• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Is the UK copyright act of 1988 still an adequate means of protecting intellectual property from infringements such as illegal copying, plagiarism and piracy?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Is the UK copyright act of 1988 still an adequate means of protecting intellectual property from infringements such as illegal copying, plagiarism and piracy? "It is difficult for intellectual property laws to keep pace with technology. When technological advances cause ambiguity in the law, courts rely on the law's purposes to resolve that ambiguity. However, when technology gets too far ahead of the law, and it becomes difficult and awkward to apply the old principles, it is time for re-evaluation and change." (Working Group on Intellectual Property Rights (Information Infrastructure Task Force), Intellectual Property and the National Information Infrastructure (Preliminary Draft, July 1, 1994)) The copyright, Designs and Patent Act (CDPA) of 1988 was introduced to give legal protection to the creators of these works in order to prevent exploitation and to ensure their moral rights. The purpose of the CDPA was to protect the following types of work: * Literary Works * Dramatic Works * Artistic Works * Musical Works * Films * Broadcasts * Published Edition * Performers' Rights Whilst the CDPA theoretically protects certain technological plagiarism through Section 107 of the Act which states that where an individual sells, hires, exhibits, or distributes an infringing copy of ...read more.

Middle

site, thereby altering his or her perception of the material. The controversial nature and threat to copyright of this feature was seen in the Washington Post Co. v. Total News case. * Ease of Plagiarism and illegal copying Although the UK Copyright Act of 1988 protects Musical/Artistical works and the rights of performers, technology has once again outdated this feature of the act as well. The introduction of uploading software, CD copiers and file formats such as MP3 and AIV have meant that these works are no longer protected. This point was perhaps best highlighted in the recent court case between Napster.com and the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) which branded Napster a "copyright infringement machine" (3). However whilst Napster has now been shutdown, nevertheless it acted as a catalyst to many other "sharing communities" like itself such as aimster.com, imesh.com and mp3.com. Similarly this approach to illegal copying is not merely limited to music files and is extended to movies and software. This is as a result costing the entertainment industry and software companies amongst other, billions of dollars out of pocket. ...read more.

Conclusion

In contrast such a dual method will mean every country will have two sovereigns governing different areas of law. This would create vast grey areas between them that could render the proposal ineffective. Conclusion To conclude, the UK Copyright Act of 1988 was adequate at the time of design. However in the thirteen years since its design, Technology has come forward leaps and bounds. As a result this act that was initially designed mainly for the purpose of non electronic sources has now become out of date or is being largely ignored due to the growth of technology. However when incorporating any solutions to the current inadequacies, it is vital to realise that whilst the rights of copyright owners are an important component of the copyright equation, so are the rights of public for information dissemination, freedom of expression and informational privacy. As a result looking into the future, the government needs to re-evaluate the interests of all those involved and legislate towards a new more flexible copyright framework, suitable for the digital age. Similarly, due to the global nature of digital technology with no geographical boundaries, perhaps a more suitable solution would be to incorporate such a framework into a "cyberlaw". Marwan Nawaz Word Count: 2006 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Legislation & The Legal Framework section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Legislation & The Legal Framework essays

  1. Peer reviewed

    E-commerce - the legal considerations

    3 star(s)

    Sign-off and authorisation What internal sign-offs will be required? Do all pages need to be run by the internal marketing, legal or compliance departments for sign off of text or visuals? Back office infrastructure How are the orders going to be processed? Will they fit into existing off-line methods or are new processes required?

  2. 3E-The legislation that protects individuals and groups from the misuse of ICT

    kept confidential, secure from the use of others and the Act has generally been very effective for the whole of the Leyton community. The legislation protects the whole community living in or outside the Leyton area. With the act in place; the individuals living in Leyton have more secure data storage in organisations they may be registered with.

  1. The Data Protection Act 1998 - questions and answers

    If the information is encoded in some way then the individual is entitled to be given an explanation of the information. Particular rules apply where the data controller finds itself in the situation that it cannot comply with the subject access request without disclosing information relating to an individual who

  2. Privacy and Data Protection: IT Law

    an obligation on Member States to ensure that any personal information relating to EU citizens is protected by law when it is exported to countries outside Europe.61 The Directive allows the export of Data under two circumstances: either the data is contractually protected, or the jurisdiction to which it is exported provides for "adequate" protection.

  1. Data Protection Act

    unless at least one of the conditions in Schedule 2 of the Act 'the conditions for processing' is met and in case of the processing of sensitive personal data (see paragraph 1.1.2 below) at least one of the conditions in Schedule 3 of the Act' the conditions of processing sensitive data' is also met.

  2. File management and standard ways of working.

    The places you would find the copyright act are:- * Books * Web pages * Internet * Documents You should have permission to copy work that other people have done if it is a piece of work you need for a proper reason or you have the right from the person who wrote it in the first place.

  1. The Legislation That Protects Individuals and Groups using IT. Use of It by myself ...

    This affects users who do not read the whole agreement and sign up anyhow. That's why it is extremely important for Mr Ajaib to make sure he knows what he's agreeing to and be wary of what he signs up to as the Data Protection Act can't exactly help if the user agreed to his data being used.

  2. ICT LAWS

    Persona, private and confidential information about him will be safe ? It generally helps him to be careful with information that is sensitive in nature HOW THE DATA PROTECTION ACT AFFECTS ME AS A STUDENT: ? There is a chance that my personal information could be copied therefore, I must be careful how I keep them ?

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work