• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What role did Martin Luther Kings play in the Montgomery bus boycott?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

What role did Martin Luther Kings play in the Montgomery bus boycott? In December Of 1955, a boycott of the bus system in Montgomery, Alabama took place which was to shape the future for black civil rights. As head of the MIA, an organisation formed to lead the Montgomery bus boycott, Martin Luther King played a vital role in this seminal event. But was he a leader or was he lead? Before the protest, king was an unrecognised face in Montgomery and on moving to the town, he had no plans to become involved in the civil rights movement. As a Boy, Martin Luther King Jr, grew up and attended a segregated school in Atlanta, Georgia. This segregated up bringing provided King with a strong driving force for the fight for black rights. He recalled his white friend's father demanding that he would no longer play with him. 'For the first time, I was made aware of the existence of a race problem.' ...read more.

Middle

King's faith also made him an obvious choice. As a young and popular minister, who felt 'called by God to serve humanity, his links with the church would provide local support and much needed funding. The help of the church would also attract the right kind of interest and its supporters would be keen to follow King's wishes for a peaceful protest. King lead a non-violent protest in the Montgomery bus boycott which I feel was his most important role in the event. The most major act of terrorism on the black protesters was the bombing of King's home on January the 30th 1956. His wife and their baby daughter escaped without injury. However King refused to let anger swallow him and he told and angry crowed of blacks waiting at his home that "We must learn to meet hate with love" This non-violent approach encouraged a peaceful protest which is undoubtedly one the keys to its success. King also encouraged unity and co-operation between the blacks. ...read more.

Conclusion

One oocal activist agreed: it was 'a protest of the people.....not a one man show... the leaders couldn't stop it if they wanted to.' Throughout the boycott, King made a number of inspirational speeches, undoubtedly his true talent. King's speeches 'mesmerised' his audiences sparked great admiration and publicity. When first elected as president of the MIA, King had just a few hours to prepare a speech for the mass meeting that was to be held on the evening of December 5th at the Holt street Baptist church. Considering the quality and feeling behind his speeches, I think that Martin Luther King was a strong leader in the Montgomery bus boycott. However, due to h8is slight reluctance to enter the role of president of the MIA and the way he was told what to do (preparing the speech etc), I feel that in some ways he was lead. Despite his criticisms, however, I feel it was vital for the protest to have some form of leader, and as King had the great ability to mesmerise his audiences, along with his connections with the church, he was the obvious choice. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE USA 1941-80 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE USA 1941-80 essays

  1. "The movement made Martin rather than Martin making the movement." How far was King's ...

    This progress in the light of the fact that "Initially, King had nothing to do with it"1, illustrates that success seemed more a function of King's absence than his leadership; though Sanders also claims: "King's talk of non-violent protest might have been inspirational."1 Overall the sit-ins demonstrated King's initial lack

  2. Why was Martin Luther King both so bitterly criticised, and so deeply mourned by ...

    Beneficiaries of institutional racism, they despised King as a hypocrite who spoke about peace and non-violence but created strife and disorder. King's insistence on non-violence was not an easy message to put over- the recent historiography of the importance of armed self-defence in the black community and the extent of

  1. Martin Luther King Jr.

    King involved, controlled and directed others around him to achieve goals. King had comprehensive awareness, like King any good entrepreneur has a comprehensive awareness of a total situation and he or she is aware of all the ramifications involved in a decision, King's decisions plated a major role in his success.

  2. How significant was Martin Luther King Jnr to the success of the Montgomery Bus ...

    This was ironic because the excuse that most white bureaucrats, used against blacks was that they were ignorant, foul-mouthed, ruffians and vagabonds, who were aggressive and brutal. King took the main wrath of white opposition, as he was at the forefront of the campaign, making him an obvious target that would get white racist groups lots of press publicity.

  1. From a father to a daughter.

    I have heard that even Ceylon is trying to fight for freedom. This could be the correct time to take action because along with Ceylon's efforts we might see that path to success. The great king Ashoka of India, who was the bravest and intelligent warrior king in India, made the biggest change in his life.

  2. Red Record

    It is not clear to me who the author of this message is; nevertheless, what is clear is that there were some major hostilities between the Sioux Indians and the white settlers of this era.

  1. How far did the role and status of women change 1914 and 1928

    was written a year after the event took place, it could have been possible that things may have changed politically or socially in that time space. And they could have changed their views on what happened. Another disadvantage of this source is that it may not be reliable because it was written by the blacks and so it maybe bias.

  2. The scope of this investigation is to discover the Rastafari movement mainly by considering ...

    Conflicts between nations will continue to arise. The real issue is whether they are to be resolved by force, or by resort to peaceful methods and procedures, administered by impartial institutions. This very Organization itself is the greatest such institution, and it is in a more powerful United Nations that we seek, and it is here that we shall find, the assurance of a peaceful future.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work