• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Is the UK copyright act of 1988 still an adequate means of protecting intellectual property from infringements such as illegal copying, plagiarism and piracy?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Is the UK copyright act of 1988 still an adequate means of protecting intellectual property from infringements such as illegal copying, plagiarism and piracy? "It is difficult for intellectual property laws to keep pace with technology. When technological advances cause ambiguity in the law, courts rely on the law's purposes to resolve that ambiguity. However, when technology gets too far ahead of the law, and it becomes difficult and awkward to apply the old principles, it is time for re-evaluation and change." (Working Group on Intellectual Property Rights (Information Infrastructure Task Force), Intellectual Property and the National Information Infrastructure (Preliminary Draft, July 1, 1994)) The copyright, Designs and Patent Act (CDPA) of 1988 was introduced to give legal protection to the creators of these works in order to prevent exploitation and to ensure their moral rights. The purpose of the CDPA was to protect the following types of work: * Literary Works * Dramatic Works * Artistic Works * Musical Works * Films * Broadcasts * Published Edition * Performers' Rights Whilst the CDPA theoretically protects certain technological plagiarism through Section 107 of the Act which states that where an individual sells, hires, exhibits, or distributes an infringing copy of ...read more.

Middle

site, thereby altering his or her perception of the material. The controversial nature and threat to copyright of this feature was seen in the Washington Post Co. v. Total News case. * Ease of Plagiarism and illegal copying Although the UK Copyright Act of 1988 protects Musical/Artistical works and the rights of performers, technology has once again outdated this feature of the act as well. The introduction of uploading software, CD copiers and file formats such as MP3 and AIV have meant that these works are no longer protected. This point was perhaps best highlighted in the recent court case between Napster.com and the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) which branded Napster a "copyright infringement machine" (3). However whilst Napster has now been shutdown, nevertheless it acted as a catalyst to many other "sharing communities" like itself such as aimster.com, imesh.com and mp3.com. Similarly this approach to illegal copying is not merely limited to music files and is extended to movies and software. This is as a result costing the entertainment industry and software companies amongst other, billions of dollars out of pocket. ...read more.

Conclusion

In contrast such a dual method will mean every country will have two sovereigns governing different areas of law. This would create vast grey areas between them that could render the proposal ineffective. Conclusion To conclude, the UK Copyright Act of 1988 was adequate at the time of design. However in the thirteen years since its design, Technology has come forward leaps and bounds. As a result this act that was initially designed mainly for the purpose of non electronic sources has now become out of date or is being largely ignored due to the growth of technology. However when incorporating any solutions to the current inadequacies, it is vital to realise that whilst the rights of copyright owners are an important component of the copyright equation, so are the rights of public for information dissemination, freedom of expression and informational privacy. As a result looking into the future, the government needs to re-evaluate the interests of all those involved and legislate towards a new more flexible copyright framework, suitable for the digital age. Similarly, due to the global nature of digital technology with no geographical boundaries, perhaps a more suitable solution would be to incorporate such a framework into a "cyberlaw". Marwan Nawaz Word Count: 2006 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Legislation & The Legal Framework section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Legislation & The Legal Framework essays

  1. Assets table - recording the copyright information on the logos and pictures I used.

    image because it represents the acknowledgement of fair trade and the rites of equality. Mediator 9 A young boy and his brother in Africa image s N/A Two African lads stood next to each other against a wall. I have cropped the image to miss off some web links at

  2. Discussing legislation - Data Protection act, Copyright, Computer Misuse, Health and Safety at Work ...

    the government will have to pay for them if they cant find any other Job but they want be able to say anything about there workplace is not safe enough etc.

  1. The Data Protection Act 1998 - questions and answers

    Often prospective employers would require a prospective employee to provide a copy of the prospective employee's police record as a condition of obtaining employment. Subject to some exemptions, the prospective employer can no longer force the individual to provide a copy of that record.

  2. The Legislation That Protects Individuals and Groups using IT. Use of It by myself ...

    But when hacking is then used to do something bigger, such as fraud, the punishment increased. Computer Fraud With the easy access to people's files via hacking, people could also steal data and hence, identity. With the ease to find out the information of a person's account, whether it's a

  1. 3E-The legislation that protects individuals and groups from the misuse of ICT

    The data protection law has been put over time taking in consideration both advantages and disadvantages. I believe that the data protection law has been announce because the advantages simply prevail over the disadvantages and ensure to protect Maria, myself and Mr.

  2. Data Protection Act

    The data processed if necessary for compliance with any legal obligation to which the data controller is subject. This is an order to protect the vital interests of the data subject. This introduces the requirements that as a requisite of fair and lawful processing, personal data shall not be processed

  1. Critically evaluate the extent to which it can be said that copyright law gives ...

    Although the phrase 'irrespective of artistic quality' may seem to open the floodgates in allowing protection for a lot of contemporary works, it also causes a great deal of problems. One would think that in fact anything under this category in section 4 1(a)

  2. Data Protection Act

    If the worker's eyes are damaged then they won't be working at optimum efficiency The data protection act protects my local community a lot. Shops like blockbuster have to collect large amounts of data from all their members. This means that they have to use and protect it properly.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work