• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What impression of 'Kristallnacht' does source c give? Explain your answer.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

B) Study Source C. What impression of 'Kristallnacht' does source c give? Explain your answer. From source C, I get the impression that the SS and the Stormtroopers carried out the violence of 'Kristallnacht'. I get this impression because it mentions that they had been "provided with hammers, axes and firebombs" so therefore they may have caused the destruction. I can base my opinion on this because source C is a reliable source. The source tells us that the official view from the Nazis was that 'Kristallnacht' was a spontaneous impulse created by the German public. The source goes on to tell us that the public was horrified by the anti-Jewish behaviour but they could not broadcast this feeling because "the slightest sign of sympathy for the Jews from the public for the Jews caused fury amongst the Nazi's". The author believes from viewing "the ruins and the violence", and by interviews he carried out that 'Kristallnacht' was a planned event involving SS men and Stormtroopers not in uniform. These soldiers were disguised in an attempt to fool the Nazi's that they were the German public. And that it was planned because "no attempts were made to put out fires". Many Jews also were sent to concentration camps "The most hideous part of the so-called 'spontaneous' action was the arrest and transportation to concentration camps of male German Jews". C) Study Sources C, D and E. Do sources D and E make it more, or less likely, that the account given in source C is accurate? I think that source D and E does support what is said in Source C because there are certain factors in each that agree with source C. ...read more.

Middle

This is important as these are two very different cultures and different cultures do not always interpret the same things correctly. Also, source F shows the Nazi's looting of the Jews possessions and source G is trying to get the point across that the German public is defenceless. I know this because in source G, the German citizen who is tied up and gagged is the focus of the cartoon and the Nazi officer and dead Jew are in the background. I think that the two sources are fairly similar because they are both trying to get the point across that the Nazis are responsible for 'Kristallnacht' and this is the focus of agreement for both sources. E) Study Sources H and I. How far does source I prove that Goering was telling the truth in source H? Source I proves that Goering was telling the truth in source H to a certain extent. Source H blames Goebbels for 'Kristallnacht' "it was not acceptable to me that he should upset my difficult economic tasks by destroying so much Jewish property of economic value and by causing so many disturbances in economic life". This suggests Goering's anger at Goebbels for wasting so much. It also tells us that Hitler apologised on Goebbels behalf. The reliability though is questionable because if it were Goering organising 'Kristallnacht', he would have wanted to push the blame on someone else at the time because he was on trial for war crimes. Source I tells us that Hitler disapproved with 'Kristallnacht', and that he was definitely not pleased with the person who organised it as he wanted to come with an understanding with France and that wouldn't happen after the events of 'Kristallnacht'. ...read more.

Conclusion

Source I tells us that Hitler disapproved with 'Kristallnacht', and that he was definitely not pleased with the person who organised it. Hitler never wanted it to happen. This source is fairly reliable because there is nothing to suggest that it lies. However, a factor of unreliability is that it is reported over 30 years later by Frau Troost in an interview. This suggests that she may have had a lapsed memory. I have learned that Frau Troost was a close friend of Hitler's and in theory, as a close friend, she would deny anything with Hitler being involved in Kristallnacht to try and defend him. I believe that this source indicates that neither the German people nor the Nazi party was involved with 'Kristallnacht'. In conclusion, I think that 'Kristallnacht' was not a 'spontaneous event by the German people'. This is because only three out of the nine sources supports this claim and the evidence that backs it up is misleading, confusing and from unreliable origins. There is far more evidence in the sources that Goebbels organised 'Kristallnacht' with the SS and the SA in order to impress Hitler who he was out of favour with. However, Source A, Source G and Source I clearly show that Hitler did not approve of it "he agreed that such events must not be allowed to take place". I have also learnt that Hitler didn't discourage Kristallnacht once it had taken place "Hitler squealed with delight and slapped his leg with enthusiasm", and in Source B "such demonstrations were not to be organised by the party, but neither were they discouraged". Therefore, I think that the statement 'Kristallnacht was a spontaneous event by the German people' is untrue and the vast majority of the sources do not support this claim. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Germany 1918-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Germany 1918-1939 essays

  1. The Italian Conquest of Abyssinia: How far was the LoN to blame?

    was hard to deal with as the league's (woman's) hands are tied. Source B is also critical of the League of Nations in a couple of ways. For starters, the league here is represented as a cart. The fact that this is the case shows how the league was slow and needed to be pushed to keep it going.

  2. Source Investigation: Why did Kristallnacht take place?

    This completely contradicts Source C, which plainly states that 'all of the local crowds were obviously horrified by the Nazis' acts'. Thus, it leads us to question whether the account in Source C is wholly accurate, in labelling the Nazis as being entirely to blame for the mass slaughter of the Jews.

  1. Kristallnacht was a spontaneous even by the German people. How far do these ...

    The Nazi officer is shown as being very aggressive and barbaric causing destruction in the background. The cartoon is telling us that the Nazi party were completely behind the attack on Kristallnacht and how the German people were desperate to help but were being forced into keeping quite and not putting blame upon the Nazi's.

  2. What was the main cause of Kristallnacht?

    Source E blames the Nazis because it says "most German people have nothing to do with these riots and burnings and the police supplied the SA men with [weapons]." It also adds that it was planned saying "a list of names and addresses" were given.

  1. GCSE History Coursework: Reichstag Fire 1) ...

    excuse to take emergency powers and lock up or kill the Communists. Van der Lubbe was used by the Nazis. Which interpretation is best supported by the evidence in these sources and your knowledge of the period? Source A suggests that statement i)

  2. Why Did Kristallnacht Take Place?

    Source E must be a reliable source to back up Source C as it is seemingly from a civil servant, working in a day-to-day job with political administrators. Source D also talks about the horrors leading up to Kristallnacht, although not in as much detail as in Sources C and E.

  1. Why did Kristallnacht take place? Source based work.

    I think that source D and E does support what is said in Source C because there are certain factors in each that agree with source C. Source C tells us that the official view of the Nazis was that Kristallnacht was "a spontaneous wave of anger" by the German

  2. Holocaust - Source related questions.

    They were angry about the treatment of Jews and were actively involved in bringing about even sinister conditions for the Jews. Sources D and E tell us that although most people did not support the Nazi treatment of Jews, they were not willing to show objection either, they were passively involved.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work