• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Without the work of women on the Home Front, Britain could not have won the First World War. Do you agree?

Extracts from this document...


Without the work of women on the Home Front, Britain could not have won the First World War. Do you agree? 5) I agree with the view that without the work of women on the Home Front, Britain could not have won the First World War. This is because although the men were out fighting the battles on the western front they would not have been able to fire munitions and defend themselves in those battles if the women had not been working in munitions factories. The lack of women in the factories would cause a shortage in the number of munitions our country had at our disposal then the plans for The Somme would have never been produced, as we wouldn't have 3 million shells to put into one attack. Back in England the women kept the society together by doing anything a man did before he left for the war. Sources A-E, G, H and J are about working in a munitions factory, though B, D and G are about the negative points of working in a munitions factory. Source A is a letter written by a woman in 1976 that lived through the First World War. 'We worked twelve hours a day,' If women are working in factories for twelve hours a day then we can understand that a lot of work was being accomplished in that time. ...read more.


Source E is useful is showing us that if the government were making posters and an advertising campaign to try and get women to work in the factories. It shows that it is an important issue as the government feel that they need to help persuade the minds of women as the number of women taking up the work by free will won't be enough. The poster is saying that the women are critical in the war effort. Source F is a table that shows the numbers of employed women between 1914 and 1918, in transport, manufacturing, Domestic service, as Civil Servants and teaching, all the employment numbers on Source F went up apart from the domestic services which went down. This shows that the Women took over on any job that the men had to leave behind to fight at the Western Front. Nearer the end of the war, there were fewer women in the Domestic services abandoning the 'housemaid' occupation and started filling in the spaces where the women were needed like the munitions factories, coalmines and gasworks. Source G, which is a is part of an account of a woman's experiences while working in WWI written in 1919, shows us the shocking treatment of a female working during the First World War by men. 'My drawer was nailed up by the men, and oil was poured over everything in it through a crack another night.' ...read more.


In conclusion, without the women as a whole in WW1 we wouldn't have won the war. When the women were needed, at the height of the suffragettes protest for women's rights, they stood up and did the job, even though they were still getting put down by the men thinking that they were too weak and couldn't do the work. The women during WW1 showed everyone that they could do the same job as the men. For example, during the war the women started varnishing plane wings, making shell fused and driving busses. At the end, women were working in all sorts of jobs. Many involving heavy work which people would have thought women incapable of before the War. The women learned new skills quickly and often ended up doing the work better than the men they had replaced. In 1918, the British Army broke through the Hindenburg Line and won the war. They wouldn't have been able to do this without the rifles, machine guns and artillery shells produced by the women. The women, in the end, did get the vote but only for women aged 30 and over as if they were allowed to vote, like the men, at 21, they would have outnumbered the male voters. Even if the Americans had helped us instead of the women, we still would have lost as the women that saved Britain had the will power to finish the job. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. Source Work- Women in World War 1

    If this higher female authority was established it would be harder to knocked it down again after the war like all the other jobs women had worked in had been taken away. Therefore source 3 tells us that NUWSS had a role in attempting to advance female authority and expressing

  2. "The Impact of World War 1 on women's role in British society was only ...

    Sir Nevil Macready who refused to make women a permanent feature of his force as they would "irritate" male members of the force. The First World War had some long-term effects on women's role in British society. Women now had a political influence, however limited it may have been.

  1. Evacuation in Britain during World War II

    I think that is helps me understand why the 'townies' were not always liked. I don't think that much emotion is shown through this source. This source is very biased as it gives a bad example of evacuation. To be honest I don't think this source is a very reliable

  2. How important were Haig's tactics in bringing an end to WW1?

    During the last week of August and the first three days of September, British and French forces won the Second Battle of the Somme and the Fifth Battle of Arras, and drove the Germans back to the Hindenburg line. A particularly strong German salient was then reduced by American troops (September 12-13)

  1. World war 1

    Source F also gives us another tactic used by Haig, 'if he could kill more Germans than the Germans could kill his men, then they would win the war', we know this is true because he would sent men over the top where they would be killed.

  2. Why was britain able to win the battle of britain

    They thought it would be a breeze like Poland and France. Due to Britain's organisation they were able to win. Also as Dowding had more experience that the two this played an important role, also he supported radar, and made the right choices and tactics which enable Britain to victory.

  1. WW2 - Dunkirk, the Battles of Britain and the North Atlantic. The Home Front ...

    In two weeks of air fighting, one quarter of British pilots were killed or badly injured. For 53 nights they came every night. On 7th September 1940 the Luftwaffe started bombing Cities. This was a fatal mistake. It gave the RAF time to regroup, repair airfields and train new pilots.

  2. Without the work of women on the Home Front, Britain could not have won ...

    They also had to make the explosives from TNT, this was highly dangerous work and the women in these jobs were nicknamed 'the canaries'. One of the best paid and least stressful jobs for women in the war were the Lady Welfare Supervisors, there were 1000 of these throughout Britain.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work