• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Data Handling.

Extracts from this document...


Maths Coursework: Data Handling In this investigation I am comparing body mass index (BMI) against average number of hours of TV watched a week to see what correlation (if any) there is. This is because it seems relevant to BMI (since the less exercise people do the heavier they are, thus the higher BMI). The aim will be to show the correlation, if one exists, clearly and prove it, taking into account and bad results or bias in the data. To do this, I will first look at the population (1200 people). I must have at least 5% for the results to be reliable and without bias, so I will take 240 people (5%) as the sample. I will take stratified samples, and work out each person's body mass index; this is done by dividing their weight in kilograms over their height squared in metres. The groups I will be dividing them into for stratified sampling will be gender and year group, which I will then take 48 simple random samples from each group. A more detailed investigation could be done by adding other factors, such as distance from school or method or transport to school (allowing more or less time to watch TV). My hypothesis is that males will watch TV more, and the higher the years will watch more TV. ...read more.


Average deviation for Y7 Females I then made a graph to illustrate these results: Year groups are: 1=Y7, 2=Y8, 3=Y9, 4=Y10, Y=11. This graph shows that as the year groups go higher, deviation increases for males until year 11, when in drops greatly. For females, their deviation drops in the first year, then slowly increases, then drops again in the final year. This suggests as males get older, their BMI increases greatly, then hardly increases at all; for females, their BMI increases very slowly over the years, then averages out. I then made the BMI results into a bar chart and scatter graph to see if there was a pattern: As we can see, the graph appears to show no correlation. There are exceptional results, but when looked at closely there is a small positive correlation between peoples BMI and number of hours of TV watched. I next constructed a pie chart from the frequency table to see if I could extract any useful data: As we can see, there is a large amount of people in the same group of BMI (just under half). There appears to be no correlation in peoples BMI on its own (i.e. there is no correlation between year group BMI or gender BMI). From this we can tell that although there is no correlation between BMI in year groups and/or gender alone, when hours of TV watched is introduced, a correlation becomes apparent. ...read more.


The Spearman's Correlation result shows my theory was right and proved it. My hypothesis was that as there was an increase in BMI there was an increase in hours of TV watched (which there is), but it is negligible, leaving my results open to counter-arguments. Also, it is only right for the middle years (8, 9 and 10 mostly), showing as people get older their TV habits change. Overall however there is a small increase in BMI according to the more TV hours watched. Teenagers are also experiencing growth spurts during their teenage years, increasing their BMI quickly, and rounding off around 15 or 16. The sampling I took (stratified) was a good sampling, but it was only just over 5%, and more could be taken for better results and less chance of bias. Also, the topic could have been better. For example, instead of exploring hours of TV and BMI (which there is unlikely to be a link between in thousands of people), I could have investigated method of travel, distance from school, and BMI, which could have proved more conclusive. My results aren't conclusive as they do not show a correlation either way in great size, and could be left open to interpretation. There are however a large amount of results and they do show a small correlation, which is better than none at all. Ralph Weatherburn 11T ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE IQ Correlation section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE IQ Correlation essays

  1. Perform a statistical enquiry that will either prove or disapprove my hypothesis.

    X? = ?x n Where X? = mean of the values ?x = Sum of all the values n = Number of values I have decided to do the mean for the IQ and the English SAT results both. I will try to see what an average IQ is to the average SAT result.

  2. Comparison of SATs results to obtain statistical data on students.

    The modal levels for males in English in 1999 is: Mode= 5 The modal level in English in 1999 is: Mode= 5 The range of levels for females in English in 1999 is: Range= 7-3= 4 The range of levels for males in English in 1999 is: Range= 7-3= 4

  1. Guestimate - Data handling coursework

    This will be my primary data. The rest of the 18 data which we still need to collect will be from students who are also doing the experiment. From that data 6 will be males and 6 will be females.

  2. The 3 statements I am going to investigate are: -Does the gender of the ...

    I will make a standard column graph to go with it, showing the mean KS2 result. I will then analyse my findings. I will then move on to use the method of box and whisker, discovering the lower, higher and interquartile range for boys and girls of both years, when IQ and KS2 results are concerned.

  1. Mathematics Statistics Coursework

    Data Collection I have collected all my data I planned to collect from Mayfield High School students. I didn't experience any problems collecting my data as it was collected using a macro from a spreadsheet. I have included my data in a summary table as I have only included

  2. GCSE Statistics Coursework

    1 325 26 212 1 309 42 212 1 342 9 213 2 325 -26 215 4 363 -12 215 4 410 59 220 9 315 36 225 14 283 68 229 18 370 -19 230 19 323 -28 238 27 368 -17 238 27 230 -121 240 29 290

  1. My hypotheses are: -1. People's average SAT and average GCSE results will have a ...

    The correlation is smaller than both the boys and the combined boys and girls average results. Boys and girls SAT's average GCSE average SAT Rank GCSE Rank Difference Difference� 4.33 3.2 50.5 52 1.5 2.25 2.67 1.28 55 55 0 0 6.33 6.64 13.6 10 3.6 12.96 5.67 4.75 31

  2. Mayfield High school

    1 1 1 1 2 2 7 7 7 7 7 7 8 8 8 8 9 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work