• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why do sources A to F differ in their attitudes to the evacuation of children?

Extracts from this document...


Question 2 a: Why do sources A to F differ in their attitudes to the evacuation of children? Explain your answer using the sourses and knowledge from your studies. In considering why the sources A to F differ in their attitudes to evacuation of children, it is necessary to examine the origin of the sources and the situation that faced the country in 1939/40. The evacuation of Britain's cities at the start of World War Two was the biggest and most concentrated mass movement of people in Britain's history. In the first four days of September 1939, nearly 3,000,000 people were transported from towns and cities in danger from enemy bombers to places of safety in the countryside in operation "Pied Piper." Most were schoolchildren, who had been labelled like pieces of luggage, separated from their parents and accompanied instead by a small army of guardians - 100,000 teachers. By any measure it was an astonishing event, a logistical nightmare of co-ordination and control beginning with the terse order to 'Evacuate forthwith,' issued at 11.07am on Thursday, 31 August 1939. ...read more.


In the first place, the estimates of casualties were grossly over-exaggerated and the subsequent Government propaganda caused near panic rather than controlled movement. In addition, the man in charge of evacuation, Sir John Anderson, was a cold, inhuman character with little understanding of the emotional upheaval that might be created by evacuation More critical sources such as the 1987 film by John Borman "Hope and Glory" and recent evacuee memoirs such as those on the BBC history website paint a very different picture from sources B and D. They describe a typically British wartime shambles. Hundreds of children arrived in the wrong area with insufficient rations and, more worryingly, there were not enough homes in which to put them. Twelve months earlier, the Government had surveyed available housing, but what they had not taken into account was the extent to which middle-class and well-to-do families would be making their own private arrangements. Consequently, those households who had previously offered to take in evacuees were now full. Keeping control of the whole thing became a joyless task. ...read more.


Mass observation according to Mr Stonier quoted in a George Orwell (1947) Tribune article "Would have elephant ears, a loping walk and a permanent sore eye from looking through key holes." This can account for the hostility which some conservative views had about mass observation. The statements in an interview in May 1940 are directly opposite to the government propaganda at the time with the fathers reply to questions suggesting that he had little faith in the government's policy of evacuation. "I'm not letting him go. They can't be looked after where they are sending them." The clear differences in source E and D show the concern with which many ordinary parents viewed operation pied piper. In conclusion the range of sources used reflects the intentions of the authors. Sources A and D reflect the government view. Sources B and C give a more personal interpretation of historical events. The Bristol evacuee memories and the film "Hope and Glory" giving a raw view of historical reality and standing apart from all the other sources is the seemingly modern interview with a parent which is the closest to a modern "2003" way of examining the situation. 971 words. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. Jarrow: questions 3, 4 and 5 (sources)

    British shipyard industry" which meant that a lot of shipyard was shut down in Jarrow which caused a lot of unemployment. One of the shipyards that was affected is "palmers" which employed 10,000 men and 19,000 people depended on the shipyard workers.

  2. Why do sources A to F differ in their attitudes to the evacuation of ...

    The interviewer might have wanted a negative opinion for a reason of their own. For example, they might already have negative views of evacuation. Also, we cannot tell the particular point of the war the teacher was describing. It is possible that by the time of the second evacuation, the

  1. World War Two Evacuation Sources Questions

    This questions the reliability of both sources heavily, it seems more likely that the picture was posed rather than the writing being inaccurate.

  2. Haig in sources

    2. The absence of the general." If Field Marshal Haig never visited the front how did he know if there was any? This was because his Generals were bringing back information which was not true and they just told him the information they thought he wanted to know, because they were scared of him.

  1. You have been commissioned to undertake research into attitudes toward the Good Friday Agreement ...

    So although more people want to voice their opinion, their opinion seems to be that the agreement has not worked. (Table 1 and 2) In order to examine the extent to which religion plays a role in the voting behaviour we can use cross tabulation with the question on religious denomination and how they voted.

  2. womens crsk history

    vote after a long time of campaigning, but only after World War One. Studying Source E, I can see a photograph of the Epsom Derby Race in 1913. I can see that Emily Davison is on the floor and so are the King's horse, Anmer, and a jockey.

  1. Free essay

    why do sources A to F differ in their attitudes to the evacuation of ...

    This time period of no bombing on Britain is called the Phoney War. As with all photos, this source only shows one moment in time in one particular place. The photo could have been staged and then used as propaganda to show parents that evacuation was enjoyable and the best thing for their children.

  2. Why do sources A-F differ in their attitudes to the evacuation of children

    She wrote about her experiences as a child when she was an adult, which gives her view of evacuation from sources A and B. This extract illustrates some of the preconceptions and stereotypical views of evacuees that some of the foster parents had.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work