• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why were there different reactions in the US

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Why were there different reactions in the US Towards the conflict? During the 1960's, there were many changes in views on the Vietnam War. The reason why there were different reactions was because there were major turning points in the war then, which affected whether there was any morality in fighting. The opinions changed from pro-war to ant-war, which for example led to things such as peace talks as a result of atrocities and war crimes committed which were revealed to the public. However, at the beginning of the war pretty much most of America were pro-war (they supported it). They supported it because they were mainly influenced by the media, who made communism out to be the 'ultimate evil' and that it was set to take over the world-the Domino Theory. Propaganda heavily influenced the lives of the Americans e.g. anybody who was even suspected to sympathise with a communist party could instantly loose their job. ...read more.

Middle

Even though the Tet Offensive came as a large comeback from the VC (with more than 500 Americans dead or wounded within the first 3 weeks of Tet), it was still seen as an American victory. This is because 47% of people killed during the Tet Offensive were VC, and only 2% were US deaths. The VC suffered at least 30,000 casualties from this and never recovered. Even though the opinion of the war was changing in America, people still supported it for patriotic reasons and because of being influenced by the media. Different views came into contact and resulted in social upheaval, and new social groups, most of the anti-war cliques were made up of the young. Groups of youths opposed the war. Groups such as college students-self explanatory, or 'hippies'; who were teenagers who had 'dropped-out' of society in protest against the war, opposed the war because they thought it was morally wrong. ...read more.

Conclusion

This justifies how the pro-war attitude of the soldiers changed to anti-war; it seemed to them the only way to 'escape the fighting'. Overall, I think that the main reasons why the reaction to the war changed over time was because of the turning points of the war: The Tet Offensive, which brought up the question if the Americans were really winning the war, or the My Lai Massacre which had been revealed over a year later showed that the US tried to cover up the atrocities that they committed. I also think it was because of the amount of troops that began to be killed towards the end of the war which contributed to a change in attitude. As morale issues began to take over soldiers, and they disobeyed orders, the reality of fighting a pointless war made sense; resulting in approx. 14,000 deaths in 1968, which caused much grief among the citizens. In conclusion, views on the war in Vietnam changed, resulting in a social change, which escalated the issue furthermore, leading to different views globally and peace talks in Paris under the pressure of the view change. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Vietnam 1954-1975 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Vietnam 1954-1975 essays

  1. Did the power of television force the US to leave Vietnam?

    It is very clear sighted and is an objective photograph as we can see that the view hasn't been selected in order to portray a certain point or focus on a certain object. It is just a photograph in general of a demonstration.

  2. American reactions to the vietnam war

    Representation 1 is almost completely unobjective, mainly due to the fact that it is propaganda, with the sole purpose to persuade the reader to disagree with the war. It also contains an emotive and dark image, of a skeleton in replacement of Uncle Sam, to ignite anger and bitterness from the reader.

  1. Why are there different views about the influence of media on the course of ...

    The public would have put the government under pressure to withdraw as to try and secure the parties future by not losing possible votes. However on the other hand this source could be biased as it was said by Vietnam veteran Tom Hain.

  2. How useful are the sources A to G for explaining why there was an ...

    can rely upon this fact as meaning he would understand the complex motivations for particular events. This could, however, be his downfall - as in that time he could have developed anti-war views based on what he had seen and been reporting, that is unlikely though, given the general neutral tone of the source.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work