• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What impression of 'Kristallnacht' does source c give? Explain your answer.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

B) Study Source C. What impression of 'Kristallnacht' does source c give? Explain your answer. From source C, I get the impression that the SS and the Stormtroopers carried out the violence of 'Kristallnacht'. I get this impression because it mentions that they had been "provided with hammers, axes and firebombs" so therefore they may have caused the destruction. I can base my opinion on this because source C is a reliable source. The source tells us that the official view from the Nazis was that 'Kristallnacht' was a spontaneous impulse created by the German public. The source goes on to tell us that the public was horrified by the anti-Jewish behaviour but they could not broadcast this feeling because "the slightest sign of sympathy for the Jews from the public for the Jews caused fury amongst the Nazi's". The author believes from viewing "the ruins and the violence", and by interviews he carried out that 'Kristallnacht' was a planned event involving SS men and Stormtroopers not in uniform. These soldiers were disguised in an attempt to fool the Nazi's that they were the German public. And that it was planned because "no attempts were made to put out fires". Many Jews also were sent to concentration camps "The most hideous part of the so-called 'spontaneous' action was the arrest and transportation to concentration camps of male German Jews". C) Study Sources C, D and E. Do sources D and E make it more, or less likely, that the account given in source C is accurate? I think that source D and E does support what is said in Source C because there are certain factors in each that agree with source C. ...read more.

Middle

This is important as these are two very different cultures and different cultures do not always interpret the same things correctly. Also, source F shows the Nazi's looting of the Jews possessions and source G is trying to get the point across that the German public is defenceless. I know this because in source G, the German citizen who is tied up and gagged is the focus of the cartoon and the Nazi officer and dead Jew are in the background. I think that the two sources are fairly similar because they are both trying to get the point across that the Nazis are responsible for 'Kristallnacht' and this is the focus of agreement for both sources. E) Study Sources H and I. How far does source I prove that Goering was telling the truth in source H? Source I proves that Goering was telling the truth in source H to a certain extent. Source H blames Goebbels for 'Kristallnacht' "it was not acceptable to me that he should upset my difficult economic tasks by destroying so much Jewish property of economic value and by causing so many disturbances in economic life". This suggests Goering's anger at Goebbels for wasting so much. It also tells us that Hitler apologised on Goebbels behalf. The reliability though is questionable because if it were Goering organising 'Kristallnacht', he would have wanted to push the blame on someone else at the time because he was on trial for war crimes. Source I tells us that Hitler disapproved with 'Kristallnacht', and that he was definitely not pleased with the person who organised it as he wanted to come with an understanding with France and that wouldn't happen after the events of 'Kristallnacht'. ...read more.

Conclusion

Source I tells us that Hitler disapproved with 'Kristallnacht', and that he was definitely not pleased with the person who organised it. Hitler never wanted it to happen. This source is fairly reliable because there is nothing to suggest that it lies. However, a factor of unreliability is that it is reported over 30 years later by Frau Troost in an interview. This suggests that she may have had a lapsed memory. I have learned that Frau Troost was a close friend of Hitler's and in theory, as a close friend, she would deny anything with Hitler being involved in Kristallnacht to try and defend him. I believe that this source indicates that neither the German people nor the Nazi party was involved with 'Kristallnacht'. In conclusion, I think that 'Kristallnacht' was not a 'spontaneous event by the German people'. This is because only three out of the nine sources supports this claim and the evidence that backs it up is misleading, confusing and from unreliable origins. There is far more evidence in the sources that Goebbels organised 'Kristallnacht' with the SS and the SA in order to impress Hitler who he was out of favour with. However, Source A, Source G and Source I clearly show that Hitler did not approve of it "he agreed that such events must not be allowed to take place". I have also learnt that Hitler didn't discourage Kristallnacht once it had taken place "Hitler squealed with delight and slapped his leg with enthusiasm", and in Source B "such demonstrations were not to be organised by the party, but neither were they discouraged". Therefore, I think that the statement 'Kristallnacht was a spontaneous event by the German people' is untrue and the vast majority of the sources do not support this claim. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Germany 1918-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Germany 1918-1939 essays

  1. Why Did Kristallnacht Take Place? (a) A ...

    This seems reliable, as it is true that in 1934 the Nuremberg Laws made life for Jews very bad, for reasons such as propaganda and the anti- Semitic education. This meant that attacks on Jews were more common at this time, so not supporting Source C in saying that Kristallnacht was spontaneous.

  2. Source Investigation: Why did Kristallnacht take place?

    Source E uses the same style of language as in Source C, when describing the destruction of Kristallnacht. Contrasted to Source D, it suggests that the Nazi party was behind Kristallnacht, and that 'most German people had nothing to do with these riots and burnings'.

  1. GCSE History Coursework: Reichstag Fire 1) ...

    a way to use the emergency powers as suggested in ii), but it does not prove anything, and it does not say anything about whether Van der Lubbe acted alone or not. Source D suggests that Van der Lubbe set fire to the Reichstag, as it has a picture of

  2. Nazi Germany - Why did Kristallnacht take place? Source based work.

    Sources E does support what is said in Source C but Source D does not support what is said in Source C and gives the view that the Germans people were involved in the persecution of Jews. Source C gives the official view of the Nazi party which was that

  1. History Sourcework - Do Sources D and E make it more or less likely, ...

    However the anti-semantic policies being introduced via the Nuremberg laws are mentioned as well as the 'Jews not wanted' signs which were starting to become commonplace. The author may have wanted to exaggerate these claims if the description was written after kristallnact to gain sympathy abroad, terms such as 'acts of terror' are used to imply this.

  2. What was the main cause of Kristallnacht?

    It could have been the government because notices "reading 'Jews not wanted' appeared in various shops and cinemas." They were probably put there by the government because the shops were various and unrelated. This source is unreliable because it was written before the event happened so it can't say who

  1. Nazi Germany: Why did Kristallnacht take place

    Denial of rights for Jews between 1933-1938 were numerous acts by the Nazis against the Jews. There were no events where the public had acted against the Jews in an anti-Semitic way. Therefore it is more likely that the Nazis did commit these events and it is highly possible, in

  2. How reliable is source E to a historian writing about the events on Kristallnacht, ...

    From my knowledge I know that the riots were started because a Nazi official was shot dead by a Jewish refugee. This made Hitler furious so he ordered Himmler to start a week of destruction against the Jews. Source E also doesn't include true facts such as that 1000's of Jews were killed and 1000's arrested.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work