• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why did stalemate develop on the western front?

Extracts from this document...


Question 8 Why did stalemate develop on the western front? Stalemate; A deadlock in battle situation where neither side makes any progress. Stalemate occurred in the western front, during 1914-16 because of the threat of the Germans losing some land caught from the French, which the French regained after a counter-attack. Both countries decided to defend so therefore dug trenches from the Swiss mountains all the way to the sea. They did this because of the both the Generals had no back plan and couldn't think of another plan. A further significance is that both armies were closely matched in strength and ammunition, even without same sized armies. During the 1914's trench warfare had developed, instead of what happened in the Battle of the Somme, Generals make precautions to protect their armies. ...read more.


It was so thick that daylight could barley be seen through it'. This showed that the Germans had been thinking defensively as well has attackingly. Another defensive based weapon is the machine gun, the British and the French underestimated it, but the Germans used it more to a greater affect against their Allies. After the attacks, which caused heavy casualties both forces made sure, they had an endless supply of machine guns and ammunition. The trenches were also a strong defence as they sheltered troops and kept their territory behind them. During the battle of the Somme the Germans trenches were re-enforced inside with concrete showing that trenches were thought of a defence mechanism. ...read more.


The French and British Armies combined was a big force but so was the German's and Austria-Hungary's. Both Armies had adopted the same method of fighting making it even more of a closer combat. My conclusion is that stalemate occurred because, not one, but many reasons such as the incompetence of the Generals who didn't have a back up plan so had to make do with trenches, also the way the weapons and way of fighting have changed from all out attack to a defensive encounter, which the generals couldn't figure out. The most apparent reason I find is the how trench warfare had developed and the race to the sea, which showed that neither country didn't, was to lose any more territory. Word Count: 619 Signed: Vishnu Sreedharan Great Marlow School 52435 Modern World History 1937 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. why did a stalemate devlop on the western front?

    this was a key battle as whoever got control of the ports would have an upper hand receiving re-enforcements and equipment. The Germans they could not get through enemy lines but if they managed to get control of the ports they would not be surrounded by Britain and France and would be in a Better position to attack.

  2. Describe the conditions that soldiers experienced on the Western Front in the years 1915-1917.

    The gas attacks that were used before the soldiers went over the top made it hard for them to cross No Man's Land. Sometimes the winds changed direction and so instead of the gas going towards the enemy it came back to their own trenches causing them to cough, blister, become blind and even kill them.

  1. Why Did A Stalemate Develop On The Western Front?

    But this brought time for the British and French Army to mobilise. The Battle of Mons The British Expeditionary Force deployed in the fields of Belgium, led by Sir John French. The BEF moved into position in front of Mons creating a line along the Mons-Cond´┐Ż Canal, they were just to the left of the French fifth Army.

  2. The Battle of Verdun.

    Source H says that the German strategy of attrition was an error of judgement, which they failed to see that French willpower and duress would win them through no matter what the Germans threw at them. Source H was produced in 1969 by a French Historian and seeing how it

  1. cause of the stalemate

    Russia was the lest efficient system, it size combined with the lack of railroads size (this was the reason Germany thought it would take 6 weeks for Russia for get to Germany).

  2. Was there much change in the fighting methods employed by the British Army on ...

    the ground often occurred due to the shells forcing themselves into the ground due to the force of impact, which meant that an uneven landscape was produced. Therefore tanks couldn't be used, and a serious obstacle was created for soldiers to cross.

  1. The Western Front

    with a strong US force, and although the Germans initially gained ground they were eventually halted and turned back. The Allied counterattack, beginning 18 July, is sometimes referred to as the Third Battle of the Marne and it forced the Germans back to a line running from Reims to Soissons.

  2. Field Marshall Haig: 'The Butcher of the Somme'?

    Which one of these do you trust more? Unfortunately, the purpose for which Haig wrote source B is not completely evident, however it is likely to be a diary excerpt, due to the fact that it contains short, rushed sentences. This would result in the source to be reasonably reliable, as Haig wouldn't feel the need to lie

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work