• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Without the work of women on the Home Front, Britain could not have won the First World War. Do you agree?

Extracts from this document...


Without the work of women on the Home Front, Britain could not have won the First World War. Do you agree? 5) I agree with the view that without the work of women on the Home Front, Britain could not have won the First World War. This is because although the men were out fighting the battles on the western front they would not have been able to fire munitions and defend themselves in those battles if the women had not been working in munitions factories. The lack of women in the factories would cause a shortage in the number of munitions our country had at our disposal then the plans for The Somme would have never been produced, as we wouldn't have 3 million shells to put into one attack. Back in England the women kept the society together by doing anything a man did before he left for the war. Sources A-E, G, H and J are about working in a munitions factory, though B, D and G are about the negative points of working in a munitions factory. Source A is a letter written by a woman in 1976 that lived through the First World War. 'We worked twelve hours a day,' If women are working in factories for twelve hours a day then we can understand that a lot of work was being accomplished in that time. ...read more.


Source E is useful is showing us that if the government were making posters and an advertising campaign to try and get women to work in the factories. It shows that it is an important issue as the government feel that they need to help persuade the minds of women as the number of women taking up the work by free will won't be enough. The poster is saying that the women are critical in the war effort. Source F is a table that shows the numbers of employed women between 1914 and 1918, in transport, manufacturing, Domestic service, as Civil Servants and teaching, all the employment numbers on Source F went up apart from the domestic services which went down. This shows that the Women took over on any job that the men had to leave behind to fight at the Western Front. Nearer the end of the war, there were fewer women in the Domestic services abandoning the 'housemaid' occupation and started filling in the spaces where the women were needed like the munitions factories, coalmines and gasworks. Source G, which is a is part of an account of a woman's experiences while working in WWI written in 1919, shows us the shocking treatment of a female working during the First World War by men. 'My drawer was nailed up by the men, and oil was poured over everything in it through a crack another night.' ...read more.


In conclusion, without the women as a whole in WW1 we wouldn't have won the war. When the women were needed, at the height of the suffragettes protest for women's rights, they stood up and did the job, even though they were still getting put down by the men thinking that they were too weak and couldn't do the work. The women during WW1 showed everyone that they could do the same job as the men. For example, during the war the women started varnishing plane wings, making shell fused and driving busses. At the end, women were working in all sorts of jobs. Many involving heavy work which people would have thought women incapable of before the War. The women learned new skills quickly and often ended up doing the work better than the men they had replaced. In 1918, the British Army broke through the Hindenburg Line and won the war. They wouldn't have been able to do this without the rifles, machine guns and artillery shells produced by the women. The women, in the end, did get the vote but only for women aged 30 and over as if they were allowed to vote, like the men, at 21, they would have outnumbered the male voters. Even if the Americans had helped us instead of the women, we still would have lost as the women that saved Britain had the will power to finish the job. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. "The Impact of World War 1 on women's role in British society was only ...

    Although they were still not treated as equals, women were given more time by men. The government had no problem with now employing women to work for them, portraying a change in attitude from before 1914 when women only usually worked in the domestic service.

  2. World war 1

    Both sources mention that the strategy used by Haig was inappropriate; the only reason he won was because he got lucky. The two sources are very similar, which shows that source F is not wrong. Sources G and H do not prove that Source F is wrong because all three

  1. Some men opposed the employment of women in WWI when their work was absolutely ...

    Another reason that was perhaps the most common reason was because men felt as though their job places were being threatened. If women could perform various tasks more efficiently than men, the owner may decide that women were better workers.

  2. How did life for a typical soldier serving in a trench on the western ...

    Parliament had more professional soldiers and more money, they paid two shillings a day to cavalry troopers, so many soldiers changed sides and left the king's army to join the Parliamentarians. In 1914 Great Britain had 80,000 trained troops ready for war.

  1. Votes for Women in Britain 1900-1918

    A similar occurrence took place a year later in the Houses of Commons in which ten women, including Pankhurst, were arrested for disturbing the peace. Though these two events did generate more media coverage than the NUWSS were currently achieving, it was not enough to be seriously changing the minds of government on the subject of votes for women.

  2. Source Work- Women in World War 1

    The pictures are not posed for, and the article supports all the ideas at the time. Therefore, this article is quite useful in showing a historian the attitudes of women towards the war effort. * * * The National Union of Women's Suffrage Society wrote sources 3 and 4, however for different reasons.

  1. Evacuation in Britain during World War II

    I think the aim of the book was to tell people that evacuation from his experience was a good thing which is the complete opposite to what source 7 told us. This source creates a huge contrast with source 7 because in source 7 evacuation is shown as a bad experience but in source 10 it is a great thing.

  2. What was life like for fighting men on the Western Front?

    As well as using the bayonets for fighting, they used it to scrape any mud off uniforms, open tins and dig communal latrines when no spades were available. Flamethrowers. Flamethrowers were invented during the war and used by the German army.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work