• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why did the League of Nation failed?

Extracts from this document...


Why did the League of Nation failed? The League has been described as 'a fragile life raft on the stormy seas of the 1930s'. This quotation has a lot of meaning concerning with the League of Nation; life raft which means to save people lives (preventing war) but when 'fragile' is added it shows that it can be easily rip apart. '...the stormy seas of the 1930s' indicates the aggression and tension in Europe which could explode anytime into another war. The raft of the League sank into 'the stormy sea of the 1930s' trying to save Europe, the fragile life raft helped some people but could not stand the unyielding storm of the 1930s. Why did it 'sink': The hopes and dreams of the League of Nation were quite realistic, although they simply rushed into them too fast. First of all, they tried to maintain the Treaty of Versailles. This frustrated Germany from the start , because they felt as though their honor was robbed from them. ...read more.


Yet, each had a weakness that proved to be it's fatal flaw. The treaty of Locarno was quite important in the fact that it showed th League of Nations dreams to somewhat realistic. Although they had problems, for one moment in time, there was peace between worst of rivals. This shows that even though the League, to many, failed, it accomplished to demonstrate the kind of peace they were aiming for, even if it was only for a split second. The economy collapse and the following of the Wall Street crash hit the League very hard. Each countries factories were damaged because of this, all fighting to make enough money to survive. This also had an effect on international relations. Overseas trade was no longer possible, because each country needed what they had for themselves. Also, the duties were very high because of the crash. In 1931, President Hoover, of the US, proposed one-year payments for each country. In June of the next year, representatives met because they were unhappy wit this proposition. ...read more.


The reason that the League did not work on the crisis sooner was because they were too busy creating beautiful sanctions and analyzing the situation to its fullest. If they simply would have acted quicker and maybe listen to Japan's reasons for attack, then their resignation could have prevented and Manchuria would not have had to kept 'hostage' for so long. Perhaps after learning from their slow actions in the Japanese crisis, the League would have acted quicker in the Italian invasion of Abyssinia. This time, they did investigate the situation quicker, but still did not take military action, because they knew it would start war. Instead, the League thought it would be best to negotiate, but again they were wrong. Mussolini did not agree with their ideas and pulled out of the Nation. The two main reasons that the League did not take military action was because they thought it might cause a war. Instead, they tried to negotiate, but both cases, lost a member. This was not necessarily a bad choice on the League's behave, but they simply had a closed mind and did not believe to attack Italy or Japan, mostly out of the fear of war and defeat. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. Explain why the League of Nations failed to deal successfully with the Japanese invasion ...

    Secondly, the League improved working conditions in many countries. Successfully banning poisonous white lead from paint and limiting the hours that small children had to work. Many families in many countries would be thankful to this as many babies were poisoned by the white lead and died. People would also be angry as families relied on the money that their children made working to keep them survive.

  2. "Was the treaty of Versailles fair?"

    Firstly this essay will look at one of the peoples� view. This was the 'stab in the back theory�. The German people thought that there nation had been ' stabbed in the back�. If this expression is normally used when something is killed.

  1. The Rise of Nation States in Europe

    It violated the agreement in the Congress of Vienna and broke the Concert of Europe (the Congress System). * In the incident of Belgium, the powers had different stand. Afterwards, the powers divided in to 2 rival camps: * Austria and Russia--- Conservative (suppressed revolutions and maintained the monarchial system).

  2. Why was the Abyssinian crisis a death blow to the league when the Manchurian ...

    There was no question of who was going to win. One of the main reasons for this was that the league was at least seen to do the right thing in the Manchurian crisis as they condemned Japan for invading and although they didn't do anything about it they did, in the end, came to the right decision.

  1. Why the League of Nations Failed?

    The covenant was a set of 26 articles or laws that all members agreed to follow. These encouraged countries to co-operate in trade and in improving the social conditions. They also encouraged nations to disarm. Nevertheless Article 10 said that all members of the league would act together to ensure

  2. Why did the League of Nations fail to keep peace in the 1930's?

    This was to dismay of the French. Britain did not consult its allies not the League about this decision, however Britain wasn't actually breaking the Treaty of Versailles. It seems that each country was looking after its own and ignoring the league.


    A fair conclusion at this point would be that the Athens treatment of her allies has reached a new level or inequality, going against the league's original intentions. But it could be equally suggested that Athens had methods of gaining total power over the allies that were under her control.

  2. Trench life.

    carrying, repair or digging parties, or sent under cover of dark to put out or repair barbed wire defenses.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work