Child even if not of military nature. Many children between the ages of 3 ? 5 were also killed. Afterwards, those who returned to the village claimed that it took three days to bury the bodies.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work