• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Automatism is generally considered to be a state in which a person has no control over his or her actions.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Laura Westwood Bratty- "Automatism means an act which is done by the muscles without any control by the mind such as a spasm, a reflex action or a convulsion; or an act done by a person who is not conscious of what he is doing such as an act done whilst suffering from concussion or sleepwalking. Evaluate the accuracy of this statement by reference to the way in which the courts have recognised the defence of automatism. Automatism is generally considered to be a state in which a person has no control over his or her actions. It can then be argued that there is a lack of actus Reus, as the act is not voluntary, or that there is a lack of mens rea because the defendant is not conscious of what he is doing. In law there is a distinction between insane and non-insane automatism, which is very different to the medical meaning of the word. The defence is not available where the defendant's mind is functioning, albeit imperfectly, in Broome v Perkins (1987), D could remember nothing about a journey, he was able to exercise some voluntary control over his movements, he had not been acting in an entirely involuntary manner. ...read more.

Middle

The external factor test was introduced in this case, involving a hypo-glycaemia diabetic who failed to eat after injecting insulin. The Judge commented, it would be "an affront to common sense to detain a diabetic when pushing a lump of sugar into his mouth would cure his problem" However, Where the cause of the behaviour is 'internal' such as a 'disease of the mind' or a disease of the body the relevant defence will be that of insanity rather than automatism such as in the case of Hennessy (1989). In this case of a hype-glycaemia diabetic it was the diabetes that caused the condition and not the insulin. As an external factor was not present this was deemed to be insane automatism. This is also the case with epilepsy, in Sullivan the defendant was held to be legally insane as it was held to be a 'disease of the mind.' The disease of the mind was given the very large scope of an impairment of "reason, memory and understanding." In light of these decisions it is surprising that in the case of T (1991), the court accepted that post traumatic stress, a disease of the mind, could satisfy automatism. However, because this condition had been caused by an outside factor, rape, the Judge allowed automatism to be put to the jury. ...read more.

Conclusion

There have been a number of criticisms to the defence of automatism, the main one being that distinguishing between internal and external causes leads to absurd and irrational distinctions - such as that drawn between Hennessy and Quick. The main reason given for the difference is that automatism caused by an internal factor, namely a disease, is more likely to recur than such a state caused by an external factor. This may be true of a comparison between an automatic state caused by a long-term mental illness, and one caused by a blow to the head, but as the cases on diabetes show, the distinction can be tenuous. The draft Criminal Code proposes maintaining the law on automatism as it stands, because the public interest is best served by the complete acquittal of anyone who acts while in a condition of non-insane automatism. This may be reasonable for the one-off offender, however, it offers no public protection against someone who is prone to recurring states of automatism through an external factor. Also the distinction between internal and external causes could be abolished. Reform of the insanity defence to bring it in line with medical descriptions would aim towards this; behaviour that was allegedly automatic but clearly did not fall within medical definitions of insanity could then be considered solely in the light of the danger of recurrence, and the element of recklessness in the behaviour of the accused. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

5 star(s)

Summary: this is a very detailed and sophisticated essay that is written at a much higher level than expected for GCSE. Many degree level students would be pleased to be able to show the understanding of the defence shown here. Rating: *****

Marked by teacher Nick Price 01/05/2013

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Law essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    "Within the present system of precedent in the English legal system, judges have very ...

    4 star(s)

    This is because precedents set by courts with a higher status in the hierarchy are binding upon those below whilst the decisions from the lower courts can only amount to persuasive authority to its superior courts. The House of Lords' decisions used to bind itself as well until July 1966

  2. Marked by a teacher

    The Police and Criminal Evidence Acts 1984-provides an effective balance between the powers of ...

    3 star(s)

    the peace is satisfied that there are reasonable grounds for believing: - that a serious arrestable offence has been committed; and - that there is material on premises specified in the application which is likely to be of substantial value to the investigation of the offence; and - that it

  1. There are four different types of law, criminal, civil, common and statuate. In this ...

    The police are the first and foremost line of defence for the general public against crime and threatening individuals. So discipline has got to be at the greatest level of all of the emergency services, else the results could be devastating.

  2. Criminal Law (Offences against the person) - revision notes

    - Co-defendants Appealed on the Maloney direction - jury not clear 2 miners aimed to stop miners going to work. Drop a concrete block onto the motorway to stop them. Hit taxi driver and kills him. Applying Maloney 1 = Yes Applying Maloney 2 = Yes, foresaw and did intend jury said.

  1. civil law, criminal law and habeas corpus

    The criminal law also details the defences that defendants may bring to lessen or negate their liability (criminal responsibility) and specifies the punishment which may be inflicted. crime, a punishable act or conduct, prohibited by the criminal law. It is important to distinguish a criminal act from an immoral one;

  2. Offences against the person act 1861; criticisms and reforms.

    the vocabulary used in 1861 has evolved to have different meanings in modern England. The wording has also lead to a gap in the law, with, in certain cases defendants getting off a crime, which in terms of common sense he is guilty of.

  1. 'What defences does the law provide for journalists facing defamation cases?'

    could not use it to defend defamatory facts made on a person. Therefore the facts the journalist is basing the comment on must be true and stated clearly. For example to say 'her behaviour was disgraceful' is defamatory, but if that comment is fair and based on the persons actions,

  2. role of media in OJ Simpson Case

    He also purchased a knife similar in size and shape to what was believed to have been the murder weapon. The prosecution claimed Simpson dropped the bloody gloves, one at the crime scene and one at his home, and that he wore shoes the same size as those that made

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work