• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why did international peace collapse in 1939?

Extracts from this document...


Tuesday, March 13th, 2012 Ricardo Roche History Y-10 Why did war break out in Europe in 1939? When Hitler came to power in in Germany in 1933 he had already planned out what he wanted Germany to accomplish. Hitler had written a book called Mein Kampf, in 1924 that stated his goals. His first goal was to abolish the Treaty of Versailles, he fought in World War I and felt that German politicians had ?stabbed Germany in the back?, as far as he was concerned, the German Army did not lose that war. Another reason he wanted to abolish the Treaty of Versailles was because it greatly restricted the German Armed Forces and they were forced to demilitarise the Rhineland. His second goal was to expand German territory since it had been deeply limited after World War I and believed that the German people needed Lebensraum, or living space, and Anschluss, or unity, with Austria. There were Germans living in Czechoslovakia, mostly the Sudetenland, and Poland, including Danzig, and he was determined to unite them under one Reich. His third goal was to stop communism, since he had a fascist government, which was the opposite of Russian communism, or Bolshevism. Hitler believed that Bolsheviks had helped defeat Germany in World War I and they still planned on taking over Germany. ...read more.


?If the French had taken any action we would have been easily defeated? (Hitler speaking of the German march into the Rhineland) Hitler had no intention on fighting French troops in the Rhineland, as shown in the source, which is why he sent his army with the instruction of retreating if faced with any opposition. If the French had opposed to Germany, Hitler would have been greatly humiliated in Germany and abroad since may German generals were still uncertain about him. This factor could be the most important one to cause World War II since the military intervention from Britain and France would have stopped Germany early on instead of declaring war once they were already more powerful. ?They could have suppressed us but they let us through the danger zone. (?) They left us alone and let us slip through the danger zone. And when we were done, and well armed, better than they, then they started the war!? (Goebbels, a member of Hitler?s government, speaking to German journalists, April 1940) This source is evidence to the fact that Britain and France could have prevented the war if they had just reacted to the German threat, coming from an important member of Hitler?s government. ...read more.


Hitler had taken his gamble on step too far by invading Poland instead of just keeping what he already had. ?By surrendering to force, Chamberlain has encouraged aggression? our central contention, therefore, is that Mr Chamberlain?s policy [of appeasement] has throughout been based on a fatal misunderstanding od the psychology of a dictatorship.? (The Yorkshire Post, December 1938) This source can be interpreted as true in the sense that the policy of appeasement was making Hitler take larger gambles every time and that Chamberlain had misjudged Hitler?s character. However, the source could be interpreted as incorrect since appeasement was justified at the time, and it was based on Britain and France?s desire to ensure peace and avoid war, and not Chamberlain?s misjudgement of Hitler as stated in the source. In the end, if Britain and France had never adopted the policy of appeasement, the war was likely to have been avoided and international peace would have been ensured. And if Britain and France had not ended appeasement that way that they did, war would have also been evitable. Appeasement made Hitler go too far and would make him think no one dared stop him, which encouraged him to go further every time until his gamble went too far and appeasement ended, war was declared, and international peace collapsed in 1939. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. "Was the treaty of Versailles fair?"

    This essay will show that Germany acted angrily to the Treaty and why they acted in such a way. This section will look at the details of the armistice. Whilst the Kaiser was in power he fed the German population a great deal of propaganda.

  2. Notes on International Relations 1919-1939

    President of the Weimar Republic Von Hindenburg * Two years (1931) later the award went to the Bremen sister ship Europa. * The gigantic new bridge at Cologne - M�lheim was the largest suspension bridge in Europe and the 32nd bridge built over the river Rhine.

  1. Was Hitler the cause of WW2? A.J.P Taylor wrote the controversial The origins ...

    League or no League, a country which is determined to have a war can always have it. The failure of the League of Nations is connected to the American policy of isolationism because Woodrow Wilson thought of the idea of having meetings with all the nations which was called the

  2. Why was the Abyssinian crisis a death blow to the league when the Manchurian ...

    left in the league were seen to have secret meetings with Italy. This greatly undermined the belief in the league. Also, people in Europe thought that Japan was so far away from them that they didn't need to worry too much about what occurred somewhere on the other side of the world.

  1. Why did war break out in Europe in 1939

    and were told to create chaos, Hitler could then bring in his army saying that he was just trying to keep peace, this way he would not appear to be an aggressor. The Homeland Party leader demanded for the Sudetenland to join Germany, and gave the reason that the Germans

  2. Questions on World War One.

    mainland (a conflict here with the principle of nationality); Arab lands were transferred from Turkey to Britain and France; Italy was given islands in the Aegean. 6. the General principles advanced at the time of the peace treaties were very considerably modified by power-political and other practical considerations (such as in the refusal to allow Austria to unite with Germany).

  1. Was the Policy of Appeasement correct?

    if Hitler invaded Poland, then 'Britain would go to war with Germany'. After all of Hitler's action creating 'Gro�deutschalnd', it is clear that he is prepared for a war with France and England so he is obviously going to invade Poland getting more land and resources.

  2. History Revision notes - International Relations: Why did WW2 break out? 1929-1939

    To please Hitler, Schuschnigg appointed Seyss-Inquart, a leading Nazi, to become minister of interior. However, Schuschnigg held a plebiscite asking the Austrian public if they wished to join with Germany. Hitler was worried whether the votes would go against Germany joining Austria, therefore he demanded Schuschnigg to resign and instead

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work