• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why did the Gallipoli campaign of 1915 fail?

Extracts from this document...


Why did the Gallipoli campaign of 1915 fail? The Gallipoli campaign of 1915 initially appeared to be an extremely attractive scheme. Due to the current stalemate on the Western Front, there was fast becoming a need for an alternate strategy to break the immovable deadlock. As Turkey was an ally of Germany, an easy victory against them would knock them out of the war, damage German morale and safeguard the Suez Canal from attack. Other nations (Greece and Romania etc) who were considering joining the war would also be influenced to join on the side of the allies and a Turkish defeat would open up trade routes through the Dardanelles. Although the campaign failed, Lord Birdwood seemed to see successes from it. In Khaki and Gown, he wrote: "even though we failed, we had destroyed the flower of the Turkish army and prepared the way for Allenby's glorious victory." He adds: "The campaign had far reaching effects in strengthening and emphasizing the essential unity and homogenesis of the British Commonwealth," which show how the campaign wasn't a complete failure and that it was a stepping stone to future victory. ...read more.


In the summer, it would be hot and ground conditions would be sometimes impossible which would lead to slow attacks and the inability to gain control of vital landmarks in time. Further to the lack of planning, there were no maps available to the troops and no proper briefing for them. If they had been told where exactly they were going and what to do in certain situations then perhaps there could have been a victory. Adding to this point, the allies did not know what weapons or how many troops the Turks had and this led to a stereotypical view of the Turks as them being bad fighters and an easy victory would ensue. These would prove to be important factors in the downfall of the scheme. There are also many short term reasons to why the campaign failed. Firstly, there were missed opportunities such as on March 18th when the original campaign to take the Turkish troops by surprise failed and then the Turkish had time to defend the area in preparation for another attack. If only De Roebeck had pressed on, instead of stopping and turning back then there could have possibly been a different outcome. ...read more.


The lack of fit, able officers caused unsuitable generals such as Stopford to be appointed, who made rash decisions. The outcome of the campaign sometimes depended on these judgments and the campaign may have been successful if generals such as Byng and Rawlinson were sacrificed from the Western Front and employed in the Gallipoli campaign. Even basic resources were missing such as water. This had a knock-on effect in that soldiers were drinking infected water which led to disease and death. This caused many troops to be lost from battle and therefore an easier victory for the Turkish troops. If the officers such as De Roebeck had been briefed properly and earlier then they could have pressed on to a foreseeable easy victory, which is even highlighted by German commander Liman Von Sanders who said:" Had it been effected with resolution and energy, it would probably have effected very far-reaching results." (Khaki and Gown (1941)) Overall, I feel that it was a good idea to pursue the Gallipoli campaign but due to long and short term factors such as inexperienced generals, the lack of supplies and poor preparation it failed. Although it was not a complete failure, it was good ideas which lead to future victory and was always remarkably close to success. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. The aim of the Gallipoli campaign and why it failed?

    By the end of the day, having suffered horrific losses, the Anzacs had established a small beachhead, clinging to cliffs that were to remain unchanged as the front line for the duration of the campaign. On the night of November 1915 the Anzacs withdrew from Gallipoli, losing no men in the evacuation, but leaving behind thousands of their fallen friends.

  2. Who Was Responsible for The Tragedy at Gallipoli in 1915?

    3The navy dealt the first strike4. The Turkish forts were continually bombarded, opening a way for the minesweepers. However, the allies had not accounted for the strength of the Turkish resistance. The first Australian soldiers landed at four o'clock, on April 25th 1915. In theory, the landing should have been straightforward.

  1. Reasons the Dardanelles campaign failed to achieve its military objectives.

    down and on the 18th of march the ships ran into mines, 3 were sunk and 3 others badly damaged. This led to the campaign being put on hold for 2 months allowing to Turks to prepare for an invasion. This would make it a great deal harder to succeed.

  2. The failures of Gallipoli

    Turkish soldiers were "ordered to die" by their superiors and not to fight or retreat. An other big problem was the lack of water. There was no way to get desalinated water to the soldiers and therefore it was hard for them to drink water and therefore couldn't fight very well.

  1. Australia's role in World War II - The Gallipoli Campaign.

    The first Australian division of 12 000 troops was to be the first to infiltrate the landing on ANZAC cove, take control of the cliffs and to give cover to the 29th British division and a French division that was to land further south at Cape Helles and Kum Kale.

  2. Describe the conditions that soldiers experienced on the Western Front in the years 1915-1917.

    The lice's sucked on their blood. There were also rats, which were attracted by left over food. Flies were also attracted to the trenches by the horses manure. All of these carried diseases. Many soldiers caught diseases. Soldiers scratched lice bites with their dirty fingers. Ulcers and boils became common due to this.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work