• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Is the UK copyright act of 1988 still an adequate means of protecting intellectual property from infringements such as illegal copying, plagiarism and piracy?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Is the UK copyright act of 1988 still an adequate means of protecting intellectual property from infringements such as illegal copying, plagiarism and piracy? "It is difficult for intellectual property laws to keep pace with technology. When technological advances cause ambiguity in the law, courts rely on the law's purposes to resolve that ambiguity. However, when technology gets too far ahead of the law, and it becomes difficult and awkward to apply the old principles, it is time for re-evaluation and change." (Working Group on Intellectual Property Rights (Information Infrastructure Task Force), Intellectual Property and the National Information Infrastructure (Preliminary Draft, July 1, 1994)) The copyright, Designs and Patent Act (CDPA) of 1988 was introduced to give legal protection to the creators of these works in order to prevent exploitation and to ensure their moral rights. The purpose of the CDPA was to protect the following types of work: * Literary Works * Dramatic Works * Artistic Works * Musical Works * Films * Broadcasts * Published Edition * Performers' Rights Whilst the CDPA theoretically protects certain technological plagiarism through Section 107 of the Act which states that where an individual sells, hires, exhibits, or distributes an infringing copy of ...read more.

Middle

site, thereby altering his or her perception of the material. The controversial nature and threat to copyright of this feature was seen in the Washington Post Co. v. Total News case. * Ease of Plagiarism and illegal copying Although the UK Copyright Act of 1988 protects Musical/Artistical works and the rights of performers, technology has once again outdated this feature of the act as well. The introduction of uploading software, CD copiers and file formats such as MP3 and AIV have meant that these works are no longer protected. This point was perhaps best highlighted in the recent court case between Napster.com and the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) which branded Napster a "copyright infringement machine" (3). However whilst Napster has now been shutdown, nevertheless it acted as a catalyst to many other "sharing communities" like itself such as aimster.com, imesh.com and mp3.com. Similarly this approach to illegal copying is not merely limited to music files and is extended to movies and software. This is as a result costing the entertainment industry and software companies amongst other, billions of dollars out of pocket. ...read more.

Conclusion

In contrast such a dual method will mean every country will have two sovereigns governing different areas of law. This would create vast grey areas between them that could render the proposal ineffective. Conclusion To conclude, the UK Copyright Act of 1988 was adequate at the time of design. However in the thirteen years since its design, Technology has come forward leaps and bounds. As a result this act that was initially designed mainly for the purpose of non electronic sources has now become out of date or is being largely ignored due to the growth of technology. However when incorporating any solutions to the current inadequacies, it is vital to realise that whilst the rights of copyright owners are an important component of the copyright equation, so are the rights of public for information dissemination, freedom of expression and informational privacy. As a result looking into the future, the government needs to re-evaluate the interests of all those involved and legislate towards a new more flexible copyright framework, suitable for the digital age. Similarly, due to the global nature of digital technology with no geographical boundaries, perhaps a more suitable solution would be to incorporate such a framework into a "cyberlaw". Marwan Nawaz Word Count: 2006 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Legislation & The Legal Framework section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Legislation & The Legal Framework essays

  1. Assets table - recording the copyright information on the logos and pictures I used.

    image because it represents the acknowledgement of fair trade and the rites of equality. Mediator 9 A young boy and his brother in Africa image s N/A Two African lads stood next to each other against a wall. I have cropped the image to miss off some web links at

  2. The Data Protection Act 1998 - questions and answers

    Companies should note that directors and other officers of the company may have personal liability for offences under the 1998 Act. Are there any exemptions? Yes, there are a number of exemptions from various provisions of the 1998 Act .

  1. Data Protection Act

    It is important that compliance with the fair processing requirements will not of itself ensure fair processing. 1.1.3 The fair processing requirements (Schedule 1 Part II paragraph 1 to 4) Paragraph 1 Paragraph 1 provides that in deciding whether or not processing is fair, the way in which personal data are obtained will be considered.

  2. The Legislation That Protects Individuals and Groups using IT. Use of It by myself ...

    while also staying unspotted. Users would be totally unaware of anything going on. This made them extremely vulnerable. Their machines could also be hijacked and all their files could be accessed. However, nowadays it is much harder to hack a PC.

  1. 3E-The legislation that protects individuals and groups from the misuse of ICT

    the AVG licensed program and will need to know how her data is being secured. Also, Mari Korelli shall agree on the condition stated by the organisation and give her personal data. This condition is that the data will be used in accordance to the law and as an individual;

  2. The legislation that protects individuals and groups from the misuse of ICT

    case, often because of a lack of communication employees need to go on the sick for stress related illness, eye strain, back injuries and so on, this shows that there is a minority of employees that are not protected, this means that the health and safety at work act does

  1. Data Protection Act

    Ones of those is putting a screen in front of any VDU's. This is so that the workers don't damage their eye from continually looking at a screen. To check that the worker hasn't damaged their eyes they have regular eye tests.

  2. Right of privacy under Hong Kong's current laws

    Ordinance (PD(P)O). The PD(P)O protects a person's personal data9 subjected to six Data Protection Principles (DPPs)10, which state the requirements on the collection, accuracy, use, disclosure and security of personal data against interference with private, family home life and physical freedom, disclosure of embarrassing private facts like name and identity and interference or misuse of correspondence and private communications.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work