• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Without the work of women on the Home Front, Britain could not have won the First World War. Do you agree?

Extracts from this document...


Without the work of women on the Home Front, Britain could not have won the First World War. Do you agree? 5) I agree with the view that without the work of women on the Home Front, Britain could not have won the First World War. This is because although the men were out fighting the battles on the western front they would not have been able to fire munitions and defend themselves in those battles if the women had not been working in munitions factories. The lack of women in the factories would cause a shortage in the number of munitions our country had at our disposal then the plans for The Somme would have never been produced, as we wouldn't have 3 million shells to put into one attack. Back in England the women kept the society together by doing anything a man did before he left for the war. Sources A-E, G, H and J are about working in a munitions factory, though B, D and G are about the negative points of working in a munitions factory. Source A is a letter written by a woman in 1976 that lived through the First World War. 'We worked twelve hours a day,' If women are working in factories for twelve hours a day then we can understand that a lot of work was being accomplished in that time. ...read more.


Source E is useful is showing us that if the government were making posters and an advertising campaign to try and get women to work in the factories. It shows that it is an important issue as the government feel that they need to help persuade the minds of women as the number of women taking up the work by free will won't be enough. The poster is saying that the women are critical in the war effort. Source F is a table that shows the numbers of employed women between 1914 and 1918, in transport, manufacturing, Domestic service, as Civil Servants and teaching, all the employment numbers on Source F went up apart from the domestic services which went down. This shows that the Women took over on any job that the men had to leave behind to fight at the Western Front. Nearer the end of the war, there were fewer women in the Domestic services abandoning the 'housemaid' occupation and started filling in the spaces where the women were needed like the munitions factories, coalmines and gasworks. Source G, which is a is part of an account of a woman's experiences while working in WWI written in 1919, shows us the shocking treatment of a female working during the First World War by men. 'My drawer was nailed up by the men, and oil was poured over everything in it through a crack another night.' ...read more.


In conclusion, without the women as a whole in WW1 we wouldn't have won the war. When the women were needed, at the height of the suffragettes protest for women's rights, they stood up and did the job, even though they were still getting put down by the men thinking that they were too weak and couldn't do the work. The women during WW1 showed everyone that they could do the same job as the men. For example, during the war the women started varnishing plane wings, making shell fused and driving busses. At the end, women were working in all sorts of jobs. Many involving heavy work which people would have thought women incapable of before the War. The women learned new skills quickly and often ended up doing the work better than the men they had replaced. In 1918, the British Army broke through the Hindenburg Line and won the war. They wouldn't have been able to do this without the rifles, machine guns and artillery shells produced by the women. The women, in the end, did get the vote but only for women aged 30 and over as if they were allowed to vote, like the men, at 21, they would have outnumbered the male voters. Even if the Americans had helped us instead of the women, we still would have lost as the women that saved Britain had the will power to finish the job. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. Evacuation in Britain during World War II

    I think that is helps me understand why the 'townies' were not always liked. I don't think that much emotion is shown through this source. This source is very biased as it gives a bad example of evacuation. To be honest I don't think this source is a very reliable

  2. How important were Haig's tactics in bringing an end to WW1?

    However, Haig's tactics on the Western front used up a great deal of the German supplies, resources and especially ammunition as did the Russians on the Eastern Front by establishing the Eastern Front so early and dividing the German troops.

  1. Some men opposed the employment of women in WWI when their work was absolutely ...

    Also, to see women come in with little training battered the pride of some male workers. They had spent years training to become what they were, and they were proud of their workmanship. They felt insulted that women had managed to get the job so easily.

  2. How did life for a typical soldier serving in a trench on the western ...

    Parliament had more professional soldiers and more money, they paid two shillings a day to cavalry troopers, so many soldiers changed sides and left the king's army to join the Parliamentarians. In 1914 Great Britain had 80,000 trained troops ready for war.

  1. WW2 - Dunkirk, the Battles of Britain and the North Atlantic. The Home Front ...

    This metal would just have been dumped though, because metal was plentiful, pilots were not. On many radio broadcasts it was reported that more German planes were shot down than actually were. In some cases three or four times as many.

  2. Evacuation in Britain during the Second World War

    It shows that evacuees were happy and clean, cleaner than the stereotypical city child. Another piece of propaganda is Source H, which is an advertisement trying to get more host families in Scotland. It is persuading people that evacuees will once again benefit from evacuation, and puts moral pressure on

  1. Without the work of women on the Home Front, Britain could not have won ...

    As a photograph it is a primary source and shows more women working to make Britain's ammunition for the war. Cutting shell fuses was not the only munitions job that was absolutely vital during the war, the women had to actually fill the shells with gunpowder and assembling detonators.

  2. What was life like for fighting men on the Western Front?

    The flame thrower was basically a long tube with burning coal or sulphur in it. The soldier blew out of one side of the pipe and flame would be launched out of the other side at the enemy. The flame spreads in seconds before you knew it the enemy was burnt.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work