Without the work of women on the Home Front, Britain could not have won the First World War. Do you agree?

Authors Avatar

Without the work of women on the Home Front, Britain could not have won the First World War. Do you agree?

5) I agree with the view that without the work of women on the Home Front, Britain could not have won the First World War. This is because although the men were out fighting the battles on the western front they would not have been able to fire munitions and defend themselves in those battles if the women had not been working in munitions factories. The lack of women in the factories would cause a shortage in the number of munitions our country had at our disposal then the plans for The Somme would have never been produced, as we wouldn’t have 3 million shells to put into one attack.

Back in England the women kept the society together by doing anything a man did before he left for the war. Sources A-E, G, H and J are about working in a munitions factory, though B, D and G are about the negative points of working in a munitions factory.  

Source A is a letter written by a woman in 1976 that lived through the First World War. ‘We worked twelve hours a day,’ If women are working in factories for twelve hours a day then we can understand that a lot of work was being accomplished in that time. These 12 hours were used to make things that were needed for the war. Though unclear, we can understand something from the sexism admitted by the Liberal government at the time. The government kept up this horrific behaviour for more than 5 years before the war broke out. The fact is that the Liberal government wouldn’t start giving out rights for women all of a sudden if there wasn’t a good reason for it, and there was a good reason. They needed the extra work to be accomplished in the factories.

In 1915, before women had been drafted into the factories, there was a major shell shortage in the British army, and then they were given the working rights in an act to counter the shortage. There isn’t really any other way that the British army could get their hands on more shells. If women weren’t used then the only alternative would have been to put young boys in the factories to do the work.

Join now!

Source B shows a different side to factory working. It is an extract from a book written by Sylvia Pankhurst in 1932. She wrote that in 1916 a woman working at a London aircraft works painting aircraft wings with dope varnish approached her. Although this woman worked similar hours to the woman in source A, she earned a lot less and there were health issues. This shows there is a dark side to factory working.

Source C is from a book by an owner of a factory in Birmingham written in 1917. The factory owner writes that “typical ...

This is a preview of the whole essay