• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"Without the First World War, British women would not have gained the right to vote in 1918" - how far do you agree?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"Without the First World War, British women would not have gained the right to vote in 1918" - how far do you agree? Women's Suffrage in the UK The reason why most historians believe women got the vote, was because during the war effort, in which mainly the WSPU was active, women began to show that they had true integrity and demonstrated that they were conscientious, hard-working and devoted individuals who worked for the greater good of the country. The spoiled, and somewhat disfigured, view of women during the campaign for suffrage really dashed any hopes for women by reducing their appeal and candidacy for the vote. But in the war they illustrated a brighter general picture of women, and this better image diminished any previous reservations for giving women the vote. But even before this in 1912, the women were immeasurably close to the vote when the Concilliation Bill was ruined by 14 voters. This showing that women, who did get suffrage after World War I, proves the statement right by agreeing with it's assertion that women wouldn't have got the vote with World War I in 1918. Source A is an affirmation by Mrs Emmeline Pankhurst on behalf of why women should get the vote, I quote: "...that surely is a question for women", when referring to the publicity of her campaign and it's so far, dead response, from politicians. ...read more.

Middle

Of course it had other points which it tried to get across, namely one directed at the government alerting them to the actions of men and their rights and the actions of women and their consequences. It therefore agrees with the fact that without the existence of World War I, women would not have gained the vote in 1918, well, at least for over 30's and householders etc. In 1912, Lord Curzon (the then leader of the opposition and Conservative Party), stated in speech [Source C] that there were multiple issues involved with giving women the vote. It [the speech] indiscriminately generalised women who were seen to be "an effect on the government" (when referring to its current efficiency) and were seen to have "insufficient knowledge" to vote. This, as stated, was in 1912 and so was made after events such as: the first hungers strikes by prisoners, namely Marion Wallace Dunlop; the introduction of Force feeding; the failing of the campaigners impression on Asquith's vote plans; and Black Friday, where over 300 women suffragettes campaigned outside Parliament in the midst of news that the Concilliation Bill had failed. So this may have had some influence of his speech. ...read more.

Conclusion

Male employees were seen to be quite brutal in their opinions and their actions upon them - for example - women's lockers were frequently damaged and burnt, with the valuables inside. Unfortunately, in addition to low wages and male hostility, women lacked time (and often energy) because of the demands of domestic responsibilities, which still plagued women in the early 20th century. The source, IMO, doesn't seem to be anyway biased, opinionated, and to me shows a strong provenance. This is due mainly to the date stamp of the work - Rex Pope, 1991 -, which demonstrates to me that after 73 after the end of the First World War, that Rex Pope has most probably got a wide-range of facts and evaluated the different opinions and grasped a better, independent, knowledge on what happened between 1914 - 1918. There is no single purpose to the source, as it was produced in the late 20th century and so many people that would have been influential enough to read or even take action on what was wrote, may have already died. Rex Pope seems to have seized many sources at his disposal and created a sovereign view on what occurred, for purposes of people wanting to learn about the suffrage campaign and its concepts. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    ''Without the First World War British women would not have gained the right to ...

    5 star(s)

    As the speech was given by a MP, it is useful for telling us what they thought, however the fact that it was given in 1912 means that it is several years before women actually got the vote, and opinions may have changed, possibly due to the intervening war.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    What Were the Consequences of the First World War for the British People 1914 ...

    4 star(s)

    (There were less resources because some of the people involves in labour of raw materials had died and also because they used them up or wasted them in the war and also that Britain lost her textiles markets in India and China.)

  1. Evaluate the impact of the First World War on the social, economic and political ...

    in divorce cases (1923); the civil service admitted women to the government service. They had the same right over their children as men did (1925); they are able to decide whether they want to have children or not (1930). From the beginning of the 20th Century to the 1930's, the position of women, socially, economically and politically had changed enormously.

  2. Attitudes towards women and their right to vote had changed by 1918. How important ...

    Women did not work on the front line but they were a tremendous help in the war being successful and the first women's army unit was formed in 1918, which were the Women's Army Auxiliary Corps (WAAC). There were also a Women's Hospital Corps and Women's Police Volunteers in most cities, which were formed in the autumn of 1914.

  1. Why did women fail to gain the vote between 1900-1914?

    However, although Electoral support was not great (1914 they only had 37 MPs) Labour had 550,000 members and increased their seats every year in local government elections between 1910-13. Despite this, Labour was not a huge threat to the Liberal Party and it was only after the war that they had success, and even then the conservatives overshadowed Labour.

  2. "Women over 30 gained the right to vote in 1918 mainly because of women's ...

    This is not the case as many women under 30 contributed to the war effort but were refused the right to vote. Women's role in war was a catalyst for their campaign as it gave them the chance to show responsibility and the view was now that women could be trusted with the vote.

  1. Sources A,B and C portray a particular view of the attitudes of British Soldiers ...

    Keegan is more of a modern military historian and he has the power of hindsight and may know whether Haig was a good leader. However there are other modern historians who disagree with Keegan, and believe Haig was a useless leader, such as Laffin who believed Haig "sent people to there death."

  2. 'The Passchendaele campaign was a failure.' How far do you agree with this statement?

    Of course this was to be avoided at all costs and Haig hoped that his offensive would solve that problem by, if successful, encouraging Russia to remain in the war. However as the above extract shows, the campaign did little to help the situation.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work