• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"Without the First World War, British women would not have gained the right to vote in 1918" - how far do you agree?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"Without the First World War, British women would not have gained the right to vote in 1918" - how far do you agree? Women's Suffrage in the UK The reason why most historians believe women got the vote, was because during the war effort, in which mainly the WSPU was active, women began to show that they had true integrity and demonstrated that they were conscientious, hard-working and devoted individuals who worked for the greater good of the country. The spoiled, and somewhat disfigured, view of women during the campaign for suffrage really dashed any hopes for women by reducing their appeal and candidacy for the vote. But in the war they illustrated a brighter general picture of women, and this better image diminished any previous reservations for giving women the vote. But even before this in 1912, the women were immeasurably close to the vote when the Concilliation Bill was ruined by 14 voters. This showing that women, who did get suffrage after World War I, proves the statement right by agreeing with it's assertion that women wouldn't have got the vote with World War I in 1918. Source A is an affirmation by Mrs Emmeline Pankhurst on behalf of why women should get the vote, I quote: "...that surely is a question for women", when referring to the publicity of her campaign and it's so far, dead response, from politicians. ...read more.

Middle

Of course it had other points which it tried to get across, namely one directed at the government alerting them to the actions of men and their rights and the actions of women and their consequences. It therefore agrees with the fact that without the existence of World War I, women would not have gained the vote in 1918, well, at least for over 30's and householders etc. In 1912, Lord Curzon (the then leader of the opposition and Conservative Party), stated in speech [Source C] that there were multiple issues involved with giving women the vote. It [the speech] indiscriminately generalised women who were seen to be "an effect on the government" (when referring to its current efficiency) and were seen to have "insufficient knowledge" to vote. This, as stated, was in 1912 and so was made after events such as: the first hungers strikes by prisoners, namely Marion Wallace Dunlop; the introduction of Force feeding; the failing of the campaigners impression on Asquith's vote plans; and Black Friday, where over 300 women suffragettes campaigned outside Parliament in the midst of news that the Concilliation Bill had failed. So this may have had some influence of his speech. ...read more.

Conclusion

Male employees were seen to be quite brutal in their opinions and their actions upon them - for example - women's lockers were frequently damaged and burnt, with the valuables inside. Unfortunately, in addition to low wages and male hostility, women lacked time (and often energy) because of the demands of domestic responsibilities, which still plagued women in the early 20th century. The source, IMO, doesn't seem to be anyway biased, opinionated, and to me shows a strong provenance. This is due mainly to the date stamp of the work - Rex Pope, 1991 -, which demonstrates to me that after 73 after the end of the First World War, that Rex Pope has most probably got a wide-range of facts and evaluated the different opinions and grasped a better, independent, knowledge on what happened between 1914 - 1918. There is no single purpose to the source, as it was produced in the late 20th century and so many people that would have been influential enough to read or even take action on what was wrote, may have already died. Rex Pope seems to have seized many sources at his disposal and created a sovereign view on what occurred, for purposes of people wanting to learn about the suffrage campaign and its concepts. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    ''Without the First World War British women would not have gained the right to ...

    5 star(s)

    The views of MPs may have got women the vote eventually, but if no other reasons, like their work during World War One, had existed, it is unlikely they would have got the vote in 1918. Suffragists were a major part of getting women the vote in 1918, although not as important as WW1.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    What Were the Consequences of the First World War for the British People 1914 ...

    4 star(s)

    (There were less resources because some of the people involves in labour of raw materials had died and also because they used them up or wasted them in the war and also that Britain lost her textiles markets in India and China.)

  1. Why did women fail to gain the vote between 1900-1914?

    This later would affect voting behaviour as the public lost faith and lack of support means a government cannot be in power and thus they decline. Therefore, it Is seen that actions during the First World War killed the Liberal Party.

  2. Evaluate the impact of the First World War on the social, economic and political ...

    They either had to go and look after the children or go and work in jobs, which paid a lower wage. Some people argued back when they were sacked and some women kept their professional job altogether. However, this was not a good thing for the women.

  1. Source Work- Women in World War 1

    It is a newspaper article about the 'right to serve demonstration'. This shows women weren't allowed to serve their country, but had to campaign for that too. It was only through desperation of the government that women were allowed to serve.

  2. How was British society changed 1906 - 1918

    Social and Economic Changes Factories and Towns developed where there was countryside. This change bought many problems. Conditions were terrible, Housing for workers was poor and Diseases spread easily. Working conditions in the Factories were Dangerous and Unhealthy. Eventually the Government introduced Acts to deal with these problems.

  1. Did the First World War liberate British women?

    It shows how much disadvantage working class women had to the higher-class women and men. If you were a man your name would not be changed because simply of the reason that you are a man. I would say this source is reliable because it is based on a woman

  2. Dunkirk was a triumph? How far do you agree with this statement?

    It says that there were a sizeable amount of people had died something that some of the previous sources failed to pick up on. This source paints a different picture unlike the one above, it describes a battlefield strewn with bodies and makes us think whether or not Dunkirk was a triumph.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work